HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-06-13 - AGENDA REPORTS - SMD 1 ANNEX 2000-L9 BRIDGEPORT (2)CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
CONSENT CALENDAR City Manager Approval:
117:401
June 13, 2000
Item to be presented b�: Curtis Nay
SUBJECT: ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY INTO SANTA CLARITA
STREETLIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, ANNEXATION
NO. 2000-L9, TRACT NOS. 51931-01 AND 51931-02, BRIDGEPORT
DEPARTMENT: Transportation and Engineering Services
City Council adopt a resolution to initiate annexation proceedings; approve the
Engineer's Report; declare the City's intention to annex territory; and set the public hearing
for June 13, 2000.
As a condition of the approval of Tract Nos. 51931-01 and 51931-02 streetlight improvements
are required. The following property owners:
• The Newhall Land and Farming Company, a California Limited Partnership
• City of Santa Clarita
• Brookfield Bridgeport PA 2 Inc.
• Greystone Homes, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
• Centex Homes, a Nevada General Partnership
• Standard Pacific Corp., a Delaware Corporation
• D.R. Horton Inc., a Delaware Corporation
• Richmond American Homes of California, Inc., a Colorado Corporation
• Jefferson at South River, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership
• Jefferson at South River II, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership
• Hanover R.S. Limited Partnership, a Texas Limited Partnership
• Lowes HIW, Inc.
hereinafter referred to as the "Developers," have agreed to install or provide funds for all the
necessary on-site streetlight improvements as required as a condition of their tracts'
approval, and have signed a petition requesting the annexation of this streetlight
maintenance into Santa Clarita Streetlight Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation
Adopted: -I2, " 9
Its
ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
TRACT NOS. 51931-01 AND 51931-02
June 13, 2000 — Page 2
No. 2000-L9. This annexation will provide for the continued maintenance of these
improvements after they are installed and accepted by the City.
By signing the petition, the Developers have waived the noticing and right to majority protest
at the public hearing and have submitted an assessment ballot in favor of the annexation.
Thus, the public hearing for the annexation can be held on the same date as the consent
calendar item initiating the annexation. It is estimated that the improvements will be
accepted after July 1, 2000. The funds for maintenance costs will be collected on the Fiscal
Year 2000/2001 Tax Roll. The resolution declares the City's intention to annex Tract
Nos. 51931-01 and 51931-02 into Streetlight Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation
No. 2000-L9. The total proposed annual assessment is $50.00 per equivalent dwelling unit.
Currently, there are fourteen (14) parcels that will eventually be subdivided into 900 multi-
family residential units, 806 single-family residential units, 1 school site, 11 non-residential
parcels, and 56 open space parcels. The formation of this district is in compliance with
Proposition 218.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. Do not annex territory.
2. Other action as determined by City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
This annexation will provide funding for the maintenance of the
Nos. 51931-01 and 51931-02, and all subsequent tracts within this
The estimated revenues and expenditures collected from the
maintenance will be $52,287.00.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution Initiating Annexation Proceedings
Exhibit "A!'- Location Map
Petitions (available in the City Clerk's reading file)
Ballots (available in the City Clerk's reading file)
Engineer's Report (available in the City Clerk's reading file)
PY.lkl
.w\L9..a«
streetlighting for Tract
annexation's boundaries.
annexation for annual
PETITION
A PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PETITIONING SAID COUNCIL TO INITIATE
PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY INTO CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
STREETLIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 PURSUANT TO THE "LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972" BEING PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A. WHEREAS, the petitioners:
• The Newhall Land and Farming Company, (a California Limited Partnership)
• City of Santa Clarita
• Brookfield Bridgeport PA 2 Inc.
• Greystone Homes, Inc. (a Delaware Corp.)
• Centex Homes, (a Nevada General Partnership)
• Standard Pacific Corp., (a Delaware Corp.)
• D.R. Horton Inc., (a Delaware Corp.)
• Richmond American Homes of California, Inc., (a Colorado Corp.)
• Jefferson at South River, L.P., (a Delaware Limited Partnership)
• Jefferson at South River 11, L.P., (a Delaware Limited Partnership)
• Hanover R.S., Limited Partnership, (a Texas Limited Partnership)
• Lowes HIW, Inc.
(hereinafter referred to as the "Developers"), are the sole owners of that certain real property
(hereinafter referred to as the "Property") located in the City of Santa Clarita, County of Los
Angeles, State of California, (hereinafter referred to as the "City") more particularly described as
follows:
Legal Description:
Tract Map No: 51931-1 and 51931-2
Assessor Parcel Number: 2866-007.032, 042, and 044
2866-018-141
2811-001-059, 061, 119, 120, 121, and 123
2811-002-002, 044, 049, and 051
Location: Both sides of McBean Parkway South of Newhall Ranch
Road and North of Magic Mountain Parkway
B. WHEREAS, the owners are developing the Property as single family/multi-family
residential and commercial developments in the City, (hereinafter referred to as the
"Projects"); and
C. WHEREAS, in order to provide buildable sites on the Property, grading will be
necessary to comply with the Building Code of the City of, and
D. WHEREAS, the necessary grading of the Property will cause the need for
streetlighting (hereinafter referred to as the "Streetlight Improvements") to be installed by the
Developers to a standard acceptable to the City in those certain areas within the Projects which
are more particularly shown and described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto (hereinafter referred to
as the "Improvement Areas"); and
E. WHEREAS, these Streetlight Improvements must be maintained, operated, and
serviced; and
F. WHEREAS, the Developers must provide a means satisfactory to the City for
assuring the continued maintenance, operation and servicing of the Streetlight Improvements;
and
G. WHEREAS, the Improvement Areas and Streetlight Improvements must be kept
clean so as not to compromise the safety of the Streetlight Improvements; and
H. WHEREAS, as a condition of the grading and as a condition established for the
subdivision of the properties into individual lots for the specific benefit and sale to subsequent
owners, the developers and/or successors of interest were required to complete the annexation
process for inclusion into the City's Streetlight Maintenance District No. 1; and
I. WHEREAS, pursuant to the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Part
2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, the City may
establish a streetlight maintenance assessment district to provide for the continued maintenance,
operation and servicing of the streetlight improvements, and for the payment of the costs and
expenses incurred for such maintenance, operation, and servicing; and
J. WHEREAS, the Right to Vote on taxes Act, (hereinafter referred to as the "Act")
which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution requires among other things
that all new assessments must comply with the Act; and
K. WHEREAS, the Act also requires that the City Council conduct a public hearing
not less than 45 days after mailing a notice of the proposed assessment to record owners of each
parcel which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will
be imposed; and
L. WHEREAS, the California Civil Code, Section 3513, allows anyone to waive the
advantage of a law intended solely for their benefit; and
M. WHEREAS, the 45 day period before the conduct of the public hearing is not
established for a public reason but is solely for the advantage of the parcels having a special
benefit conferred upon them and which an assessment will be imposed; and
N. WHEREAS, all of the benefit is a special benefit to the properties and the parcels
to be created; and
O. WHEREAS, the proposed assessments upon the properties and the parcels to be
created will be for the special benefit to be received by the property from the improvements; and
P. WHEREAS, the Developers are the sole owners of the real property to be
benefited by the Streetlight Improvements, and the maintenance, operation, and servicing
thereof, and
Q. WHEREAS, the Act does not prohibit a waiver of the 45 day noticing period.
NOW, THEREFORE, in furtherance of the foregoing recitals, the developers do hereby
petition the City as follows:
1. In order to assure the continued maintenance, operation, and servicing of the
Streetlight Improvements, and the payment of the cost and expenses incurred for such
maintenance, operation, and servicing, the Developers hereby requests that the City annex their
Properties into City of Santa Clarita Streetlight Maintenance Assessment District No. 1 pursuant
to the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" being Part 2 of Division 15, of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California.
2. The Developers request that the territory to be annexed into City of Santa Clarita
Streetlight Maintenance Assessment District No. 1 consist of all of the property referenced in
Paragraph A of the recitals hereinabove. The total annual assessment shall be divided among the
parcels of the Property in accordance with benefit received. Such assessment may be increased
annually by an amount corresponding to the increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), all
Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles -Anaheim -Riverside area. If the assessment is not
increased by a CPI in some years, the amount may be increased in subsequent years by an
amount corresponding to the cumulative increases in the CPI.
3. As the owner of all of the real property to be placed into the District, the
Developers hereby waive all statutory notices of hearings and rights of majority protests by
interested property owners in the proposed Annexation per Section 22608 of the Streets and
Highways Code.
4. As the owners of all of the real property, which receives a special benefit and is
the only property proposed to be assessed for the special benefit, the Developers hereby waive all
statutory notice periods per the Act.
5. In consideration of the approval of the Annexation into the District by the City,
the Developers hereby propose as follows:
a. To install Streetlight Improvements (including, but not limited to, all
appurtenances as may be reasonably required by the City;
b. To bear all costs to complete the construction or other installation of the
Streetlight Improvements on those portions of the Property to the reasonable satisfaction
of the City;
C. To consent to the Annexation into the District;
d. To consent to, and cast a ballot authorizing the levy of assessments against
the Property in an amount reasonably determined by the City to cover all costs and
expenses incurred for the continued maintenance, operation, and servicing of the
Streetlight Improvements
e. To pay the assessments levied against the Property for the first fiscal year
in which they are levied prior to the submittal to the City Council of any associated final
subdvision map.
:.__ 1 e
DEVELOP RS
Valen is Co pany Kevin C. Farr
Date
City of Santa Clarita
Date
Brookfield Bridgeport PA 2 Inc.
Date
Greystone Homes, Inc. (a Delaware Corp.)
Date
Centex Homes, (a Nevada General Partnership)
Date
Standard Pacific Corp., (a Delaware Corp.)
Date
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
) ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
May 3, 2000, before me, Renate Hahn, the undersigned notary, personally appeared Kevin C. Farr,
personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature
on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the
instrument
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
1� RENATE HAHN i
COMM. 11211405
y NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
My Comm. I Tres Feb. 21, 2003 �+
FOR VALENCIA COMPANY
win\word\ack.doc
Renate Hahn
NOTARY PUBLIC
HAY 30 '00 15;06 TO -16612540761 FROH-RROOKFIELD HHS
Vai�peis Car�aAy
Dose
Ciyr dS�oq CWiSa
r
Dw
PA 2 —�
Je rey J. Prostor
Das
amyfm00 s mrs, IpC. a J]�laanue Cad-)
CoM ROOM (a Navlda GWs d P*Mad ip)
Dw
T-734 P.05/06 F-761
MAY 30 '00 15:06 TO -16612540761 FROM-BROOHFIELD HHS
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT=
State of CPA r-vQ�i (-
County of Q 6n I'b E
On S �VD I () D before me, S &JI
DY
T-734 P.08/08 F-761
Dat N=W PuNin
personally appearedlj -��u _-� W/Y_0 �1 TUY —
_ �_ 1-1 �'
personally known to me — OR — ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the per 3on(s)
whose names) Ware subscribed to the within instr orient
and acknowledged to me that heAshallhey execut rd the
same in hismedtheir authorized capecity(ies), and 1 hat by
histhedtheir signature(s) on the instrument the pen on(a),
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
J7 SANDRA P. WOM executed the instrument.
cointnidon i M111
� w„orPrmte—caltarda
Aryporm="c"* WITNESS my
OPTIONAL
Though rhe irdammi0on bebw Is not required by lass R MYPMVe valuable to pawn ratyby on the doa~t and could, Havant
rraudrr W removal Arid reaaaeh MI or this brm to 84e111W domm"
Descriptlon of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capecity(les) Claimed by Signers)
Signer's Name:
9 ■
Individual
Corporate Officer
Inde(.):
Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General
Attorney -in -Fact
Trustee
Guardian or Conservator
Other.
Signer Is Representing:
Brookfield Bridgeport PA
Signer's Name:
8
Number of Papa: _
Individual
Corporate Officer
Title(:):
Partner —❑ Umited ❑ General
Attorney -In -Fact
Trustee
Guardian or Conservator
Other.
Signer Is Representing:
O tYW N�tlanO rM1uY ArOMllan • aY71 MI111N1Mq., P.Q ae. Tat. D+ea PYA C1 al]oF71M
P,ed Ilo. e1oT Ra>wef. Gr' r4FIM 1�lOaE7safi47
DEVELOPERS/OWNERS
Valencia Company
Date
City of Santa Clarita
Date
Brookfield Bridgeport PA 2 Inc.
Date
Greystone H es, Inc. (a Delaware Corp.)
Bruce T. Crable
S /-oy
Date
Centex Homes, (a Nevada General Partnership)
Date
Standard Pacific Corp., (a Delaware Corp.)
Date
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of Los
On May 4, 2000 before me, Lori Bruce, Notary Public
Date Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary Public")
personally appeared Bruce T. Crable
Namels) of Signers)
EXpersonally known to me — OR — ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person;Es)
whose name(D) is/a(t}E; subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he/8tfa( ley executed the
same in his/J61 MIM authorized capacity(igtjo, and that by
his/H11YM signatur@(s) on the instrument the personQ@),
or the entity upon behalf of which the persona) acted,
too BRACE executed the instrument.
1122656
N*lFf Riaw—cowrlla
Log AM" Coury WITNESS my hand and official seal.
My 0=M 8"« Apr 29.2001
Signature of Notary Public
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: Santa Clarita Street Light Maintenanra Ballot
Document Date: May 4. 2000 Number of Pages: 10
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name:
Bruce T. Crable
Individual
Corporate Officer V. P.
Title(s):
Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General
Attorney -in -Fact
Trustee
Guardian or Conservator
of Operations
❑ Other:
Signer Is Representing:
Greystone Homes, Inc.
RIGHT THUMBPRINT
OF SIGNER
Signer's Name:
❑
El
Ej
❑I
El
Individual
Corporate Officer
Title(s):
Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General
Attorney -in -Fact
Trustee
Guardian or Conservator
Other:
Signer Is Representing
RIGHT THUMBPRINT
OF SIGNER
LN
w m,,b ,miomai Norary Associanon • b[4b Nemmet Ave., FU. box (164 • Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 Prod, No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1-800-876-6827
MAY -08-2000 MON 03:05 PM CENTEX HOMES -VALENCIA FAX NO. 805 288 5785
L)EVELOPERS/OWNERS
Valencia Company
Date
City of Santa Clarita
Date
Brookfield Bridgeport PA 2 Inc.
Greystone Ilomes, Inc. (a Delaware Corp,)
Jay Kopel
Ce to I in , Ncvada General Partnership)
Date
Standard Pacific Corp., (a Delaware Corp.)
Date
P. 13/15
MAY -08-2000 MON 03:06 PM CENTEX HOMES -VALENCIA FAX N0, 805 288 5785
I . eil.nnnce AllKillinwit-EDG HENT
State of Califqrn"i
� A 5S.
MC
County of
0n `�_� ! ��_._, before me,
n�ln r—
personally appeared _QL,,�
m9
Xpersonally known to me
L] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence
to be the personA whose name() is/a/6
subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/sp4/ltgy executed
the same in his/h/dth�lr authorized
capacity(io and that by hisil/r/1K.,ir
I� MARIKA SMIiH '�I signature(4 on the instrument the I onW, or
COMM. N1152695 m the entity upon behalf of which the person(Oj
NOTARY PUBLIC - r,A1 IPORNIA 2
w LOS ANGL't.ES COUNTY acted, executed the instrument.
toy Comm. EipLoe Aq. 23, 2001 1I
MNS= d nd official— ,
f9.lyp Notary 5001 AJ -W ry $,1{n4Wp pf 14PUpl¢
OPTIONAL
Though file Information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could pro✓ent frmrdulcnt removal and reattachmonf of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Docurt L
Title or Type of Docue"mr�ent: __, .._ 'e.�a--d��:�i�—.•- .-•
Document Date: N..��G ---- Number of Pages: —(
Signer(s) other Than Named Above:.�•-----
Capacity(ios) Claimed by Signer
Signer's Name: _....—
❑ Individual Ion ouhumu hem
C.1 Corporate officer—Tido(s): „___...... _..-,...—_.—.-•--- —
Ll Partner- -I.1 Limited I1 General
1.1 Attorney in Fact
I':1 Trustee
I"1 Guardian or Conservator
Centex Homes
Signor Is Representing -.... _...---._...._—..._ _ ..--
0 11,7 N:,tlenaj N,Wny ALSOcli'U", , 9150 D, sol„ A.o., P.O. fin- 2402 - Cna,:wnnn, en 0,a,a as ua , ... .•, •.1.,1
P. 14/15
MAY. 3.2000 1:54PM VALENCIA CO
DEVELOPERS/OWNERS
Valencia Company
Date
City of Santa Clarita
Date
Brookfield Bridgeport PA 2 Inc.
Date
Greystone Homes, Inc, (a Delaware Corp,)
Date
Centex Homes, (a Nevada General Partnership)
T..we
Casey
NO. 524 P.9
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of Los Angeles
On May 8th, 2000 before me, Deborah Anne Daniels Notary Public
�- Name Nal Two d offim (e.g.,'dmw ooa, No" Publle )
personally appeared _ --'**Dale F. Casey*Y
Nam,ta) d 91grar)e)
® personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) isMUsubscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he/0y executed the
DEBORAH ANNE DANES
Commission e 1184872
Notary
r� mf
✓ Los An3e!es County
nnyCcmm.E
same in hiSANDMauthorized capacity(ies), and that by
hisCsignature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
rzeslvta- – –
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
'.----------- I , I / i.. .
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required bylaw, It may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name:
Individual
Corporate Officer
Title(s):
Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General
Attorney -in -Fact
Trustee
Guardian or Conservator
❑ Other:
Signer is Representing:
Standard Pacific Corp.
Signer's Name:
A
Number of Pages:
Individual
Corporate Officer
Title(s):
Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General
Attorney -in -Fact
Trustee
Guardian or Conservator
Other:
Signer is Representing:
. ,.n�.ri-, nw., rv. eo. „w •,vxp- rarR,,;n ul: nm Pmd No. 5907 Roortler. Cal TdFFne 1-000476-8827
05/03/2000 10:34 661513969'0 DR HORTON PAGE e9
D.R. Horton Inc., (a Delaware Corp.) yl/mss
O
Date
Theodore C. Bolden
Richmond American Homes of California, Inc., (a Colorado Corp.)
Date
Jefferson at South River, L.P., (a Delaware Limited Partnership)
Date
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
ya ate" ss.
County of J
On I I HA before me, Af K Q 4,6N I0,07AP 81 - G,
Date �1 Name and I In- of Mica, nt.g., Jane Doe, Notary Public')
personally appeared C, (�f,
Name(s) of Signers) '
CLAUDE R. MULLEN
Commission # 1243455
- Notary Public - California
Ventura County
My t :omrn. Eyiw,s Dec 20, 2IIi
❑ personally known to me
LKproved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence
to be the person( whose name(-) is/ase
subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/stfm" executed
the same in his/ht0tl:mir authorized
capacity(iesl, and that by his/hes&kr r
signature() on the instrument the person(*), or
the entity upon behalf of which the person(o
acted, executed the instrument.
WITNE S my hand and official seal.
Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Public
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached DoqMment
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date: S O _OO
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Number of Pages: q_
Signer's Name) Claimed by Signer
Signer's Name:
Individual Top or m mn Here
11 Corporate Officer — Title(s):
❑ Partner —❑ Limited ❑ General
❑ Attorney in Fact
❑ Trustee
❑ Guardian or Conservator
❑ Other: T
Signer Is Representing: i4DRTpA AJC,
- -1 ..a1....... m., n 'ou'aucn •naso oe e= Ave., KU. box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91313-2402 Prod. No, 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1-800-876-6627
D.R. Horton Inc., (a Delaware Corp.)
Date
000'.
Richmond American Homes of California, Inc., (a Colorado Corp.)
Wm. Steven Seemann
4V3/04
Date
Jefferson at South River, L.P., (a Delaware Limited Partnership)
Date
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of LI I A r g l k
County of Lys -Awi G P u S cc..
On 5- if - 0 0 before me, &,o- Fz r e? q 5 / e-
%^
Date Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary Public)
personally appeared
ylWersonally known to me - OR - Elproved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
/ whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the
SUE FORNASIER same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
GommiloilOnR tett his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
NotalPtt>Iic-Colfforria £ or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
Las Angeles county
�NcL/49D,?Um executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary Public
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name:
❑
El
Individual
Corporate Officer
Title(s):
Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General
Attorney -in -Fact
Trustee
Guardian or Conservator
Other:
Signer Is Representing:
Richmond American Homes
California Inc.
Signer's Name:
L1
■
Number of Pages:
Individual
Corporate Officer
Title(s):
Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General
Attorney -in -Fact
Trustee
Guardian or Conservator
Other:
Signer Is Representing:
RIGHT TRUh7BPRINT
OF SIGNERIII
s ........ - n, 11P- n n , r u. eo+ r i oc • Canoga Vara, UA 913094164 Prod. No. 5907 Roomer; Call Toll -Free 1-800-8]6-682]
D.R. Horton Inc., (a Delaware Corp.)
Date
Richmond Arnerican Homes of California, Inc.. (a Colorado Corp.)
Date
Jefferson at South River, L.P., (a Delaware Limited Partnership)
By: Jefferson South River LLC
By: ` oC
Date Vice Presiden
Scot McLaughlin
Jefferson at South River II, L.P., (a Delaware Limited Partnership)
By: Jefferson South River IT LLC
By: <
Date Vice President
Scot McLaughlin
Hanover R.S. Limited Partnership, (a Texas Limited Partnership)
Date
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State'b
County
On f��beb
fore m��L
TE Name
personally appeared �1 6'T IkaL,
personally known to me — OR ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),or
the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITN y hand and official seal.
zr
GNAT OF NOTARY
000000000000000000000000000000
`e SHERRY GOODWIN 1
Notary Public, State of Texas g
`•; .•.... 4V My Commission Exp. 08-10-2002
Lo0000000000000000000000000000
OPTIONAL SECTION
THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE
DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Title Or Type Of Document
- OPTIONAL SECTION -
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY
SIGNER
Though statute does not Mute the Notary to fill
aI the data below. doing to ^W wove al aluablo
to persons ral)Oq W aw doaamnt.
❑ INDIVIDUAL -
❑ CORPORATE OFFICER(S)
TITLE(S)
❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED
❑ GENERAL
❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
❑ TRUSTEE(S)
❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
❑ OTHER:
SIGNER IS
REPRESENTING
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)
Jefferson at South
River L.P.
Ttw Oa* data reWested bele is not ragwed by law. it pw,ld prevent Number of Pages Date of Document
fr&Auwd reetadiment or Me fpm.
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above
L LIBJUIO 293.e5(aN1FIe1.13OQ
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
County
O ZcvO before f�(/L
DATE - W " eltne Omoer—e.q.'.
personally appeared �dO;r/�.Lif ee'rG/N
personally known to me — OR ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),or
the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
hand and official seal.
OF NOTARY
SHERRY WOUNIN
Notary Public, State of Texas
V Commission Exp. 08-10-2002
OPTIONAL SECTION
THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE
DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Title or Type of Document
ThmiM the d" reopested nxe is wl.equired by law, It CNAI prevent Number of Pages
heudutex resaatllmplt W die larm.
LANuatUlOVJTSde.ee(DK "51.DOQ
— OPTIONAL SECTION —
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY
SIGNER
TftO etetute Case not MqM he NaWy to 60
in the data beim. dowo so may pave invelwbk
WPersane relY4q On the document.
❑ INDIVIDUAL
❑ CORPORATE OFFICER(S)
TITLE(S)
❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED
❑ GENERAL
❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
❑ TRUSTEE(S)
❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
❑ OTHER:
SIGNER IS
REPRESENTING
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITYnES)
Jefferson at South
$iv r TT T.,p-
Date of Document
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above
uo/uo/uu 11: L1 tdA ,
D.R. Horton Inc., (a Delaware Corp.)
Date
Richmond American Homes of California, Inc., (a Colorado Corp.)
Date
Jefferson at South River, L.P., (a Delaware Limited Partnership)
By: Jefferson South River LLC
By:_
Date
Jefferson at South River R, L.P., (a Delaware Limited Partnership)
By: Jefferson South River II LLC
By__
Date
Riverwalk at Town Center, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership
By: THC/West Coast Division Limited Partnership,
a Texas limited partnership, its general partner
By: Hanover G.P. LLC, a Texas limited liability company,
its general partner
Name' 6ywy if
VICE P: 109
•: aqi
C. UUtl/UUtl
uoi VO, uu 14.41 raA QUU Iiuue
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF HARRIS
On this thee day of , 2000, before me, Drusilla A. Phelps,
a Notary Public in and for said Coun and State, personally appeared Kathy K. Biuford,
personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that she executed the same in her authorized capacity, and that by her
signature on the instrument, the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted,
executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Qvwrr�.irrrA..vr..eT.rr.9
G�_N DARYPM.A A. PHELPSNOTMy COM LISSION E FIRES 3MY OOMMISSION E%PIRESh APRIL 17,
rrrr�eu�2003
rrrriirirrySigns ofNotar
Y
FOR HANOVER G.P. LLC
'u. ��
Lowes HIW, Inc.
Michael Shiles
Date
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No. 5907
State of
County of
On I c before me, _ 4'1
DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., NE bOE, NOTARY
personally appeared
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
C,ipersonally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the personN whose name(�6(0o6
subscribed to the within instrument and ac-
knowledged to me tha a s)(e/tIXy executed
the same in isD r/t[-p6jr authorized
capacity(i s), and that by(9i h`) r/ttWr
signatureoQ on the instrument the personK,
or the entity upon behalf of which the
personM acted, executed the instrument.
,. LINDA PERRY WITNESS my hand aTill-/
al seal.
CONK 0 119780.3
NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNA
SAN DIEGO COUNTY 0
MM.
COEXP. OCT.
SIGNATURE OF NOTARY
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
❑ INDIVIDUAL
❑ CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE(S)
❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED
❑ GENERAL
❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
❑ TRUSTEE(S)
❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
❑ OTHER:
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
I
NUMBER OF PAGES
L:(Z(�(tO
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
N OFTRY(/
Vo_)L G_or
f ,,,l
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
01993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION - 8236 Remmel Ave., P.O. Box 7184 - Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
ANNEXATION NO. 2000-L9 INTO
STREETLIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Tract No. 51981-01 and -02
FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001
SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA
SUBMITTED
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
ANNEXATION NO. 2000-L9
STREETLIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Tract No. 51931-01 and -02
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I.
Introduction
1
II.
Plans and Specifications
3
III.
Estimated Costs of the Improvements
3
IV.
Assessment Diagram
5
V.
Assessment
5
VI.
Method of Assessment
5
VII.
Certifications
13
Appendices
A
Assessment Diagram
15
B
Assessment Roll
16
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
ANNEXATION NO. 2000-L9 INTO
STREETLIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Tract No. 51931-01 and 02
I. INTRODUCTION
This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, of the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") which is Part
2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code. This report considers the
annexation of territory to be known as Annexation No. 2000-L9, Tract No. 51931-01 and
-02, into the existing Streetlight Maintenance District No. 1.
Pursuant to the Act, the City Council is the legislative body for the District and may annex
territory and levy annual assessments acting as the governing body for the operations and
administration of the District.
In addition, the Act provides for the levy of annual assessments after annexation into or
formation of an assessment district for the continued maintenance and servicing of the
district improvements. The Act further allows various areas to be annexed into an existing
district when the territory in the annexation receives substantially the same degree of
benefit from the improvements. The costs associated with the installation, maintenance,
and service of the improvements may be assessed to those properties, which are benefited
by the installation, maintenance, and service.
Section 22608 of the Streets and Highways Code further states that annexation
proceedings will be limited to the territory proposed to be annexed into an existing district.
This report will be limited to those properties associated with Tract No. 51931-01 and -02
as shown on Appendix "A."
RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXES ACT (PROPOSITION 218)
On November 5, 1996, the electorate approved Proposition 218, Right to Vote on Taxes Act,
which added articles XIII C and XIII D to the California Constitution. The Proposition
affects all assessments upon real property for a special benefit conferred on the property.
Assessments imposed under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 are these types of
benefit assessments.
As written, Proposition 218 exempts assessments for street purposes. The maintenance
services in Streetlight Maintenance District No. 1 are for streetlights. They are an integral
part of the entire street, the same as curb, gutters, pavement, signage and striping. Taken
as a group, they are the elements that provide a safe route for motorists.
Streetlights are installed to make streets safer. Streetlights are installed to provide better
visibility for drivers. One hundred (100) percent of the illumination from the lights is
directed to the street, ninety (90) percent on the street side of the curb and ten (10) percent
behind the curb. The spacing of the lights is based on the speed of the vehicles and the
natural ability of the motorists' eyes to adjust to light and dark areas.
Streetlights are installed on and for street purposes and are maintained and serviced to
allow the street to perform to the standards it was designed. Assessments for the
maintenance and servicing of streets must include streetlights and is exempt under the
provisions of Proposition 218.
Each property owner who owns parcels subject to the assessment will be sent an
Assessment Ballot requesting their approval to annex into the district and approve the
assessments being imposed. Subsequent owners of parcels would be made aware through
title reports and Department of Real Estate "White Paper" reports that the parcels are in
the district and subject to the assessments. Purchase of the parcel(s) is also an agreement
by the new owners to be subject to the assessments. However, subsequent increases, if
any, will be subject to the procedures and approval process of Section 4 of Article XIII D.
This report is being provided to show that there will be no proposed increase in the
assessments to pay for costs incurred for maintenance, servicing and operation of the
existing District. However, the assessments will be proposed for the first time to those
parcels proposed to be included in this annexation.
The City may initiate proceedings for the annexation of territory for continued
maintenance and servicing of streetlight improvements by passing a resolution. This
Resolution of Intention generally describes the territory to be annexed into the district and
any proposed new improvements or any substantial changes in existing improvements and
orders an engineer to prepare and file a detailed report.
This report prepared by the engineer details only the proposed annexation to the existing
district and must include: plans and specifications of the improvements; an estimate of the
costs of the improvements, including maintenance and servicing; a diagram, i.e., map of
the assessment district showing the boundary of the district and annexation; the parcels or
lots which benefit, and an estimate of costs of the improvements, maintenance and
servicing. Once the report is completed, it is presented to the City Council (the legislative
body) for its review and approval as presented, or may be modified and approved.
After the report is approved, the City adopts the Resolution of Intention which declares its
intent to annex territory and levy and collect assessments, describes the improvements,
including maintenance and servicing, refers to the assessment district and annexation by
its distinctive designation, refers to the report for the details of the district and annexation,
and sets a time and place for a public hearing on the levy of the proposed assessment.
Following the initial Council Meeting, the City will send an Assessment Ballot with which
the property owners can vote on the annexation and assessment.
At the public hearing, the City will count the Assessment Ballots returned and consider the
public testimony in favor of and/or opposing the annexation and assessment. At that time,
the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming and levying the assessments to fund
the maintenance and servicing of the improvements or abandon the proposed annexation.
2
Assessments, if authorized, would be placed on the 2000/2001 County Tax Roll and would
be collected with the regular County property taxes. Reserve funds in the current district
would be used to fund the maintenance and service until assessment funds are distributed
by the County Tax Collector in December of 2000.
II. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The proposed improvements for Annexation No. 2000-L9 into Streetlight Maintenance
District No. 1, include, but are not limited to, and may be generally described as follows:
Streetlight improvements are owned either by the Southern California Edison Company,
the State of California Department of Transportation, or the City of Santa Clarita.
Facilities constructed for or by the City of Santa Clarita are on file in the City offices.
Proposed streetlight facilities are located within and around the perimeter of Tract
Nos. 51931-01 and -02, located in the vicinity of the Newhall Ranch Road and
McBean Parkway in the City of Santa Clarita. Streetlights along McBean Parkway,
Magic Mountain Parkway and Newhall Ranch Road will be standard streetlights while
streetlights located within the individual developments will be of a more decorative nature.
Plans and Specifications for the improvements for Annexation No. 2000-L9 to the
Streetlight Maintenance District are voluminous and are not bound in this report but by
this reference are incorporated and made a part of this report. The plans and
specifications are on file at the City.
III. ESTIMATED COSTS OF THE IMPROVEMENTS
The Act provides that the estimated costs of the improvements shall include the total cost
of the improvements for Fiscal Year 2000/2001, including incidentals, which may include
reserves to operate the District until funds are transferred to the City from the County
around December 10 of the next fiscal year.
The Act also provides that the amount of any surplus, deficit or contribution be included in
the estimated cost of improvements. The net amount to be assessed on the lots or parcels
within each district is the total cost of installation, maintenance and servicing with
adjustments either positive or negative for reserves, surpluses, deficits and/or
contributions.
Estimated costs of improvements for Streetlight Maintenance District No. 1, including
Annexation No. 2000-L9, are voluminous and are not bound in this report but by this
reference are incorporated and made a part of this report. The estimated costs are on file
at the City where they are available for public inspection.
3
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
ANNEXATION NO. 2000-L9 INTO
STREETLIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
Tract No. 51931-01 and -02
2000/2001 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET ESTIMATE
CURRENT ASSESSMENT LOTS OR PARCELS: 14
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS and
TYPE OF LAND USE: 900 Multi -Family Residential, 806 Single Family Residential, 1
School Site, 11 non-residential, and 56 Open Space
Reference is made to the assessment roll included herein as Appendix "B" for individual
parcel assessments.
4
TOTAL
BUDGET ITEM
DISTRICT
Total Funds Required
$52,287.00
Available Carryover
$ 0.00
Other Revenue
$ 0.00
To be Raised by Parcel Assessment
$52,287.00
Reference is made to the assessment roll included herein as Appendix "B" for individual
parcel assessments.
4
W. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The boundary map/diagram is included herein as "Appendix A" is part of this report.
V. ASSESSMENT
All assessed lots or parcels of real property within the annexation are listed on the
Assessment Roll which is on file at the City and is hereby made a part of this report by
reference. The assessment roll states the net amount to be assessed upon assessable lands
within Annexation No. 2000-L9 for Fiscal Year 2000/2001, shows the Fiscal Year 2000/2001
assessment upon each lot and parcel within the annexation, and describes each assessable
lot or parcel of land within the annexation. These lots and parcels are more particularly
described in the County Assessment Roll, which is on file in the office of the Los Angeles
County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this report as "Appendix B".
Commencing with Fiscal Year 2001/2002, the amount of the assessments for Annexation
No. 2000-L9 will include a yearly increase, based upon the Consumer Price Index, All
Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles -Anaheim -Riverside Area ("CPI"), as determined by
the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The
engineer shall compute the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year
and the CPI for the previous March, and shall then adjust the existing assessment by an
amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of
Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the
engineer shall use the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City
Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living.
VI. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
BACKGROUND
The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 provides that assessments may be apportioned
upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within an assessment district or annexation in
proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the
improvements. In addition, Proposition 218 requires that a parcel's assessment may not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. The
Proposition provides that only special benefits are assessable, and the City must separate
the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel. A special benefit is a
particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on the public at
large, including real property within the district or annexation. The general enhancement
of property value does not constitute a special benefit.
SPECIAL BENEFIT
The City, in determining the necessity of annexing territory into the existing streetlight
maintenance district, took into account the cost of providing services to the residents,
businesses and properties located within the annexation. Each and every parcel within the
annexation, receives a particular and distinct benefit from the improvements over and
above general benefits conferred by the improvements.
5
In the existing District the streetlight improvements were installed by the developers,
subdividers of the land, and the continued maintenance was guaranteed through the
establishment of a Streetlight Maintenance District. If the installation of the
improvements and the guaranteed maintenance did not occur, the lots would not have been
established and could not have been sold to any distinct and separate owner. The
establishment of each distinct and separate lot is a special benefit which permits the
construction of a building or structure on the property and the ownership and sale of the
distinct lot in perpetuity.
In the annexation all the lots are established at the same time once the conditions
regarding the improvements and the continued maintenance are guaranteed. As a result,
each lot within the district receives a special and distinct benefit from the improvements
and to the same degree.
The improvements also continue to confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon
parcels within the annexation because of the nature of the improvements. The proper
maintenance of the streetlighting and appurtenant facilities specially benefit parcels
within the annexation. The proper maintenance of the streetlighting, and appurtenant
facilities reduces property -related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the
annexation. The streetlighting located in Streetlight Maintenance District No. 1 and the
proposed Annexation No. 2000-L9 helps to visually join the various segments of the
community, which enhance property. All of the above-mentioned contributes to a specific
enhancement of the property values of each of the parcels within the annexation.
In addition, the benefit provided by streetlighting consists of safety for pedestrians and
motorists involved with the property in the Annexation during the nighttime hours. This
is a distinct and special benefit to all developed parcels in the annexation.
Streetlighting can be determined to be an integral part of streets as a permanent public
improvement. One of the principal purposes of fixed roadway lighting is to create a
nighttime environment conducive to quick, accurate, and comfortable seeing for the user of
the facility. These factors, if attained, combine to improve traffic safety and achieve
efficient traffic movement. Fixed lighting can enable the motorist to see detail more
distinctly and to react safely toward roadway and traffic conditions present on or near the
roadway facility.
Streets are constructed for the safe and convenient travel by vehicles and pedestrians.
They also provide an area for underground and overhead utilities.
Streetlights are installed on and are for street purposes and are maintained and serviced
to allow the street to perform to the standards it was designed. Assessments for the
maintenance and servicing of streets, may include streetlights.
Streetlights are considered an integral part of the entire street, the same as curb, gutters,
pavement, signage and striping. Taken as a group, they are the elements that provide a
safe route for motorists and pedestrians. Streetlights are installed to make streets safer.
Streetlights are installed to provide better visibility for drivers. One hundred (100) percent
of the illumination from the lights is directed to the street, ninety (90) percent on the street
11
side of the curb and ten (10) percent behind the curb. The spacing of the lights is based on
the design speed of the street and the natural ability of the motorist's eyes to adjust to
light and dark areas.
The system of streets adjacent to the annexation is established to provide access to each
parcel in the annexation. Streetlights provide a safer street environment for owners of the
parcels served. If the parcels were not subdivided to provide individual parcels to owners
within the annexation, there would be no need for a system of streets with safety lighting.
The City has determined that streetlights are also an integral part of the quality of life
within the City. This quality of life is a special benefit to some degree to all parcels, except
government owned parcels, including easements, and flood channel parcels.
GENERAL BENEFIT
In addition to the special benefits received by the parcels within the proposed annexation,
there are incidental general benefits conferred by the proposed improvements.
The benefit to properties for streetlighting on the City's streets is a benefit to all parcels
within the City. All parcels share equally the cost of the streetlights.
The total benefits are thus a combination of the special benefits to the parcels within the
annexation and the general benefits to the public at large and to adjacent property owners.
The portion of the total streetlight maintenance costs which are associated with general
benefits will not be assessed to the parcels in the district, but will be paid from other City
Funds.
It is estimated that the general benefit portion of the benefit received from the
improvements for any annexation is less than one (1) percent of the total benefit.
Nonetheless, the City has agreed to ensure that no property is assessed in excess of the
reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that property.
Since the installation of streetlights is for the express, special benefit of the parcels within
the annexation and since each and every parcel within the annexation receives a particular
and distinct benefit from the improvements, there is considered no general benefits
conferred by the improvements to the public at large.
APPORTIONMENT
For Fiscal Year 2000/2001 Annexation No. 2000-L9 to the Streetlight Maintenance District
No.1 will adopt the current rate schedule as used by the existing district.
The Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that lighting assessments may be
apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or
parcels within the district/annexation in proportion to the estimated benefits received. The
primary benefits of streetlighting are for the convenience, safety, and protection of people
and to a lesser extent the security or protection or property, property improvements, and
goods. The intensity or degree of illumination provided can have a bearing on both.
7
The proposed assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2000/2001 is proposed to be $50.00 per
equivalent dwelling unit (EDU). The following information can be used to determine the
unit count per parcel.
Based on land use information provided by the County Assessor, it has been determined
that in the existing district over 93 percent of the parcels are in a residential category.
Approximately 83 percent are single-family homes or condominiums and the remainder are
duplexes, triplexes, or apartments. In view of this and the benefits derived by the family
unit, both at and in the proximity of their property, a value of one has been assigned to the
basic family unit or Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU), i.e. the single-family home or
condominium. The existing district includes some properties that may not actually have
streetlights in their block but which do receive a neighborhood benefit from the lights in
the area. These properties were also included in the district. Therefore, a value of V2 was
given to "People Use" while "Intensity" and "Security Benefit" were each rated at 1/4 to
form the basic unit. Parcels in other land use categories were then rated by comparison
with the basic EDU.
In the remainder of the residential category, which is comprised of multiple rental type
properties, the value for Intensity would remain at 1/4 but the other two items would
increase in proportion to the number of family dwelling units on the parcel. For example, a
duplex was assigned 1/4 for Intensity, 1 for People Use and 1/2 for Security Benefit for a
total of 1-3/4 EDU's. The owner of such property would therefore pay 1-3/4 times as much
for lighting as the owner of a single-family unit. In consideration of the distance some
units would be from the lighted roadway, Security Benefits in the residential category
would not be increased beyond a value of one. Thus, a five -unit apartment would be
assigned 1/4 for Intensity, 2-1/2 for People Use and one for Security Benefits for a total of
3-3/4 EDU's. As the number of apartments on a parcel increases, the service charge units
assigned for people would follow a declining scale as follows:
21 through 50 apartments
Units for 20 apartments plus 1/3 unit for each apartment over 20.
For example: 20 apartments = 1/4 for intensity, 10 for people and 1 for security =
11-1/4 EDU's
For example: 50 apartments = (50-20)/3 = 10; 11-1/4 +10 = 21-1/4 EDU's
50 through 100 apartments
Units for 50 apartments plus 1/4 unit for each apartment over 50.
For example: 100 apartments = (100-50)/4 = 12 1/2; 21-1/4 + 12 1/2 = 33-1/4 EDU's
Over 100 Apartments
Units for 100 apartments plus 1/5 unit for each apartment over 100
For example: 200 apartments = (200-100)/5 = 20; 33-3/4 + 20 = 53-3/4 EDU's
Reference is made to the annual Engineer's Report, on file with the City, for the
Santa Clarita Streetlight Maintenance District No. 1, Fiscal Year 1999/2000 for details on
the land use categories and benefit units assigned to them.
0
For the single-family units the annual assessment will be $50 per EDU per year. For the
non-residential parcels the annual assessment will be $50 per EDU per year. For the
Apartment units the annual assessment will be as follows:
(900-100)/5 = 160; 33-3/4 + 160 = 193-3/4 EDU's X $50 = $9,688 for the entire development
or $10.76 per apartment unit.
The remaining non-residential parcels would be placed into the following appropriate
categories:
The remaining seven percent of the lots or parcels were separated into 38 land use
categories as determined by the County Assessor and units were assigned on the basis of
average benefits received as follows:
GROUP A
Rating Breakdown:
1 EDU (minimum charge for improved property)
Property Type:
1. Irrigated Farms
2. Dry farms
3. Cemeteries
4. Dump sites
GROUP B
Ratine Breakdown
Moderate intensity lighting 1/2
Nominal people use 1
Moderate security benefit 1/2
Total 2 EDU's
Property Type:
1. Animal kennels
2. Nurseries and greenhouses
3. Parking lots (industrial)
4. Churches
5. Schools (private)
6. Petroleum and gas
7. Utility
GROUP C
Ratine Breakdown:
High intensity lighting 1
Nominal people use 1
Moderate security benefit 1/2
Total 2-1/2 EDU's
0
Property Type:
1. Parking lots (commercial)
GROUP D
Rating Breakdown:
High intensity lighting
Nominal people use
High security benefit
Total
Property Type:
1. Office building
2. Professional building
3. Banks, savings, and loans
4. Service shops
5. Lumber yards
6. Golf Courses
7. Race tracks/stables
8. Camps
9. Homes for the aged
GROUP E
Ratine Breakdown:
High intensity lighting
Moderate people use
High security benefit
Total
Property Type:
1. Stores
2. Store w/office or residence
3. Service stations
4. Clubs and lodge halls
GROUP F
Rating Breakdown:
Nominal intensity lighting
High people use
High security benefit
Total
1
3 EDU's
1
4 EDU's
U4
1
4-1/4 EDU's
Property Type7
1. Rooming House (Same as a 6 unit apartment)
10
GROUP G
Ratine Breakdown:
High intensity lighting 1
High people use 3
High security benefit 1
Total 5 EDU's
Property Type:
1. Restaurant
2. Theaters
GROUP H
Ratine Breakdown:
Moderate intensity lighting 1/2
Nominal people use 1
High security benefit 1
Total 2-1/2 EDU's
Property Tvne•
Doubled due to average size of business 5 units
1. Light manufacturing
2. Food Processing Plant
3. Warehousing
GROUP
Ratine Breakdown:
High intensity lighting 1
Nominal people use 1
High security benefit 1
Total 3 EDU's
Property Type•
Doubled due to average size of business 6 units
1. Auto, recreational equipment sales and service
GROUP J
Rating Breakdown:
High intensity lighting 1
Moderate people use 2
High security benefit 1
Total 4 EDU's
11
Property Type:
Doubled due to average size of business 8 EDU's
1. Markets
2. Bowling Alleys
3. Skating Rinks
4. Department Stores
5. Hotels and Motels
6. Mobile home parks
GROUP K
Properties within the 10 land use categories in this group varied widely from the norm and
therefore these lots or parcels were considered on an individual basis. Each of the parcels
or lots in these land use categories was identified on the official lighting district maps and
each streetlight or portion thereof in the immediate proximity of the lots or parcels
benefiting the lots or parcels was assigned a number of units as identified below. The total
number of EDU's so determined for that category would be distributed among the lots or
parcels in that category in proportion to the lot or parcel area as shown below. A minimum
of three EDU's would be assessed to each lot or parcel to be compatible with group D which
contains many of the smaller business categories. Several large lots or parcels in outlying
areas within the existing lighting district have no lights in the immediate proximity and
therefore those lots or parcels would be assessed the minimum amount.
K-1
K-2
BAtina Breakdown:
Moderate intensity lighting
Moderate people use
Moderate security benefit
Total
Property Type:
1. Open Storage
2. Mineral Processing
Rating Breakdown:
Moderate intensity lighting
High people use
Moderate security benefit
Total
Property Type:
I. Colleges/Universities (private)
2. Wholesale and manufacturing (outlets)
3. Athletic and amusement facilities
4. Heavy manufacturing
5. Hospitals
12
1-U4
1
5-U4 EDU's
0.014973 units per 100 sq. Feet
0.005615 units per 100 sq. Feet
1-L4
4
1
6-U4 EDU's
0.001736 units per 100 sq. Feet
0.059858 units per 100 sq. Feet
0.027431 units per 100 sq. Feet
0.006382 units per 100 sq. Feet
0.012886 units per 100 sq. Feet
K-3
Rating Breakdown:
High intensity lighting
High people use
Moderate security benefit
Total
Property Type:
1. Motion Picture, radio, T.V.
2. Neighborhood Shopping Centers
3. Regional shopping centers
1-U2
4
1
6-U2 EDU's
0.010938 units per 100 sq. Feet
0.014449 units per 100 sq. Feet
0.021812 units per 100 sq. Feet
Since the benefits have been related to property use and property users, no charge would
be assessed on vacant lots or parcels within the district.
VII. CERTIFICATIONS
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
Preliminary approval by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita on the _ day of
, 2000.
Sharon L. Dawson, City Clerk
City of Santa Clarita
FINAL APPROVAL
Final approval by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita on the _ day of
, 2000.
Sharon L. Dawson, City Clerk
City of Santa Clarita
I, , as City Clerk, do hereby certify that the foregoing assessments, together
with the boundary maps attached thereto, were filed in my office on the _ day of
, 2000.
Sharon L. Dawson, City Clerk
City of Santa Clarita
13
I, , as City Clerk, do hereby certify that the foregoing assessments, together
with the boundary maps attached thereto, were approved and confirmed by the City
Council of the City of Santa Clarita on the _ day of , 2000.
Sharon L. Dawson, City Clerk
City of Santa Clarita
I, , City Engineer of the City of Santa Clarita do hereby certify that
the foregoing assessments, together with the boundary maps attached thereto, were
recorded in my office on the day of 2000.
Anthony J. Nisich, City Engineer
City of Santa Clarita
State of California
I, Richard L. Kopecky, Willdan, Engineer of Work for the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby
certify that the foregoing assessments, together with the boundary maps attached thereto,
are true and correct.
Submitted by:
Richard L. Kopecky, RCE 16742
Assessment Engineer
14
Richard L. Kopecky, RCE 16742
Engineer of Work
"APPENDIX A"
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
15
"APPENDIX B"
ASSESSMENT ROLL
ANNEXATION NO. 2000-L9 INTO
STREETLIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
Tract No. 51931-01 and -02
The assessment roll for the annexation to the Streetlight Maintenance District is hereby
incorporated and made a part of this report. The Assessment Rolls are on file at the City
where they are available for public inspection.
Reference is made to the Los Angeles County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots
or parcels in each of the Assessment Districts.
Parcel No.
33
Proposed
Land Use
Non -Res
Current APN
Portion 2811001059
Assmt per
EDU
$50
Proposed
EDU's
1
Total
Assessment
$50
14
Non -Res
Portion 2811001123
$50
4
$200
20
Non -Res
Portion 2811001123
$50
4
$200
21
Non -Res
Portion 2811001123
$50
4
$200
24
Non -Res
Portion 2811001123
$50
4
200
30
Non -Res
Portion 2811001123
$50
4
200
37
Non -Res
Portion 2811001123
$50
4
200
42
Non -Res
Portion 2811002002
$50
4
200
57
SFR
Portion 2811001119
$50
130EI$4,150
6,500
29
SFR
Portion 2811001119
$50
83
31
SFR
Portion 2811001119
$50
76
$3,800
67
SFR
Portion 2811001121
$50
60
$3,000
68
SFR
Portion 2811001121
$50
18
$900
56
SFR
Portion 2811001121, 059
$50
44
$2,200
82
SFR
Portion 2811001121, 059
$50
35
$1.750
70
SFR
Portion 2811001121
$50
42
$2,100
71
SFR
Portion 2811001121,059
$50
43
$2,150
72
SFR
Portion 2811001059
$50
6
$300
73
SFR
Portion 2811001059
$50
8
$400
74
SFR
Portion 2811001059
$50
32
$1,600
75
SFR
Portion 2811001059
$50
25
$1,250
76
SFR
Portion 2811001059
$50
16
$800
35
SFR
Portion 2811001123
$50
60
$3,000
16
SFR
Portion 2811001123
$50
128
$6,400
17
SFR
Portion 2811002044, 049,
$50
64.58
$3,229
2811001119,2866007042
18
SFR
Portion 2811002044, 049,
$50
64.58
$3,229
16
Current Los Angeles County Assessor records indicate that there are fourteen (14) existing
parcels within the annexation boundaries. These 14 parcels will be combined and re -
subdivided into the 31 parcels shown above. When these parcels further subdivide they
will be given the individual assessments of $50 per EDU.
eng-eWbd\pey\lighting\LBeng p.d.
17
2811001119
19
SFR
Portion 2811002044, 049
$50
64.58
Non-Res
Portion 2866018141,
$50
5
2866007032
=$200
Non -Res
Portion 2811001119
$50
4
Non -Res
Portion 2811001123
$50
4
Non -Res
Portion 2811002044
$50
4
$200
Current Los Angeles County Assessor records indicate that there are fourteen (14) existing
parcels within the annexation boundaries. These 14 parcels will be combined and re -
subdivided into the 31 parcels shown above. When these parcels further subdivide they
will be given the individual assessments of $50 per EDU.
eng-eWbd\pey\lighting\LBeng p.d.
17