Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-08-22 - AGENDA REPORTS - N VALENCIA II PROP TAX REVENUE (2)ciTY OF sANTA CLARITA AGENDA REPORT CONSENTCALENDAR City Manager ApprovaA4"701-0 Item to be presented by: Jeffrey Lambert DATE: August 22, 2000 SUBJECT: JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA AND THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES APPROVING AND ACCEPTING NEGOTIATED EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE RESULTING FROM THE NORTH VALENCIA II ANNEXATION (MASTERCASE NO. 98-183). DEPARTMENT: Planning & Building Services RECOMMENDED ACTIO City Council to adopt a Joint Resolution of Negotiated Exchange of Property Tax Revenue resulting from the proposed North Valencia II Annexation to the City,of Santa Clarita consisting of 576 acres, generally located outside and adjacent to the City limits generally north of Newhall Ranch Road and west of McBean Parkway. On June 22, 1999, Resolution No. 99-127, was adopted initiating annexation proceedings for the North Valencia II Annexation with the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). Pursuant to State law, distribution of property tax revenue derived from the area must be negotiated and approved by a joint resolution of the City and the County of Los Angeles. The proposed resolution provides for the transfer from the County to the City of $7,284.00 in property tax revenue and portion of the annual tax increment (ATI) attributable to the Tax Rate Areas (TRA) an average of 6.2% for fiscal years commencing July 1, 2001, or the July 1 after the effective date of the annexation, whichever is later. The resolution also provides for the detachment from County Road District No. 5. A related item on this agenda is a public hearing for the election and adoption of the resolution for the storm drainage fee. ALTERNATIVE ACTION Council may direct staff to negotiate an alternative exchange or deny the proposal. Denial would result in termination of annexation proceedings. Mopted: 00 - Agenda Item—&— FISCAL IMPACT The exchange of property tax revenue proposed by the County is a weighted average of 6.2%, above the 6% required for a positive fiscal impact based on the fiscal impact analysis prepared by BRA for proposed annexation. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Vicinity Map JJL:EA:lep s: \pbs\annex\nv2\annex\agndtax