The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1999-05-11 - RESOLUTIONS - STIP AUTHORIZED PROJECTS (2)RESOLUTION NO. 99-62 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR ELIGIBLE PROJECTS AUTHORIZED UNDER THE STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (STIP) AUGMENTATION STORM DAMAGE FUNDING WHEREAS, the 1998 State Transportation Improvements Program (STIP) Augmentation Storm Damage funding provides that the 88 cities in Los Angeles County, including Los Angeles County, can use eligible funds for 1997-98 El Nifto storm damage and rehabilitation of local street and road systems; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) board ratified the Storm Damage Policy on March 25, 1999; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Clarita has met the criteria contained in the Storm Damage Policy (Attachment A) in compiling the inventory of eligible projects in the City of Santa Clarita; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Clarita desires to use its allocation of Storm Damage Policy Funding Marks (Attachment B) for the provision of eligible rehabilitation work as defined under State Highway Code Article XIX. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: To attest that the inventory of eligible projects meets the criteria contained in the Storm Damage Policy. SECTION 2. To apply for all funds available to the City of Santa Clarita allocated for local streets and road improvements. SECTION 3. To authorize the City Manager, or his designee, as the City's authorized signature and designated contact person. PASSED, APPRO v ED AND ADOPTED this 11 ATTEST: VLJ4J-- Z�- Ok-'Ia� CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 99-62 May 11, 1999 - Page 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF SANTA CLARITA I, Sharon L. Dawson, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 11 th day of May , 19 99 , by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Weste, Klajic, Ferry, Heidt, Darcy NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None CITY CLERK DK:tw councih stilomso.doe Attachment',A!, Storm Damage Policy Purpos The purpose Of this Policy is to allocate and distribute STIP funds specifically earmarked for 1997/98 El Nino storm damage and rehabilitation Of local streets and road systems. Definition Damage to streets, roads, local systems attributable to the 1997/98 "El yLno,, storms. Storm damage to include rehabilitation of systems due to accelerated damage from storms. Rehabilitation projects to include projects deemed not eligible for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or Federal Mghway Administration Emergency Relief (ER) damage on local streets and road systems attributable to storm damage. Rehabilitation work is defined as work eligible under State Mghway Code Article = Pro-.rammin�, Funds will be programmed as follows: S40 million FYOO (7/99-6/00) S 10 million FYO I (71oo-6/0 1) Allocatian of Funds ventory - The 88 cities of Los Angeles County and LOS Angeles County shall submit storm damage inventories to the MTA by May 31, 1999. Inventories shall consist of projects that meet the definition of Storm damage in priority order. Each inventory will be accompanied by a City Council resolution certifying that the damage repair or rehabilitation project meets the definition. MTA shall develop a county- wide inventory from locally generated project lists and submit the assembled Los Angeles County inventory to the CTC by July 1, 1999 for inclusion in the 1998 STIP amendment. Funds will be allocated to the cities and County of Los Angeles according to the following formula: 0 50% based On Population; 50% based on center be miles The intent Of the California Transportation Commission funds was to supplement and not replace existing local funding. Per this intent, funds allocated for 1997/998 storm damage cannot be traded or sold. Funds not claimed by a municipality will be reallocated County,hride through the formula. Nothing in this policy should discourage cities from conjoining or assigning funds to another jurisdiction (i.e. Los Angeles County) to implement work programs within that jurisdiction or between one or more jurisdictions. Population and center line miles statistics used in the formula calculation will be the most recent as obtained from the State Department of Finance. Funds must be obligated within the fiscal year allocated. All 1997/98 storm damage work must be scheduled and programmed by June 2000 for CtC allocation. Funds will be disbursed through the Caltrans Office of Local Assistance. A PSR or equivalent is required for each project, with the PSR form to be consistent with the STIP Guidelines for storm damage work. Timeline for Imniementation: LEI • May 1999, cities to submit storm damage inventories to the MTA. • June 1999, submission of Los Angeles County inventory to CTC for STIP inclusion. 0 July 1, 1999, funds available through Caltrans Local Assistance Proeram. NEXT STEP5 Concurrent with the approval process associated with this policy, notification has been sent to Los Angeles County cities apprising them of the imminent adoption of this policy and the resultant availability of funding. Early notice enabled the cities to start identifying eligible projects to include in the County -wide inventory. The individual municipal inventories will be due to the MTA at the end of May for aggregation into the LA County inventory for CTC submission. STIP funds will available July 1, 1999. Cities will be required to submit project applications through the Caltrans Office of Local Assistance. Caltrans District 7 Local Assistance is aware of the policy development and is anticipating applications. Funds will be programmed with $40 million allocated in FYOO and S10 million allocated in FY01. This method allows cities to fund "ready to go" repair projects and accumulate funds for lar.-er rehabilitation projects. Prepared by: Karen Z. Heit, Director, Strategic Policy and Planning JAINIES L. de la LOVC Executive Officer Regional Tqppspoft�tion Planning & Development Offlcc of the Chief Executive Officer Attachment "A" z Z,4 z �T4 Iwo Qj cs cs I z 04 z >4 o 40 0 o 0 CD o o o o 0 CD o 0 o oc� el� _: �6 N 00 — cn o 0 o 0 CD o <D 0 o 0 CD 0 0 0 cl� N N 0 0 C 0 o o (Z) 0 8 0 CD o kK -7 _: 0 kD �O 00 J N en C14 — qtr r14 'A , 'm r- 00 0 �c r- — -�:"�Cn 00 — 0 C� N �c r, N r� o — r, '0 " - 4 �c C, o C; -� �6 C� ,� 06 t'44 C-6 4 4 06 -A, 4 Ci Ci Ci 06 Ci C� r; --.4 %6 C -i tn �O 'Ir C4 r- 0 rn CN IT C� tn 0 m N W) r, 0 00 m kn o o C) 0 0 o o o o o o --�Jo o o o o c) o o o Ac> 0 0 0 0 o vi = o Rn CD C11 j o 0 � CD o o Ln o c) o 'r �c Rn rl- -IT 0 -.AN r, 0 CN .,;tn �O t'- t� 0 kn CN 0 r- � C; �e or C7,- c1l, r% �O 'r CN tn M O's -,I- N -,�r W -M, cc 0 0 4) ct —Cts 0 0 0 0 Q,=M===CzAduuuuuuuuu Cz �z Im a� z O� z z z ow 00 CIA 0 *9 1 ,A=r-:i r- qT -4 C� W) tn 0 CD CD CS C14 �c t ck oe . . . . . cn CD Ch 0 W) C� C14 C14 wn, IGS21"t-ng ;� 'T — 00 � eq C� N eq 00 — C4 — en �o - ' '- r-: C5 wi Cn '4q 00 r4 w'T cs C7., 00 IT AM - 0 w 00 u "o ca 4) M ba IL, r- 0 0 4 Nq c) o *0 0 (p CD C, r,. "In"A oc� -'L r- 5 0� CN r, 0 0 (D CD 0 V) 4= Q Q 0 00 t-- rq 06 C7% C-4 tn C4 t^ CN 4n tn -Z rT ce 0,� oe r.: C6 %J rt rz V. cq \0 0 w 00 u "o ca 4) M ba IL, r- 0 0 z Z.� z >4 U C) w z -tt M4 z W- u z z C> Cl (D C) Co 0 (D 0 0 C) (D eq rJ �,CYN �vs�c, w) en r- �c m tn IT C14 rq m a, cq r- M kn P::,! en N 00 00 (7, r., M -N W� N — en r, W) 00 ON �o ,,6 c)4 �6 v� C -i 4 c� 6 146 qqr 00 rq C� r- tj- 00 r- C14 C14 r- C� cz� 0 C) (p CD 0 (p (D 0 tn CD 0 (D o o c. 5 (5 0 W) c) C-4 5 o r- ON r- r- -,T W� (0 M (n cq q, �o CN 1�0 00 C= lzr 00 -:R*1 cl� vr a� C�� C-� lr� (IF r-� W� CT C-4^ Cn^ - M^ �' C N, 0 0' % n, M CN 4,21 4) 4) lu I'd ca C: > to 00 > ca —ca cw 6. a. Z F-" 40 40 Cp 40 CL Ct CL CL CL 1�. N V - w tN, cs co 0 = 0 Q on W) 0 IT V r- en C14 17 01000 CD 0 0 0 9 QO 71's CLCLCLCLC�C� - r�d CN C14 CN CN -r un MC cn W cn W V3 W 0 cn W3 &a cn V2 E: -:LA E = so .0 <.D <.D so Q CD 0 0 W% C, CN = -11, r4 �T C,4 = -M �c = 0 CD cc cc C� to 0 U x Go cs m 0 0 m CS �c = 0 CD cc cc C� to 0 U x �c = 0 CD cc cc C�