Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-10-24 - AGENDA REPORTS - REGIONAL AIRPORT PLAN (2)CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA REPORT City Manager Approva Item to be presented by: DATE: October 24, 2000 SUBJECT: REGIONAL AIRPORT PLAN FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT: Planning and Building Services RECOMMENDED ACTION Receive presentation from City of El Segundo Mayor Gordon, receive staff presentation and Provide direction based on alternative actions described below. BACKGROUND A coalition of over 95 cities, counties and governmental agencies are working to develop a regional solution to the dramatically increasing aviation demand in Southern California. The Coalition is united in support of a plan that constrains Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) to the capacity of its existing facilities and fairly distribute the benefits and burdens of air commerce in Southern California. Specifically, there is a great deal of effort to limit the proposed expansion of LAX because of concerns over excess noise, congestion, air pollution and reduced safety in overcrowded skies. New airport demand is largely a product of the projected growth in population and increases in employment in Southern California. This coalition is concerned that centralizing airport facilities at Los Angeles International Airport does not make sense when the population of Southern California becomes increasingly decentralized. They point to the several existing airports available to serve the needs of the region, which include March, Norton, George, Palm Springs, Ontario, Burbank, and Palmdale airports. It is the belief of the coalition that these airports need regional support to gain the resources they need for development in order to give them a fair share of the air commerce and marketplace. The Antelope Valley cities of Lancaster and Palmdale are not on the list of supporters of this coalition. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Adopt the attached resolution requesting a regional airport solution App°oo�JED lk�enda Item:�2.. Cities and Agencies Adopting a Regional Airport Resolution 1. Los Angeles County 50. Coachella 2. EI Segundo 51. Indian Wells 3. Gardena 52. Blythe 4. Hawthorne 53. San Bernardino County 5. Hermosa Beach 54. San Bernardino 6. Inglewood 55. Colton 7. Carson 56. Apple Valley, 8. Lawndale 57. Grand Terrace 9. Lomita 58. Big Bear Lake 10. Manhattan Beach 59. Yucca Valley 11. Palos Verdes Estates 60. Calimesa 12. Rancho Palos Verdes 61. Yucaipa 13. Redondo Beach 62. Chino Hills 14. Torrance 63. Hesperia 15. Culver City 64. Highland 16. Santa Monica 65. Adelanto 17. West Hollywood 66. Rancho Cucamonga 18. Monterey Park 67. Rialto 19. Rosemead 68. Barstow 20. Alhambra 69. Loma Linda 21. Covina 70. Twentynine Palms 22. Bellflower 71. Upland 23. Downey 72. Victorville 24. Whittier 73. Chino 25. Bell Gardens 74. Montclair 26. Huntington Park 75. Fontana 27. Bell 76. Needles 28. Cudahy 77. Redlands 29. South Gate 78. Garden Grove 30. Riverside County 31. Riverside 79. Riverside County Transportation Commission 32. Corona 80. Western Riverside Council of Governments 33. Lake Elsinore 81. San Bernardino County Association of Governments 82. Coachella Valley Assoc. 34. Moreno Valley of Governments 83. Southern California Cities Joint Pow 35. Perris 36. Hemet ers Consortium 84. March Airport Joint Powers Authority 37. Canyon Lake 85. San Bernardino International ut 86. Inland Valley Development AuthoriityJouu Powers Authority 38. Murietta 39. Norco 87. Southern California Logistics Airport 40. San Jacinto 88. Redondo Beach School District 41. Temecula 89. Manhattan Beach School District 42. Rancho Mirage 90. Inglewood Unified School District 43. Banning 91. EI Segundo Unified School District 44. Beaumont 92. Lennox School District 45. Palm Springs 46. 93. Alliance for a Regional Solution to Airport Congestion (ARSAC) 94. LAX Expansion Nol (LAXEN) Palm Desert 48. Indio 96. Communities for a Better Environment (CBE) 49. Cathedral City 97. P.A.N.LC. 98. Westside Civic Federation 2. Oppose resolutions requesting a regional airport solution 3. Refer this item to the North County Transportation Coalition for recommendation 4. Remain neutral and take no action 5. Other direction as determined by the City Council. FISCA— L IMPACT No fiscal impact can be determined at this time. &ITA— CHMENT List of Cities and Agencies Adopting a Regional Airport Resolution Resolution JJL:lep PBS/LAMBERT/AIRPORT.DOC