Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-11-27 - RESOLUTIONS - FLYING TIGER DR ZONE CHANGE (2)RESOLUTION NO. 01-157 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR MASTER CASE 01-047, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 01-002, ZONE CHANGE 01-001, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 01-003, AND VARIANCE 01-002 LOCATED EASTERLY OF SIERRA HIGHWAY AT THE TERMINUS OF THE PROPOSED FLYING TIGER DRIVE (LOT 4 OF PARCEL MAP 25916) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: FINDINGS OF FACT. The City Council does hereby make the following findings of fact: a. On February 6, 2001, an entitlement application was filed with the Planning & Building Services Department which included the following requests: an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element Land Use Map to redesignate approximately 5.84 acres of Community Commercial (CC)land use to Residential High (RH) land use; a zone change modifying the Unified Development Code Zoning designation and standards of approximately 5.84 acres of property from Community Commercial (CC) to Residential High (RH) zoning designation; a conditional use permit to allow for the construction of a storybuildimCeideeding 35 feet-in—height; and a variance to waive the Unified Development Code requirement to provide 250 cubic feet of lockable, enclosed storage space per unit; and b. On February 14, 2001, the application was deemed to be complete and consistent with the Submittal Requirements of the City of Santa Clarita; and C. On November 6, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Clarita conducted a duly noticed public hearing for the proposed 200 unit affordable senior housing project. The public hearing was held at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita; and d. The Planning Commission fully considered the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study prepared for Master Case 01-047; and e. The Planning Commission fully considered all testimony and evidence regarding the proposed 200 unit affordable senior housing project consisting of General Plan Amendment 01-002, Zone Change 01-001, Conditional Use Permit 01-003, Variance 01-002 (Master Case 01-047). f. On November 27, 2001, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita conducted a duly noticed public hearing for the proposed 200 unit affordable senior housing project. The public hearing was held at 6:00 p.m, at City Hall, Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita; and City Council Resolution Master Case al -047 Page 2 of 10 g. The City Council fully considered the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study prepared for Master Case 01-047; and h. The City Council fully considered all testimony and evidence regarding the proposed 200 unit affordable senior housing project consisting of General Plan Amendment 01-002, Zone Change 01-001, Conditional Use Permit 01-003, Variance 01-002 (Master Case 01-047). CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS. Based upon the testimony and other evidence received at the hearing, and upon the study and investigation made the City Council further finds as follows: a. A Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study for this project have been prepared and circulated in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and adopted as required by that Act; and b. Said study found that no adverse impact to the existing and future environmental resources of the area would result from the proposal; and C. A Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study have been circulated for review and comment by affected governmental agencies and the public, and —for all comments received have been considered. The public review period was from October 7, 2001 through November 6, 2001; and d. The proposed project would not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study were posted and advertised on October 7, 2001; and e. The Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement of the City of Santa Clarita; and f. The City Council, based upon the findings set forth above, hereby finds that the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project has been prepared in compliance with CEQA. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FINDINGS. In making the recommendation contained in this resolution, the City Council has considered the General Plan Amendment and finds and determines as follows: a. That the proposed general plan amendment from Community Commercial (CC) to Residential High (RH) is consistent with the following goals and policies of the City's General Plan: Housing Goal 1: To provide, opportunities for the production of a range of new housing in the planning area to meet the needs of all income groups. Vis,. , •vrt!,�..arn ��t:.,.�.;::•..;k; City Council Resolution Master Case 01-047 Page 3of10 Housing Policy 1.1: Implement the land use plan which provides opportunities for the development of a wide variety of new housing types within the City. Housing Policy 2.2: Locate higher density residential development and housing for the elderly in close proximity to public transportation and commercial land uses, and in close proximity to public services and recreational opportunities, and/or target the future provision of such services to accommodate existing or new housing for the elderly. Housing Goal 3: To provide sites suitable for a variety of housing types for all income levels and assist in the development and provision of affordable and proportionally priced and sized homes to meet the needs of all community residents, including low and moderate income, large families, handicapped, families with female heads of households, farm workers, and the elderly. Housing Policy 3.1: Implement the City General Plan land use element which provides opportunities for a range of housing densities and types. Housing Policy 3.7: Provide opportunities for the development of adequate housing to provide the City's fair share of low and moderate income households. -------------Housing Policy 3.8: Encourage and participate in low and moderate income and - senior citizen housing programs financed by other levels of government: Housing Policy 3.9: Promote the dispersal of low and moderate income housing throughout the Santa Clarita planning area. Housing Policy 3.11: Consider alternative development standards that are practical in light of environmental, market, infrastructure and other factors to promote desired housing types and benefits, while also protecting the quality of life in the City. Housing Goal 3: To provide sites suitable for a variety of housing types for all income levels and assist in the development and provision of affordable and proportionally priced and sized homes to meet the needs of all community residents, including low and moderate income, large families, handicapped, families with female heads of households, farm workers, and the elderly. Housing Policy 3.1: Implement the City General Plan land use element which provide opportunities for a range of housing densities and types. Housing Goal 4: To maintain and improve the condition of the existing housing stock, particularly the affordable portion of the housing stock, where feasible. Housing Policy 4.2: Promote the maintenance of existing affordable housing City Council Resolution Master Case 01.047 Page 4 of 10 throughout the City, including dwellings occupied by households utilizing Section 8 programs and other governmental and/or non-profit housing assistance programs. Housing Policy 5.1: Promote reasonable processing time and fees, including consideration of adjustment or waiver of fees to facilitate non-profit affordable housing and other special needs projects. Housing Policy 5.5: Encourage the enactment of Federal and State legislation to provide funding for the maintenance and development of affordable housing. Housing Policy 5.6 allow density bonuses, or other incentives of equivalent financial value, as required by State law, when a new housing development includes an appropriate number of affordable units. The proposed 200 unit affordable senior housing project is consistent with several goals and program policies of the general plan which are listed above. The proposed project will provide opportunities to seniors in the Santa Clarita Valley to live within the community of Canyon Country in affordable apartments with on-site amenities. The income levels of potential residents will be restricted to low-income seniors, which is encouraged by the Housing Element. In addition, the applicant is requesting a density bonus in order to provide affordability _-- through the proposed density. -The proposed project is also located just easterly— of -- of Sierra Highway which provides public transportation and other amenities and the applicant will be providing a shuttle service for the residents. Therefore, the project is consistent with several of the General Plan Housing Element goals and policies. ZONE CHANGE FINDINGS. In making the recommendation contained in this resolution, the City Council has considered certain principals and standards, and finds (Section 17.03.020 of the Unified Development Code) and determines as follows: a. That because of the lack of high density residentially zoned property and a need for more affordable senior housing in the City of Santa Clarita, there is a need for the Zone Change to Residential High (RH) zoning for the area just easterly of Sierra Highway at the terminus of Flying Tiger Drive for lots 4 and 5 of Tentative Parcel Map 25916 which is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, Development Code, and development policies of the City of Santa Clarita. b. The public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good planning practice justifies the Zone Change classification to Residential High (RH) based upon the fact that the zone change would provide affordable senior housing to the Canyon Country Community within the City of Santa Clarita. The Zone Change would be compatible with the existing and future adjacent residential and commercial uses -.with application of the Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Measures. City Council Resolution Master Case 01-047 Page 5of10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS. In making the recommendation contained in this resolution, the City Council has considered the proposed 200 unit affordable senior housing project which will exceed 35 feet in height requiring approval of a Conditional Use Permit and fords and determines as follows: a. That the proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use in accordance with the purpose of this Development Code, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located, the Santa Clarita General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the City. The proposed 200 unit affordable senior housing project is located near uses that are consistent with and complementary to the project. The proposed 200 units on the 5.84 acre site, with a density bonus, are supported by the density bonus provisions as identified in the Unified Development Code. The density bonus provisions also support the requested increase in building height for this type of use. The City's Design Guidelines have been applied to the proposed project with regard to site planning, parking lot design, landscaping, and building far de. In addition, the City's Design Consultant has reviewed the proposed project and the applicant has made modifications consistent with the Design Consultants suggested changes. The operating characteristics of the proposed project will be consistent with and complementary to the surrounding uses. The operation of a 200 unit affordable senior housing project will not create a public nuisance to the surrounding community. The proposed project is consistent with the purpose of the Development Code and the purpose of the requested zoning designation. In addition, the proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan, and . the development policies and standards of the City. b. That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with and will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures, or natural resources, with consideration given to: 1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density. The proposed 200 unit affordable senior housing project is designed to be consistent with the surrounding multi -family neighborhoods located to the east of the project site. The proposed project is compatible with the harmony, scale, bulk, coverage, and density of the surrounding uses or resources. 2. Availability of public facilities, services and utilities. The proposed project would create an additional demand for utilities. The project presents the need for new systems and supplies, however only minor alterations to the following utilities are necessary: power and City Council Resolution Master Case 01-047 Page 6 of 10 natural gas; communication systems; local and regional water treatment and distribution facilities; sanitary sewer; storm water drainage; solid waste disposal; and local and regional water supplies. The project site is located on the proposed Flying Tiger Drive which is adjacent to Sierra Highway and near the intersection of Via Princessa and the State Route 14 on/off ramp. Sierra Highway is classified as a major highway and there are many public services that are accessible from the surrounding roads. Therefore, public facilities, services and utilities will be available to the proposed project. 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character. The proposed project is located in the Flying Tiger subdivision, which is currently vacant. The surrounding multi -family residential neighborhood to the east are of a compatible density and height as the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed project will not have a harmful effect upon the existing desirable neighborhood character. 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets. The proposed project will add an estimated 150 vehicle trips per day to the site The site is located in an area that has already been improved with respect to circulation and therefore can accommodate the proposed use. The site would be located on the proposed Flying Tiger Drive, which will be accessed from Sierra Highway. In addition, the proposed project will provide a tram service for the senior tenants of the facility, which will help to reduce the total number of vehicle trips. Therefore, generation of traffic will be supported adequately by the capacity and physical character of the surrounding streets. 5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed. The proposed project is located on lot 4 of the Flying Tiger subdivision. Lot 4 are located to the rear of the subdivision near the multi -family residential community located to the east of the project site. In addition, a day care center has been proposed on lot 3 of the project site, an existing storagelvehicle rental facility is located just west of the proposed site, and the rear of the State Route 14 off ramp is located to the south- west. Therefore, the proposed intensity of the project will be consistent with the surrounding land uses. 6. The harmful effect, if any,, upon environmental quality and natural resources. '.q; ytn;t,•,a, °a¢�q,lgrlx�'Psiil r,9a"�L.�, _ City Council Resolution Master Case 01-047 Page 7 of 10 The proposed project is located on a site that is relatively flat. There are no oak trees located on the project site and there are not any natural resources that will be harmed as a result of the proposed project. An initial study has been prepared by staff to analyze any potential impacts that may be caused as a result of the project. Staff concluded that there would be no significant impacts with the implementation of mitigation measures which are listed in the described in the initial study. Therefore, the proposed project will not have any harmful effect upon the environmental quality and natural resources on the project site. C. That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed 200 unit affordable senior housing project will provide residential housing opportunities for low income seniors as required by the Housing Element of the General Plan, the Housing Allocation for the City of Santa Clarita as set forth by SCAG (Southern California Association of Governments) in the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) and the City's Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) component of the City's Consolidated Plan prepared for the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The proposed 200 unit affordable senior housing -project - - will not create a nuisance in the surrounding multi -family residential neighborhood. The operating characteristics of the proposed project will be complementary to the surrounding uses. Therefore, the proposed project is providing the residents of the valley with a use that is necessary and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. d. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provision of this code, except for an approved variance or adjustment. The proposed 200 unit affordable senior housing project will comply with all the provision specified in Section 17.15, of the Unified Development Code with regard to multi -family residential uses. However, the applicant is requesting approval of a variance in order to waive the requirement to provide 250 cubic feet of lockable, enclosed storage space per unit requiring approval of a variance. Therefore, the proposed project will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this code, with the exception of an approved variance request. VARIANCE FINDINGS. In making the recommendation contained in this resolution, the City Council has considered the applicant's variance request to waive the requirement to provide 250 cubic feet of lockable, enclosed storage space per unit and finds and determines as follows: City Council Resolution Master Case 01-047 Page 8 of 10 a. That, because of special circumstances applicable to the property, (size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings) or the intended use of the property, the strict application of the Development Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties. The Unified Development Code requires that multi -family residences provide 250 cubic feet of lockable, enclosed storage space per unit. The lockable, enclosed storage space is generally attached to the carports provided on-site. Due to the nature of the proposed multi -family project, the intended residents of the proposed project does not cause a need for the applicant to provide 250 cubic feet of lockable, enclosed storage space. Strict application of the Unified Development Code would deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other affordable senior projects that did not meet this requirement. b. That granting a variance or adjustment is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone and denied to the property for which the variance or adjustment is sought. The applicant's request to waive the requirement to provide 250 cubic feet of lockable, enclosed storage space is necessary in order for the subject property to provide affordable senior housing in this community. Other properties with a similar use have not provided the -enclosed 250 cubic feet of lockable; enclosed storage space because it was not necessary based on the needs of the prospective tenants. C. That granting of this variance or adjustment will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone which the property is located. The applicant's request is consistent with other senior housing facilities that have not been required to provide this provision. The granting of a variance to waive the multi -family residential requirement to provide 250 cubic feet of lockable, enclosed storage space will not create a material detriment to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone which the property is located. d. That granting of this variance does not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is situated. The requesttowaive the requirement to provide 250 cubic feet of lockable, enclosed storage space has not been provided in other similar projects in the — City. In addition, the nature of the proposed project does not necessitate for this provision to be met. The granting of this variance does not constitute a special privilege that is inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the N, `,l Y di '� �: •u r 1 0 City Council Resolution Master Case 01-047 Page 9 of 10 vicinity and zone. e. That granting of this variance does not allow a use or activity that is prohibited by the zoning regulation governing the parcel of property. The variance request to waive a multi family residential requirement is not allowing a use or activity that is prohibited by the zoning regulation governing the parcel or property. It is common for similar uses to request the waiver of this requirement. f. That granting the variance or adjustment will not be inconsistent with the City of Santa Clarita General Plan. The granting of the applicant's variance request to waive the requirement to provide 250 cubic feet of lockable, enclosed storage space will not be inconsistent with the City of Santa Clarita General Plan. APPROVAL. The City Council of the City of Santa Clarita approves the following: a. The Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for this project per the California Environmental Quality Act, as reference herein; and —� — b ------ . Thero osed 200 unit affordable senior housin p p g project (Master Case 01-047,--------- General 1-047; _----General Plan Amendment 01-002, Zone Change 01-001, Conditional Use Permit O1-003, and Variance 01-002) with Conditions of Approval as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. City Council Resolution Master Case -01-047 Page 10 of 20 PASSED AND APPROVED this 27" day of NovemS4 ATTEST:— CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) 2001. iB I, Sharon L. Dawson, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was regularly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 27" day of November 2001 by the following vote, to wit: ---AYES:- COUNCILMEMBERS: Smyth,- Darcy; Kellar, Ferry, G NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None .)/� 0-� � - CITY CLERK e:pbs\current\2001\01-047\resosenior ITA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MASTER CASE 01-047 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 01-002 ZONE CHANGE 01-001 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 01-003 VARIANCE 01-002 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL/MITIGATION MEASURES General Conditions GC1. Unless appropriate permits and entitlements are activated, the approval of this project and associated entitlements shall expire two years from the date of conditional approval. GC2. The applicant may file for an extension of the approval prior to the date of expiration for a period of time not to exceed one year. If such an extension is requested, it must be filed no later than 60 days prior to expiration. GC3. The applicant shall be responsible for notifying the Director of Planning and Building Services in writing of any change in ownership, designation of a new engineer, or change in the status of the developer, within 30 days of said change. GC4. Unless otherwise apparent from the context, the term Applicant shall include the applicant and any other persons, corporation, or other entity making use of this grant. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Santa Clarita, its _ agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City _ or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Subdivision by the City, which action is provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the City becomes aware of any such claim, action, or proceeding, the City shall promptly notify the applicant, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. Nothing contained in this Condition prohibits the City from participating in the defense of any claim, action, or proceeding, if both the following occur: 1) The City bears its own attorney's fees and costs; and, 2) the City defends the action in good faith. The applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless the entitlement is approved by the applicant. GC5. Details shown on this approval are not necessarily approved. Any details which are inconsistent with the requirements of ordinances, general conditions of approval, or City policies must be specifically approved. GC6. At any point in the development process, a stop -work order shall be considered in effect upon the discovery of any historic or prehistoric artifacts and/or remains, at which time the City shall be notified. The applicant shall hire a qualified consultant that the City approves to study the site and recommend a course of action, to the satisfaction of the City. GC7. In lieu of establishing the final specific locations of structures on each lot at this time, the owner, at the time of issuance of building permits, agrees to develop the property in conformance with the City Code and other appropriate ordinances, including but not Resolution P01-43 MC 01-047— Conditions -of Approval: Page" 2 of 8 limited to the Building Code, Plumbing Coded Grading Ordinance, Highway Permit Ordinance, Mechanical Code, Zoning Ordinance, Oak Tree Ordinance, Undergrounding of Utilities Ordinance, Sanitary Sewer and Industrial Waste Ordinance, Electrical Code, and Fire Code. Improvements and other requirements may be imposed pursuant to such codes and ordinances in accordance with vested rights as provided for in the Government Code. GC8. A grading permit shall be required for any and all grading to occur for the purpose of this project. GC9. This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the permittee and the owner of the property involved (if other than the permittee) have filed with the Director of Planning and Building Services, their affidavit stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. GC10. All conditions for PM 25916 shall be met prior to approval of the 200 unit affordable senior housing project. GC11. The 200 unit apartment project shall remain affordable restricted to low income, senior tenants and a deed must be recorded for at least thirty (30) years. Planning Division _.-- --- --- -- --- PL Utility services of electrical, water, gas, security alarm and monitoring systems shall be routed underground. Utility equipment, such as transformers, meters, regulators, installed above ground shall be screened from view. P2. Any changes to the approved project including building design, color, or material change shall be approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning & Building Services. P3. 10 percent of the project site shall be landscaped, with five percent in the parking areas. The landscaped setback areas and parking lot trees may count toward this requirement. P4. No signage is to be reviewed or approved at this time. The applicant shall obtain Planning Division approval for any signage proposed for the project prior to its placement on the buildings/property. P5. Outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. Highly reflective surfaces conducive to glare are not permitted. P6. The project shall comply with all applicable City of Santa Clarita noise regulations during the construction period. P7. Construction hours will be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and between 8:00 a.m. and 6.00 p.m. on weekends, unless, traffic volumes or public safety issues ;warrant otherwise (as determined by City, County or Resolution POI -43 MC 01-047— Conditions of Approval Page 3 of 8 7 I.Siate officials). No construction on Sundays and legally proclaimed holidays will occur. P8. Where noise impacts from construction activities prove to unduly interfere with operations of businesses, the applicant will erect temporary noise barriers where they do not restrict access to residences or businesses and where they do not affect visibility of businesses. P9. All roof equipment, backflow devices, utilities and trash receptacles shall be adequately screened from view. P10. All plant material shall be irrigated by automatic sprinklers or drip irrigation systems. Patios, seating areas, parking and circulation spaces can be included in the setback areas to help buffer adjoining parcels from one another. However, parking areas shall not be permitted within the required front setback. P11. A masonryAvrought iron wall, six (6) feet in height from the highest finished grade, shall be required on the rear and side property lines and installed to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning & Building Services. P12. A minimum of two hundred (200) square feet of open area per ground floor unit shall be provided and a minimum of one hundred fifty (150) square feet fo open space for units contained wholly on the second story or above shall be provided. Land required for - setbacks or occupied by buildings, streets, driveways, or parking spaces may notbe - - -- counted in satisfying this open space requirement; however, land occupied by any recreational buildings and structures may be counted as required open space. P13. Recreation vehicle parking areas shall be provided, fully screened from public view, or the development shall prohibit all parking of recreation vehicles. P14. Trash areas shall be provided for each residential building. All trash areas not located inside a building shall be paved and located in the rear yard. Such area shall have minimum inside dimensions of eight (8) feet by five (5) feet, shall accommodate source seperation of recyclable materials in accordance with State requirements, and shall be screened from view by a five (5) foot high masonry wall and solid gates. One trash area shall be provided for the first ten (10) residential units, and one (1) trash area for each additional ten (10) units, or major fraction thereof P15. A minimum of fifty (50) trees per gross acre shall be required as part of the landscaping requirements: twenty (20) percent shall be twenty-four (24) inch box size or larger, seventy (70) shall be fifteen (15) gallon size and ten (10) shall be five (5) gallon size. Drought tolerant species with low maintenance requirements shall be utilized, where possible. Irrigation shall be on automatic systems. Landscaping and irrigation plans shall be prepared by a California licensed landscape architect. P16. The applicant shall provide landscaping to reduce the amount of sunlight that will directly hit the windows. Resolution P01-43 MC 01-047'— Conditions of Approval Page 4 -of 8 P17. The applicant shall utilize low glare glass on the windows of the proposed affordable senior housing project to reduce excessive light and glare. P18. All parking lot lighting and exterior lighting shall be directed downward and boxed. Building and Safetv Bl. All structures shall comply with the detailed requirements of the following: A. The 1997 Uniform Building Code B. The 1998 California Building Code Amendments C. The 1999 City of Santa Clarita amendments to the building codes A copy of the City amendments is available at the Building & Safety counter B2. A complete soils and geology report will be required for the project. Three sets of the report shall be formally submitted to the engineering Division for review and approval. One copy of the report shall be submitted to Building & Safety for review at the time of plan submittal for building permits. B3. Prior to the issuance of building permits: C. Rough ­grading and/or recompaction (if proposed) must be completed__„___ ___ A final compaction report and Rough Grading Certification shall be submitted to and approved by the Engineering Division. A copy of the final compaction report shall be reviewed by Building & Safety B4. All structures shall be setback from any ascending and descending slopes per section 1806.5. B5. The project shall fully comply with the disabled access requirements per the California Building Code. B6. Reminder regarding fire sprinklers: a residential sprinkler system (NFPA-13R) may not be used to increase allowable building areas or increase number of stories. B7. Additional clearances, from agencies not present at DRC, prior to the issuance of building permits will be required from: A. William S. Hart School District and appropriate elementary school district B. Castaic Lake Water Agency C. L.A. County Sanitation District An agency referral list is available at the Building & Safety public counter. B8: A fee for a Final Planning Field Approval inspection and Fire District fees will be required at the time of issuance of any building permits. Resolution POI -43 MC 01-047—Conditions of Approval Page 5 of 8 B9. At the time of application for a building permit, please submit two complete sets of construction documents (including structural and energy calculations, soil report, truss drawings and calcs, etc.). Engineering Services Department GENERAL ES1. The owner, at the time of issuance of permits or other grants of approval agrees to develop the property in accordance with City codes and other appropriate ordinances such as the Building Code, Plumbing Code, Grading Code, Highway Permit Ordinance, Mechanical Code, Zoning Ordinance, Undergrounding of Utilities Ordinance, Sanitary Sewer and Industrial Waste Ordinance, Electrical Code, and Fire Code. ES2. The Parcel Map 25916 shall be recorded and conditions of the map shall be met including all required street improvements prior to the occupancy of this project. ES3. The applicant shall repair any broken or damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk, and refurbish the half section of pavement on streets within or abutting this project, prior to building occupancy. GRADING, DRAINAGE & GEOLOGY ES4. The applicant shall submit a grading plan consistent with the approval for the entire site, which must be approved prior to the issuance of the grading permit. ES5. The applicant's grading plan shall be based on a detailed engineering geotechnical report which must be specifically approved by the geologist and/or soils engineer and show all recommendations submitted by them. It must also agree with the site plan and conditions as approved by the Advisory Agency. ES6. The applicant shall eliminate all geologic hazards associated with this proposed development, or delineate restricted use areas approved by the consultant geologist to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of the grading permit. EST The applicant shall submit drainage plans and necessary support documents to comply with Engineering requirements. These must be approved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the grading permit. ES8. The applicant shall provide for the proper distribution of drainage. ES9. Specific drainage requirements for the site will be established at building permit application. Resolution P01-43 MC 01-047— Conditions of Approval Page 6 of 8 ES10. Driveways -shall be -constructed using the City of Santa Clarita alley intersection design No. 110-1 Type (M.. Applicant shall obtain approval from the City Engineer for the location of all driveways. ES11. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay the applicable Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District Fee to implement the highway element of the General Plan as a means of mitigating the traffic impact of this subdivision. ES12. The applicant may construct off-site improvements of equivalent value in lieu of paying fees established for the District subject to approval of the City Engineer. The B&T fee shall be paid first at the time stated above and will be reimbursed upon completion and acceptance of such off-site improvments. Factors for development units are as follows: Development Units Factors Apartment Per Unit 0.7 The project is in the: PQ Eastside Bridge and Thoroughfare District B&T fee is subject to change. The fee rate is based on the rate at the time of payment. ES13. Applicant shall provide an irrevocable offer of dedication for reciprocal access rights for the driveway along the north and west side of the property, to provide shared access at the project driveways. ES14. Applicant shall acquire N.P.D.E.S. permits if applicable. ES15. All construction plans and activities must be in compliance with the provisions of the stormwater permit and associated SUSMP, including all applicable BMP's, both permanent and construction -related. The permanent BMP's shall be in place prior to acceptance of the associated improvements. Construction -related BMP's shall be on the SUSMP plan and shall be in place during all phases of the construction. TRAFFIC ES16. Flying Tiger parkway shall be built to City of Santa Clarita standards prior to occupancy. ES17. The existing traffic signal at Flying Tiger/Sierra Highway: shall be modified and made operational prior to occupancy per City of Santa Clarita Traffic Engineering approval. -- ES18. The applicant, shall provide an exclusive right turn land to be constructed in the north bound'direction to serve the site prior to occupancy (at the #2 intersection). Resolution POI -43 MC 01-047—Conditions of Approval Page 7 of 8 Parks and Recreation PR1. Provide final landscape and irrigation plans for review and approval of the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Where no grading permit is required the landscapelirrigation plans will be required prior to issuance of building permit. PR2. Prior to the recordation of an applicable final tract/parcel map, a special landscape maintenance district may/shall be formed having the responsibility and authority of all maintenance, including, but not limited to, landscaping, irrigation, street trees, and medians within the City right-of-way. The Landscape Maintenance District shall be annexed into a City Landscape District to the satisfaction of the Director of Parks, Recreation, and Community Services. PR3. Trees planted within 14 feet of the paved road section in commercial developments on major arterials will be subject to the Parkway Influence Area, as identified in City Ordinance 91-45. Trees planted within this area will be maintained by the property owner. PR4. Street trees shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Director of Parks, Recreation, and Community Services. The irrigation and maintenance of these trees shall be per City Ordinance 90-15, which established rules and regulations relating to the maintenance removal_ of trees, and other plantings in public areas, right-of-ways, easements, and on private property. PR5. Prior to the recordation of an applicable final tract/parcel map, the applicant is required to pay fees that fulfill their Parkland Dedication requirements as identified in the Subdivision Ordinance (17.17.060). PR6. See additional comments on Conceptual Landscape Plan. Fire Department FD1. Public and private hydrants will be required when existing locations have been identified. FD2. Fire Department access width shall be a minimum of 28 feet wide to within 150 feet of all portions of buildings. Said access shall provide minimum turning radii of 42 feet on all turns associated with the required access. The centerline of the access roadway shall be located parallel to and within 30 feet of the exterior wall on at least one side of the buildings. FD3. The buildings should be fully fire-spriklered. Resolution P01-43 MC 01-047 — Conditions of Approval Page 8 of 8 'environmental Services- ESI. Because the proposed project site is greater than 5 acres, it is subject to a General Construction Permit under the City's Municipal'Stormwater Permit. The applicant should send an NOI to the City showing the permit application has been filed and a State SWPPP prepared. ES2. Sediments from areas disturbed by construction shall be retained on site, using structural drainage controls to the maximum extent practicable, and stockpiles of soil shall be properly contained to minimize sediment transport from the site to streets, drainage facilities or adjacent properties via runoff, vehicle tracking, or wind. ES3. Construction -related materials, wastes, spills or residues shall be retained on site to minimize transport from the site to streets, drainage facilities or adjoining properties by wind or runoff. ES4. Runoff from equipment and vehicle washing shall be contained at construction sites unless treated to remove sediments and pollutants. ESS. There must be a total of eighteen 3 -yard trash bins. Bins should be arranged in solid waste enclosures large enoughto house either two or four bins. Half of the bins in each _ enclosure should be reserved for recycling. ALL TRASH ENCLOSURES SHOULD BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. ES6. All trash enclosures should be consistent with the surrounding architecture and be located to provide convenient pedestrian and collection vehicle access. EST All trash enclosures should be consistent with current City specifications and have a solid roof. ESB. The project proponent is encouraged to.recycle construction and demolition debris. Contact the Environmental Services Division for debris recycling information TRANSIT Tl.. Sidewalks shall be provided on Flying Tiger Drive in order to provide pedestrian access on Sierra Highway. T3. Applicant should designate a Dial -A -Ride pick-uptdrop-off area. T4. Project is subject to transit impact fees. Currently, fee is $200 per residential unit. However, applicant is advised that the fee is under revision. Applicant is subject to the _ fee in place at the time of building permit issuance. 0pbe\current\2001\01.047\conditions