HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-11-23 - AGENDA REPORTS - GVR SOLEDAD INTERSEC UPDATE (2)CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
DATE: November 23, 1999
City Manager Approval:
Item to be presented by:
SUBJECT: GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD AND SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD
INTERSECTION/INTERCHANGE - UPDATE
DEPARTMENT: Transportation & Engineering Services
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council accept the Feasibility Study Report and the City staff presentation on the
Golden Valley Road and Soledad Canyon Road intersection/interchange. Based on the
report recommendations, authorize staff to move forward with the preliminary design and
environmental assessment phase of the project, subject to evaluation of any additional at -
grade alternatives submitted prior to December 17, 1999 by the Soledad Canyon Road
Improvement Alliance. Authorize the City Manager to extend the current contract with
ASL Consulting Engineers (ASL) to move forward with the next phase of the project.
BACKGROUND
During the May 11, 1999 City Council meeting, Councilmembers approved a contract with
ASL Consulting Engineers to perform a preliminary design analysis and prepare a
Feasibility Study Report for a new intersection/interchange between the proposed Golden
Valley Road and existing Soledad Canyon Road. The results of that study were presented
to the City Council during a study session on October 5, 1999, and repeated during a
Council meeting on October 26, 1999.
Council directed City staff to meet with local developers, business owners, and residents
within the area to provide the property owners and residents another opportunity to review
the developed concept alternatives and solicit their input on specific issues raised by each
alternative design. On Monday, November 8, 1999, City staff and ASL held a second
meeting with the Soledad Canyon Road Improvement Alliance (Larry Rasmussen, Allan
Cameron, and their engineers) to discuss their proposed at -grade intersection design. Later
that evening, the City held its second public meeting inviting 700 local business owners and
residents, including representatives from Santa Clarita Business Park, Valley Business
Center, and Canyon Country Beautification Committee to address public questions and
collect comments to incorporate into the next phase of the study.
:.I W1.01N,Lvaj
GOLDEN VALLEY AND SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD
INTERSECTION/INTERCHANGE FEASIBILITY STUDY
November 23, 1999 - Page 2
The Soledad Canyon Road Improvement Alliance indicated that they have two additional
at -grade alternatives that they believe are superior to any alternative evaluated in the
Feasibility Report. City staff has agreed to evaluate their alternatives prior to initiating
the environmental process, given that the requested information is submitted by
December 17,1999.
Questions and concerns raised during the public meeting were similar to those raised
during the first public meeting held in July 1999. In addition to the right-of-way, issues
raised include the railroad and traffic safety, geology and seismic safety, and aesthetics.
Mr. Lou Cluster, representing the SCRRA/METROLINK, was present at the meeting to
answer questions regarding rail -crossing issues. Mr. Cluster indicated that the position of
the SCRRA and the PUC had not changed, and for reasons previously identified, they
would strongly oppose an at -grade crossing, whether as an interim solution or a permanent
one.
One of the reasons that the Council requested the study was to begin to understand the
impacts that would result on the adjacent properties. There are both public and private
pending projects that may be impacted by the eventual construction of any configuration
linking the two six -lane major highways. City staff cannot provide direction to area
business owners and applicants interested in developing adjacent properties until the City
has completed the geometric design of said intersection.
Based on criteria and methodology set for the study, the feasibility report recommends one
alternative as the preferred design for the proposed connection. This recommendation may
change if additional alternatives are proposed before or during the process. Further
analysis (by staff, consultants, and the City Council) during the environmental review and
preliminary design phases, along with additional public participation, will allow staff to
continually address concerns and comments raised by the public, and will aid to eventually
set the configuration and alignment of the proposed connection.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
City Council may choose to postpone or cancel further work on this issue. Postponement
will have significant impacts on the adjacent projects associated with this study. The
results of the next phase of this study will provide the City Council with adequate
background information to make further decisions regarding the alignment of the proposed
connection.
FISCAL IMPACT
GOLDEN VALLEY AND SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD
INTERSECTIONANTERCHANGE FEASIBILITY STUDY
November 23, 1999 - Page 3
The subject project is within the joint City/County Bouquet Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
(B&T) Construction Fee District under the City's jurisdiction. The City anticipates that the
County will fund this next phase of the project in the same manner as the phase that was
just completed.
ATTACHMENT
None.
KM:tw
council\gldnvlbr\update.doc
SANTA CLARITA BUSINESS PARK CO.
23120 Lyons Avenue #5436
Newhall, California 91321
661-259-5606 Fax 661-259-4065
November 22, 1999 9701.688
Mr. George Caravalho
City Manager
City of Santa Clarita
23920 Valencia Blvd.
Santa Clarita, Ca 91355
RE: Golden Valley Road — Soledad Canyon Road Intersection
Dear George,
Recently, the City commissioned a study for the intersection of Golden Valley
Road and Soledad Canyon Road. The initial conclusion of this feasibility report
is to have a grade separation (bridge) cross over both the Metrolink rail line and
Soledad Canyon Road. This conclusion is preliminary and if finally concluded
that it is the most favorable, may not be built for at least seven to twelve years
due to financial and development restraints.
I am of the opinion that regardless of the alignment or methodology of the
intersection, the City needs to act now, with an interim solution to move traffic
along the currently over congested Soledad Canyon Road and the soon to be
Golden Valley Road.
Current Situation — Critical
With Golden Valley Road under construction by January 2000, the Golden Valley
High School opening in September of 2001 and Santa Clarita Business Park fully
developed (3.5 million square feet of buildings) by 2003, traffic on Golden Valley
Road is anticipated to swell to unprecedented proportions. This traffic flow will
put stress on the feeder intersections, at Ruether Avenue, Golden Triangle Road
and Golden Oak Road, to Soledad CanyonRoad.
Mr. George Caravalho
City of Santa Clarita
November 22, 1999
Page 2
Historic B&T Districts Never Discussed A Flv Over Soledad Canyon Road
Neither the Los Angeles County Public Works nor the City of Santa Clarita had
ever designated a bridge at Golden Valley Road and Soledad Canyon Road in
either the Bouquet Canyon or the Route 126 (later renamed Eastside) B&T
District. The first formal consideration for a bridge was through the ASL
Engineering study in August 1999.
A Bridge To No Where
The ASL study was limited in determining the initial concepts for a Golden Valley
Road/Soledad Canyon Road crossing. It is assumed that this crossing would
later be tied into the Golden Valley Road Bridge crossing the Santa Clara River
and continuing into Newhall Ranch Road on the north side of the river. We
understand that currently both the Bouquet Canyon and the Eastside B&T Fee
Districts would not have enough funds to build either or both of these bridges.
The fact that Newhall Ranch Road and its surrounding area have yet to be
committed for construction, would have the Golden Valley Road/Soledad Canyon
Road Bridge becoming a `Bridge to No Where It appears practical, that when a
bridge is built across Soledad Canyon Road it should continue beyond the Santa
Clara River and concurrently be tied into a major arterial street, such as Newhall
Ranch Road. To build a bridge and create a dead end, forcing traffic one-way
would be a deterrent to good basic traffic flow and waste the City's time and
money. Both bridges should be designed and constructed together to maximize
dollars spent and provide a safe transition from one major street to another.
At -Grade Crossing
An at -grade crossing to act as an interim solution for Golden Valley Road and
Soledad Canyon Road traffic appears to be a reasonable idea. The cost of an
interim crossing would be in the neighborhood of $3 million compared to the $25-
35 million for any of the four ASL bridge concepts. The interim at -grade crossing
would solve immediate traffic concerns and the addition of a bridge at a later
date, would give the public another route to travel.
Problems An at -grade crossing has been suggested but has meet with
criticism due to 1) the close proximity of the Golden Valley Road/Golden Triangle
Road intersection to the Golden Valley Road/Soledad Canyon Road intersection
and 2) the Metrolink rail line.
Mr. George Caravalho
City of Santa Clarita
November 22, 1999
Page 3
Solutions Solutions to these issues are 1) Golden Triangle Road could
be relocated a safe distance from the rail line and Soledad Canyon Road to allow
for adequate separation between the intersections. An alternative would be a
new road crossing Golden Valley Road could be placed for through traffic to go
east or west, while Golden Triangle Road is converted into right turn only
intersection with Golden Valley Road. 2) Two issues are associated with the
train tracks, first illegal crossings when the guardrail is down and second the
comparison of accidents at an at -grade crossing compared to a barrier placed at
the end of a major street (proposed bridge). The Metrolink rail line crossing
could be designed using a raised center median device to defer any traffic from
crossing against the train signal guard. If a bridge was built with a barrier placed
at its end and a one-way turn to exit, the barrier at the end of a major street has a
tendency of creating more accidents than a controlled at -grade rail crossing.
Although it is the intention of the designers to design a system where there are
no loss of life, limb or property, statistically the at -grade crossing would have the
fewer accidents than the dead end barrier.
Conclusion
The City Council should expand Staffs authority to discuss and look into an
interim solution to the Golden Valley Road/Soledad Canyon intersection. The
temporary at -grade crossing suggested would be preferred because; 1) it would
not require any major condemnation action; 2) could be accomplished with
minimal effect on traffic (work being done at night); 3) provide the most cost
effective way to handle heavy traffic loads currently experienced and expected in
the area and 4) provides adequate time for a full study and full funding of the
permanent solution for a crossing.
If you need any additional information or facts backing up my discussions, please
call me.
Santa Clarita Business Park Co.
zv. Sv'k'
Larry Rasmussen
C. JoAnne Darcy & Councilmembers J. Klajic, L. Weste, J. Heidt & F. Ferry
SANTA CLARITA BUSINESS PARK CO.
23120 Lyons Avenue #5436
Newhall, California 91321
661-259-5606 Fax 661-259-4065
November 21, 1999
Mr. George Caravalho
City Manager
City of Santa Clarita
23920 Valencia Blvd.
Santa Clarita, Ca 91355-2196
9701.685
RE: Development Agreement between the City of Santa Clarita and Santa
Clarita Business Park Co.
It occurred to meat the November 9, 1999 Council meeting that the current City
Council maybe unaware of the exact terms and benefits applicable to the City as
a result of the Development Agreement between the City and Santa Clarita
Business Park Co. I am convinced that if the entire Council were aware of the
City's benefits derived from this Agreement, they would see the Agreement
benefited both parties, and that a win-win situation was created.
The Development Agreement required, in addition to the numerous Tentative
Tract Conditions imposed by Los Angeles County, additional requirements as
result of the negotiations between the City and SCBP. The items listed below
are the result of the final Development Agreement and list the direct obligations
of SCBP as well as the residual effects of the Agreement:
Bridge & Thoroughfare Fees For Tract 42670-02:
Bridge and Thoroughfare fees for Tract 42670-02 alone are estimated at
$4,300,000: Three additional properties added to the Business Park
under the Development Agreement would account for almost an additional
$800,000 in fees. (Cost Analysis: If SCBP were not developing the
Business Park the City would lose $5,100,000 in fees.)
2. Improve Golden Valley Road:
Three areas (Phases 1-3) of improvements including two outside of Tract
42670-02 and Golden Valley Road within Tract 42670-02 would complete
Golden Valley Road from Golden Triangle Road to Sierra Highway. SCBP
through Spirit Construction provided leadership as part of the design and
build phases of the work. At the City's direction, Phase 1 was taken away
from SCBP, leaving SCBP responsible for only Phases 2 & 3. (Cost
CAMy Documents\Scbp\Misc.\9701.685.doc.P.T.
City of Santa Clarita
Development Agreement
9701.685
November 21, 1999
Page 2
Analysis: The cost for Phase 2 is $1,799,242 [as per CFD Agreement] and
Phase 3 is $7,784,430 [as per CFD Agreement). If SCBP was not
developing the Business Park, then costs for Phase 2 & 3 would increase
as follows: Phase 2 would require the right-of-way to be acquired. Using
the same parameters the City has used to acquire right-of-way from other
Golden Valley Road landowners (square footage times a dollar amount).
The total square footage of Golden Valley Road within Tract 42670-02 is
186,437 S.F. times $3.55/S.F. _ $661,851. Phase 3 would require an
additional 825,000 cubic yards of imported dirt to fill Golden Valley Road,
south of Tract 42670-02. At an estimated $5.00/C.Y. the cost of the
import would be $4,166,250. Total benefit to City for Phase 2 & 3 =
$14,441,773)
3. Improve Golden Triangle Road:
Improve Golden Triangle Road from east of Golden Oak Road to west of
Ruether Avenue. These improvements along with the in -tract
improvements will make Golden Triangle Road a through street from
Rainbow Glen Road to a point west of Golden Oak Road. (Cost Analysis:
$1,200,000, however a portion or all of this amount may be reimbursed to
SCBP if new retail sales tax collected within Business Park are charged
before termination of Golden Triangle Road Reimbursement Agreement.
The full $1,200,000 amount is shown to reflect the cost of Golden Triangle
Road outside of Tract 42670-02, if SCBP did not develop Business Park)
4. Streetlights:
This will be the only business park in town that has streetlights on both
sides of the street. SCBP was not required to place lights within the
Business Park, but agreed to the City s request for this improvement for
the benefit of the community. (Cost Analysis: 235 streetlights @ $2,200
ea. _ $517,000)
5. Sidewalks:
Another first for a business park, sidewalks on both sides of the street.
Again SCBP was not required to place the sidewalks, but voluntarily
agreed. (Cost Analysis: 205,685 S.F. @ $2.70/S. F. _ $555,349)
C:\My Documents\Scbp\Misc.\9701.685.dOc.P.T.
City of Santa Clarita
Development Agreement
9701.685
November 21, 1999
Page 3
6. Lot 71, Tract 42670-02:
This lot will be sold to the City for the price of one dollar ($1). The lot is
located between Redview Drive and the Sports Complex and will enhance
the Complex's access and total recreational use. (Cost Analysis: Lot 71 =
87,000 S.F. @ $5.00/S.F. _ $435,000)
7. 12 -Acre Site:
The 12 -acre site located south of Tract 42670-02, with frontage on the
Golden Valley Road extension was offered to the City at a below market
rate of $7.50 per flat pad area. (Cost Analysis: 12 -Acre Parcel after
grading will yield approximately 304,920 S.F. Fair Market Value is $10.50
S.F. _ $3,201,660 minus [the 304,920 @ $7.50 (City costs) _ $2,286,900]
_ $914,760)
8. . Right -Of -Way for 12 -Acre Site:
As a result of Golden Valley Road extension, approximately 2.6 acres of
the 12 -acre site would be lost to right of way and slope easements on the
sites eastside. The fair market value of the lost property would be equal to
the price the City is purchasing the remaining portion. (Cost Analysis:
1,000 L.F. x 116 L.F. = 116,000 @ $7.50 = $870,000)
9. Fence DWP Riaht of Way:
Provide, for the public's safety, a fence within Tract 42670-02, along to the
DWP right of way adjacent to Golden Valley Road and portions along the
tract's eastern boundary. (Cost Analysis: $201,500)
10. Increase the Volume of Previously Approved Retention Basins:
As part of Tract 42670-02 grading and storm drain plans approved by L.A.
County and at the request of the City, SCBP, agreed to increase the
volume of five retention basins associated with the tract. The redesign
was to accommodate runoff generally from outside the Business Park.
The result of the redesign was a loss of saleable flat pad area from the
Business Park. (Cost Analysis: Loss of 37,348 S.F. of flat pad area @
$10.50/S.F = $392,154)
CAMy Documents\Scbp\Misc.\9701.685.doc.P.T.
City of Santa Clarita
Development Agreement
9701.685
November 21, 1999
Page 4
Santa Clarita Business Park Co. has agreed to pay the full cost for the two
traffic signals to be placed along Golden Valley Road at Redview Drive
and Golden Triangle Road. (Cost Analysis: 2 signals @ $150,000 ea. _
$300,000)
12. Trail from Soledad Canyon Road to Sports Complex:
SCBP has agreed to create a trail from the existing trail on Soledad
Canyon Road to the Sports Complex, via D.W.P. right of way, once the
City obtains the right from D.W.P. (Cost Analysis: 3,600 L.F. Pave -36, 000
S.F @ $2.00/S.F. = $72,000, Fence- 7,200 L.F. @ $12.00 L.F. = $86,000
& Landscape = $100,000. Total = $258,400)
13. Parking Lot for Sports Complex:
SCBP has agreed to grade and pave an overflow parking lot for the Sports
Complex beneath the adjacent D.W.P. lines west of the Sports Complex
on the right-of-way obtained from the D.W.P. by the City. (Cost Analysis:
$257,025)
14. Below Market Sales of Lots 1 & 2 Tract 38936 for Family & Child
Development Center:
Santa Clarita Business Park Co. will be selling the Family & Child
Development Center two lots, below market rate, for their Canyon County
facility. (Cost Analysis: 116,400 S.F. @ $11.50/S.F.[School District's
appraisal] = $1,338,600 minus [$500,000 selling price] = $838,600)
15.
Santa Clarita Business Park Co. has sold a lot to the Hart High School
District, below the market rate, for use as an education center across from
their District offices. (Cost Analysis: 49,400 S.F. @ $11.50/S.F. [School
District's appraisal] = $568,100 minus [$370,000 selling price] = $198,100)
C:\My Documents\Scbp\Misc.\9701.685.doc.P.T.
City of Santa Clarita
Development Agreement
9701.685
November 21, 1999
Page 5
16.
The "No Further Action" letter for the footprint of the Golden Valley Road
right-of-way was expedited through Santa Clarita Business Park Co.'s
effort. SCBP hired the law fine of Paul, Hastings Janofsky & Walker,
environmental attorneys, to expedite the DTSC and Porta Bella's
developer in progressing with the reclassification of the areas "Operative
Units", the field and laboratory work, and the final review of the documents
necessary in obtaining the letter. Additionally,. SCBP hired RAMCO
Environmental to make an analysis of the scope of work and time required
to provide DTSC with information leading to the "No Further Action" letter.
(Cost Analysis: PHJW = $58,520, RAMCO = $25,489, Total = $84,009)
17. Mello -Roos Financing vs General Obligation Bonds:
The use of a Mello -Roos District to pay for the infrastructure of Golden
Valley Road allowed the road to be built without the City paying for the
work through General Obligation Bonds. The first phase of the Mello -
Roos District will sell $10.3 million in bonds which would result in $8.9
million available (after payment of consultants, fees, reserve etc.) for
actual onsite construction. ,Of the $8.9 million, $7.8 million will be used on
Golden Valley Road, leaving $1.1 million for Tract 42670-02
improvements. The District will secure these funds via a lien on property
owned by SCBP, with SCBP taking the financial risks in the event of an
economic downturn.
18. Provide the City with $33 Million for Infrastructure Work:
Santa Clarita Business Park Co. has placed its entire tract as collateral for
the Mello -Roos District. In return, up to $33 million in bonds would be sold
for the infrastructure within Tract 42670-02 and Golden Valley Road.
Without Tract 42670-02 construction, the City would be without these
important additions to the eastside circulation system.
CAMy Documents\Scbp\Mist.\9701.685.doc.P.T.
City of Santa Clarita
Development Agreement
9701.685
November 21, 1999
Page 6
19. Jobs in Canyon Country:
Projections for a fully developed business park anticipate up to 14, 000
newjobs for the Canyon Country area. Local people will fill a large portion
of these jobs. As a result, commuter time and the use of natural
resources (gasoline, tires, peoples time etc.) will be greatly reduced.
20. Increase Sales Tax Revenue in Canyon Country:
As new industry opens within the business park, new sales tax revenues
will be generated for the City. In addition local sales tax revenue will
increase from the local daily purchases of the anticipated 14,000 -person
workforce created by the Business Park.
21. Increase in Property Tax in Canyon Country:
The addition of over 200 acres of industrial/commercial/retail business'
with the Business Park, with a build -out value of approximately $270
million will add to the tax base of Canyon Country.
22. Road to Golden Valley High School:
The completion of Golden Valley Road from Golden Triangle Road to
Sierra Highway will provide a two -directional road to the previously
landlocked Golden Valley High School site.
23. Golden Valley Road/High School Traffic:
With the addition of Golden Valley High School and Golden Valley Road,
the local student body (or their parents) will not have to travel cross-town
to attend other high schools. This should have a positive impact on cross-
town traffic as high school students will have a short trip to school. The
total aggregate miles saved by the proximity of the school and the number
of trips for special events and after-school activities enhances the positive
contribution Golden Valley Road makes to reduce cross-town traffic in the
City.
C:Wy Documents\ScbpWisc.\9701.685.doc.P.T.
City of Santa Clarita
Development Agreement
9701.685
November 21, 1999
Page 7
24. Reduce Traffic Across Soledad Canyon Road:
It has been shown that cross-town traffic on Soledad Canyon Road would
use Golden Valley Road to cross the valley or to access Highway 14.
25. Traffic Mitigation on Rainbow Glen Road:
Traffic congestion on Rainbow Glen Road will be reduced due to the
extension of Golden Triangle Road, Golden Valley Road and Ruether
Avenue.
26. College of the Canyons Campus:
As a result of the Golden Valley Road extension and the High School Site,
College of the Canyons is expected to open a satellite campus or the
eastside of the City, adjacent to the new High School
27. Direct and Indirect Economic Impact of Business Park:
P74
The Business Park will have the effect of attracting new workers to Santa
Clarita and employing many of the local workforces. Local retail and
restaurant business will have much more business as a result of the
Business Park.
The Business Park and its potential job and tax base will add to the assets
of eastern Santa Clarita. These additional attributes will serve to draw
closer the economic balance between the east and west sides of the
community.
29. Successful Partnership Between the Public and Private Enterprise:
The partnership formed between the City and Santa Clarita Business Park
Co. for development of the industrial park and surrounding infrastructure
that will benefit both parties is a win-win relationship.
CAMy Documents\Scbp\Misc.\9701.685.doc.P.T.
City of Santa Clarita
Development Agreement
9701.685
November 21, 1999
Page 8
These items listed above are a few which have just come to mind; there are
others in which the City/Community will benefit as either a direct or indirect result
of the Development Agreement and construction of Santa Clarita Business Park.
Santa Clarita Business Park Co. would like to acknowledge City's Planning and
Engineering Departments for their participation and hard negotiating skills in
bringing the City, a Development Agreement, which was both fair and ingenious.
The City and SCBP can be proud that they have created a Development
Agreement, which provides amenities for the community now, instead of years
from now, if at all.
We have attached an estimated value to each of the appropriate items and have
listed their value on the enclosed Table I. The value of certain items, such as
reduction of traffic or economic effect due to increased sales and property taxes
have not been estimated or added to the summary. The summary of estimated
items total $26,171,516. Based upon these dollar estimates along with the other
benefits which no dollar amount was projected, Santa Clarita Business Park Co.
has made a substantial contribution to the community and has more than acted
in good faith and fair dealing in its development of this business park.
Santa Clarita Business Park Co.
Larry Rasmussen
Enclosure: Table I
CAMy Documents\Scbp\Misc.\9701.685.doc.P.T.
City of Santa Clarita
Development
Agreement
9701.685
November 21, 1999
Page
9
TABLE
1.
Bridge & Thoroughfare Fees For Tract 42670-02
$
5,100,000
2.
Improve Golden Valley Road
$14,441,773
3.
Improve Golden Triangle Road
$
1,200,000
4.
Streetlights
$
517,000
5.
Sidewalks
$
555,349
6.
Lot 71, Tract 42670-02
$
435,000
7.
12 -Acre Site
$
914,760
8.
Right of Way for 12 -Acre Site
$
870,000
9.
Fence DWP Right of Way
$
201,500
10.
Increase the Volume of Previously Approved Retention
Basins
$
392,154
11.
Traffic Signals at Redview Road & Golden Valley Road
and Golden Triangle Road and Golden Valley Road
$
300,000
12.
Trail from Soledad Canyon Road to Sports Complex
$
258,400
13.
Parking Lot for Sports Complex
$
257,025
14.
Below Market Sales of Lots 1 & 2 Tract 38936 for
Family & Child Development Center
$
838,600
15.
Below Market Sale of Lot 8 Tract 38936 to the William
S. Hart High School District for an Education Center
$
198,100
16.
Expedited the "No Further Action Letter" from Porta Bella
on Golden Valley Right -Of -Way
$
84,009
CAMy Documents\Scbp\Misc.\9701.685.doc.P.T.
City of Santa Clarita
Development Agreement
9701.685
November 21, 1999
Page 10
TABLE
(continued)
17. Mello -Roos Financing vs. General Obligation Bonds
18. Provide the City with $33 Million for Infrastructure Work
19. Jobs in Canyon Country
20. increase Sales Tax Revenue in Canyon Country
21. Increase in Property Tax in Canyon Country
22. Road to Golden Valley High School
23. Golden Valley Road/High School Traffic
24. Reduce Traffic Across Soledad Canyon Road
25. Traffic Mitigation on Rainbow Glen Road
26. College of the Canyons Campus
27. Direct and Indirect Economic Impact of Business Park
28. A Large Step Towards Economic Balance Between the
Eastside and Westside of Santa Clarita
29. Successful Partnership Between the Public and
Private Enterprise
* Items which have economic benefit, but whose actual value
is beyond measure.
TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE ITEMS
CAMy Documents\Scbp\Misc.\9701.685.doc.P.T.
$26,663,670