The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2002-03-26 - AGENDA REPORTS - EASTSIDE B&TDIST FEE AMEND (2)CITY OF SANTA CLARITA AGENDA REPORT PUBLIC HEARING DATE: March 26, 2002 City Manager Approval: Item to be presented by: SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE EASTSIDE BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT DEPARTMENT: Transportation & Engineering Services RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. City Council conduct a public hearing. 2. At the conclusion of the public hearing, providing there is less than 50 percent written protest from the represented area of benefit: a. Adopt a resolution amending the adopted Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District. b. Instruct the City Clerk to record a certified copy of the adopted resolution with the County Recorder. BACKGROUND This item is a public hearing to consider amendments to the adopted Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District (District). The proposed amendments are necessary to update the District to a full -improvement district. As a full -improvement district, $236,938,130 will be collected to construct all of the highway system improvements identified in the Circulation Elements of the City and County General Plans. Improvements funded through the District include, but are not limited to, new and improved roadways, bridges, intersections, and interchanges. Updating the District will provide an equitable financing mechanism by which new development within an identified area will share the costs of providing full -mitigation transportation improvements. This type of funding district levies an assessment in proportion to the estimated number of vehicle trips generated by the new development. Based on transportation needs in the Santa Clarita Valley, and the limitations of other funding sources, this funding method has been determined to be the best alternative to provide needed transportation -related improvements. Because several of the improvements included in the District are regionally significant, the District's fee calculation assumes that the City and County will pursue grant funding for eligible regional improvements. Agenda Item :vv .Ate. - (/ . ...p1.4, 4V AMENDMENT TO THE EASTSIDE BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT March 26, 2002 — Page 2 The County of Los Angeles originally adopted the District in July 1987 as the Route 126 Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District. After incorporation, the City adopted the District on November 28, 1989. In January 1993, under the City of Santa Clarita's Resolution No. 93-4, the District was renamed to the Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District. The current fee of $10,000 per Factored Development Unit (FDU) was approved by the City Council on September 14, 1999. This District update is different from previous fee revisions where the fee had been revised due to changes in improvement costs and in the amount of proposed future development. This update reanalyzes "build -out" development of the District and expands on the scope of needed improvements. Instead of including only a very limited number of improvement projects, the updated District proposes to fully improve all major roadways identified in the City and County Circulation Elements, including intersections and interchanges. These necessary transportation improvements within the District cost an estimated $236,938,130. A development analysis indicates that an estimated 12,598 residential units, 487 commercial land use acres, and 157 industrial land use acres are expected to be built within the District's boundary. The City's Transportation & Engineering Services staff has worked with the consultant team and several major developers within the proposed Eastside District to develop the technical data for the proposed fee amendments. In October 2001, staff prepared a public participation plan to update the District. The City Council approved the plan and directed staff to form a B&T Update Technical Subcommittee comprised of representatives from the Santa Clarita Valley's development community. The Technical Subcommittee met five times over the last six months. Based on input from the committee, the data and funding assumptions supporting the fee were refined and revised. Two public workshops were also held in February 2002 to present the proposed fee update and to receive comments from the affected property owners and interested community members. The District analysis concluded that a fee increase is necessary to fully fund the necessary transportation improvements. The proposed District fee is $14,700 per FDU. The proposed fees for various land use types are shown in the table below. Land Use Category Proposed District Fee (City and Count Residential: Single Family (per Unit) $14,700 Townhouse/Condo(per Unit) $11,760 Apartment(per Unit $10,290 Non -Residential: Commercial(per Gross Acre $73,500 Industrial (per Gross Acre) $44,100 In addition to the above proposed rates, a rate sheet for nontypical land uses, which includes special cases such as senior housing, mobile homes, churches, and golf courses, has been developed. Traffic impacts for each category were used to develop the rates. AMENDMENT TO THE EASTSIDE BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT March 26, 2002 — Page 3 In April 2002, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors is scheduled to consider this item. The Board adoption of the District's fee amendments will make the fee charged by the County consistent with what is proposed to be adopted by the City. Members of the Technical Subcommittee raised concerns regarding the financial impact that the proposed fees would have on smaller developments currently in the approval process. To address this issue, staff is recommending that developers be given the option of paying the existing fee rate or the proposed rate during the time period between the effective date of the proposed fee and September 1, 2002 (assuming the effective date is prior to September 1). This will allow projects that are in the later stages of design to move forward as planned during this period. Developers paying the lower rate will receive credits based on the existing rate structure. Under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guideline 15378(b)(4), the establishment of the District fee does not constitute a "project," and therefore does not in itself create any environmental impact to be mitigated. The public hearing has been properly noticed. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Reject the proposed amendments to the Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District. 2. Direct staff to prepare an alternate report utilizing changed or modified criteria to amend the impact fee district. 3. Continue the Public Hearing on the proposed amendments to the Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District to a future meeting. 4. Other action as determined by the City Council FISCAL IMPACT Adopting the proposed fee will provide the funding necessary to construct the transportation improvements needed to accommodate the traffic generated by new development. However, if the City does not adopt the proposed amendments to the District and continues to collect the originally adopted fee, there will be insufficient funds within the District to fully improve all major roadways in the Eastside District. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Amending Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Eastside Bridge and Thoroughfare District Maps Santa Clarita Valley B&T District Boundary Map Report on Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District, March 2002 (available in City Clerk's reading file) council\B&T_Opdate Eastside_reso.doc FINAL REVIEW COPY Revised: March 20, 2002 EASTSIDE BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT UPDATE REPORT Prepared for: LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS and CITY OF SANTA CLARITA TRANSPORTATION and ENGINEERING SERVICES d \ MARCH. 2002 Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY..............................................................................................1 11. THE BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT................................................................................................ 4 A. AUTHORITY......................................................................................................... 4 _ B. PURPOSE............................................................................................................ 5 C. CONCEPT............................................................................................................5 D. DISTRICT FORMATION AND STATUS................................................................... 5 111. EASTSIDE AREA ACCESS................................................................. 10 .� A. BACKGROUND.................................................................................................. 10 B. EXISTING CIRCULATION AND PROPOSED DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS .............. 10 - IV. THE EASTSIDE BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT....................................................... 12 A. THE DISTRICT BOUNDARY................................................................................ 12 B. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND ESTIMATED COSTS ..................................... 12 C. IMPROVEMENT PHASING................................................................................... 14 D. DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS................................................................................14 �. E. TRAFFIC AND LAND USE ANALYSIS.................................................................. 14 F. THE DISTRICT FEE............................................................................................ 15 G. CONSTRUCTION OF DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS IN LIEU OF PAYING FEES AND CREDIT/CASH REQUESTS............................................................................... 18 H. PROVISIONS FOR UPDATING COSTS AND UNIT INFORMATION ........................ 19 I. PROPOSAL FOR DISTRICT CLOSURE...............................................................20 J. DISTRICT FUNDS..............................................................................................20 K. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS..................................................................... 21 County of Los Angeles City of Santa Clar/ta I XVdmiM509915099-AO .s(side 96AEa&f,d. DiVwt Rep 42002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report FIGURES FIGURE 1 DISTRICT BOUNDARYAND REGIONAL IMPROVEMENTS................................................... 22 FIGURE DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS................................................................................................. 23 FIGURE 3 FILED MAPS AND VACANT LAND...................................................................................... 24 .— TABLE 1 TABLE 2 TABLE 3 TABLE 4 TABLE 5 TABLE 6A TABLE 6B TABLE 7 TABLE 8 TABLE 9A TABLE 9B TABLE 9C TABLE 10 TABLES CURRENTDISTRICT FEES................................................................................................... 2 PROPOSEDDISTRICT FEES................................................................................................ 3 DESCRIPTION OF ORIGINAL ROADWAY AND BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS .............................. 6 ANALYSIS OF DISTRICT FUNDS.......................................................................................... 9 SOFT COST PERCENTAGES.............................................................................................. 13 BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE IMPROVEMENTS ................................................ C-2 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE IMPROVEMENTS... C-3 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS...................................................................................... C-8 DISTRICT SHARE OF REGIONAL IMPROVEMENTS........................................................... C-9 FDU ESTIMATE (FILED MAPS WITHIN THE DISTRICT)...................................................... D-2 FDU ESTIMATE (VACANT LAND -CITY -NO FILED MAP) ..................................................... D-3 FDU ESTIMATE (VACANT LAND -COUNTY -NO FILED MAP) .............................................. D-4 SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS........................................................................ D-4 ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT B ATTACHMENT C ATTACHMENT D ATTACHMENT E ATTACHMENTS CODE PERTAINING TO B&T DISTRICTS................................................................... A-1 LEGALDESCRIPTION................................................................................................ B-1 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND ESTIMATED COSTS .............. C-1 DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS....................................................................................... D-1 BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT CASH/CREDIT REQUEST FORM........................................................................ E-1 County of Los Angeles City of Santa Clarita 11 XWdmin\5 M5099-WAEastside B&nEestside Distnct RepW2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report _ The Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report presents to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and the City of Santa Clarita City Council an update for their approval to an existing area of benefit for financing specific improvements in the Eastside area of the Santa Clarita Valley, within Los Angeles County and City of Santa Clarita jurisdictions. Improvements include, but are not limited to, new and improved roadways, bridges, intersections, and interchanges. Updating the Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District, hereinafter referred to as "District", will provide an equitable financing mechanism by which new development within an identified area will share the costs of providing full mitigation improvements, as discussed in this summary. State Subdivision Law and both the Los Angeles County and City of Santa Clarita codes authorize the use of bridge and major thoroughfare construction fee districts for the funding and construction of improvements, provided these facilities are identified on the local agency's adopted transportation element of its General Plan. Based on the transportation needs in this area of the Santa Clarita Valley, and the limitations of other funding sources, this funding method has been determined to be the best alternative to provide needed transportation related improvements. This report describes the concept and mechanics of the District. Information included in this report will enable subject property owners to determine the District fee to be assessed against their property if and when it is developed. BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICTS IN THE SANTA CLARITA VALLEY Certain areas of Los Angeles County and the City of Santa Clarita have topographical features that limit the ability to provide access. Prior to the 1980's, the County was able to assist developers in the funding and construction of needed highway improvements. However, gas tax revenue, formerly the traditional source of funding for new highway and bridge improvements, has not provided sufficient funding towards improvements in the Santa Clarita Valley. Due to the regional nature of many of the District improvements, the District shall pursue funding for eligible improvements from City, County, State, and Federal agencies, to supplement the adopted District fee. The current highway system in the Santa Clarita Valley is considered adequate for existing development. However, at this time public funding is not available to adequately provide highway improvements for the future anticipated development in the Santa Clarita Valley. The Santa Clarita Valley Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Districts are designed to accommodate the needs of future development anticipated by both the Los Angeles County and City of Santa Clarita General Plans. A map showing the district is included as Figure 1. County of Los Angeles City of Santa Clarita XB dmm\5099\5099-0 Masfsde BSM.tsida D.Wd Repod2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report NEED FOR DISTRICT UPDATING The District was originally approved by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on July 21, 1987 as the "Route 126 Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District". After its incorporation, the City of Santa Clarita adopted the District on November 28, 1989. The current District fee in the City of $10,000 was approved by the City Council on September 14, 1999 and the Board of Supervisors approved the current District fee in the County on May 9, 1991. The District was renamed the "Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District" under the City of Santa Clarita's Resolution 93-4 on January 12, 1993. The current District fees are shown in Table 1. TABLE 1 CURRENT DISTRICT FEES 5 ^ H ,g" r N i yg ttti' L .3Y�� d Residential: Single Family (per unit) $4,800 $10,000 Townhome/Condo (per unit) $3,840 $8,000 Apartment (per unit) $3,360 $7,000 Non -Residential: Commercial (per gross acre) $24,000 $50,000 Industrial (per gross acre) $14,400 $30,000 The District was originally established for the purpose of funding much-needed improvements to serve the circulation needs created by new developments within this District, originally estimated as $81.70 million. This District update is different from updates in the past where the District fee has been revised due only to changes in improvement costs and in the amount of proposed future development. This update re -analyzes build -out development of the District and expands on the scope of District improvements. Instead of including only nine improvement projects, the updated District proposes to fully improve all roadways identified on the City and County circulation elements, including intersections and interchanges. Full mitigation improvements will include full -width grading, base, pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, medians, striping for capacity enhancement, bus turnouts or bus pads (where applicable), bike lanes (where applicable), fully improved and signalized intersections, signal interconnect (where applicable), street lighting, roadway -related utility relocation, drainage structures within road right-of-way, and full improvements for bridges and interchanges. Right of -way is assumed County of Los Angeles ♦ - 2 City of Santa Clarita X M.r\5099\5099-04TEaVvde B&T\EesWde DisMct R.p d2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report to be dedicated by individual development projects, except for State highway projects and roadway widenings that are unrelated to private development projects. UPDATED DISTRICT FEE RATES A development analysis, based on filed tentative maps, mid -point densities of the Santa Clarita Valley Area Plan, and mid -point densities of the City of Santa Clarita Zoning map, indicates that an estimated 12,598 residential units, 487 commercial land use acres, and 157 industrial land use acres are expected to be built within the District boundary. Remaining District improvements to roadways, bridges, intersections, and interchanges total an estimated $236.94 million. The analysis concludes that a District fee increase is necessary to fully fund these improvements. The proposed District fees are shown in Table 2. TABLE 2 PROPOSED DISTRICT FEES ^� n Y f r3 Residential: Single Family (per unit) $14,700 Townhome/Condo (per unit) $11,760 Apartment (per unit) $10,290 Non -Residential: Commercial (per gross acre) $73,500 Industrial (per gross acre) $44,100 County of Los Angeles City of Santa Clarita XMdmm%5099 5099-04TEastside BBAEastmde District Repod2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare _ Construction Fee District Update Report A. AUTHORITY The State of California Government Code Section 66484, regarding Subdivisions, gives local agencies the authority to adopt local ordinances that "may require the payment of a fee as a condition of approval of a final map or as a condition of issuing a building permit for purposes of defraying the actual or estimated cost of constructing bridges over waterways, railways, freeways, and canyons, or constructing major thoroughfares." The local adopted ordinance must refer to the circulation element of its general plan, provide for a public hearing, provide for the establishment of boundaries of an area of benefit, and provide for the identification of the costs, a fair method of allocation of costs to the area of benefit and a fair fee apportionment (to be disclosed at the public hearing). Further, the local ordinance must provide that the payment of fees shall not be required unless the major thoroughfares are in addition to or a reconstruction of any existing thoroughfares serving the area at the time of district adoption, and that the planned bridge facility is an original bridge serving the area, or an addition to any existing bridge facility serving the area, at the time of district adoption. It must further provide that if owners of more than one-half of the area of property to be benefited by the improvement(s) file proper written protests, the district proceedings as proposed shall be abandoned for at least one year. The local ordinance allows acceptance of considerations in lieu of the payment of fees, permits a local agency to advance money from its general fund or road fund to be reimbursed from bridge and major thoroughfare funds, permits a local agency to incur an interest bearing indebtedness for the construction of bridge or major thoroughfare facilities, and does not preclude an agency from providing funds for the construction of bridge or major thoroughfare facilities to defray costs not allocated to the District. The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 82-0050 on March 2, 1982, adding Section 21.32.200 to the Los Angeles County Code, providing for the establishment of bridge and major thoroughfare construction fees to be paid by subdivider or building permit applicants. Within the City of Santa Clarita, payment of such fees is established by City of Santa Clarita Subdivision Code Section 16.21.190 established on November 24, 1992. These codes are consistent with the requirements and provisions of the State law (County Code Section 21.32.200 and City Code Section 16.21.190 are included in Attachment A). County of Los Angeles City of Santa Clarita X'W MinW9M5099-04AEastsl a BSAEastmde Dmfmt RePM2002.do Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare _ Construction Fee District Update Report B. PURPOSE The District has been designed to accommodate the needs of future development anticipated by the City of Santa Clarita General Plan and the Los Angeles County Area Wide General Plan. Updating the District will provide local and regional benefits. Many of the District improvements will be eligible for local, state, and federal funding. The District intends to pursue all potential sources of out -of -district funding for these improvements including, but not limited to, State and Federal Gas Taxes, Propositions A and C Sales Tax, Transportation Planning and Development Sales Tax on Gasoline, County Transportation Tax, State Transportation Improvement Program funding, Federal Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21a` Century funds, State and Federal Highway Trust Funds, special grants, and other sources that may be available. The District will provide the matching funds necessary to pursue greater funding from the aforementioned sources. A reasonable amount of outside funding has been anticipated and formulated into the proposed District fees. If outside funding, not anticipated in the District formation analysis or update, is received; or if funds anticipated are not received, the District costs will be revised, and the District fee may be adjusted accordingly. C. CONCEPT As authorized by statutes cited above, the adoption of a specific area of benefit permits the County and City to levy a fee against future development located within the area of benefit. This funding method appropriately assesses developments, which create the need for additional improvements, for the additional public facility costs. The charge is levied in proportion to the estimated number of trips generated by the development, which is translated into Factored Development Units (FDUs). FDUs are described in more detail in the "Development Analysis" section of this report. The adoption of this type of funding district does not charge existing development. The District fee is collected at the time of recordation of a final map or just prior to the issuance of a building permit. D. DISTRICT FORMATION AND STATUS The District was originally approved by the Los Angeles Board of Supervisor's on July 21, 1987 for the purpose of financing highway and bridge improvements in the Eastside area of the Santa Clarita Valley. After incorporation, the City of Santa Clarita adopted the District on November 28, 1989. Nine projects were proposed for construction within the original District including Golden Valley Road, Lost Canyon Road, Newhall Ranch Road, Oak Springs Canyon, Sand Canyon Road, Shadow Pines Boulevard, Soledad Canyon Road, Via ., Princessa, and Whites Canyon Road for a total cost originally estimated at $81.70 million. These original roadway and bridge improvements are listed and described in Table 3. Due County of Los Angeles ♦ 5 City of Santa Clarita XMdmin\5099\5099-04TEawvde B6T\Eastwde Di&Mct ReMa2002. doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare — Construction Fee District Update Report to inflation, the estimated project costs have been increased substantially. The original — improvements proposed to be funded by the District were derived from determination of the traffic needs of the then anticipated 32,919 residential units, 635 acres of industrial development and 644 acres of commercial development expected within the area of benefit and an analysis of highways (including bridges) designated on the Highway Plan of the adopted County General Plan. The District has funded the completion of several of the original improvements. Completed improvements are identified in Table 3. The amount of District fees collected and expended in the District, along with accrued interest is summarized in Table 4. -- TABLE 3 DESCRIPTION OF ORIGINAL ROADWAY AND BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS Completed. ` IrtiptI00# Deschptlgrf ^ GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD: SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD TO GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE Soledad Canyon Road to Via Princessa Grading Drainage Base and pavement $1,885,000 New signal Preliminary and construction engineering Via Princessa to Sierra Highway RNV acquisition Grading Drainage $5,535,000 Base and pavement New signal Preliminary and construction engineering Sierra Highway to Green Mountain Drive R/W acquisition Grading Drainage $3,180,000 Base and pavement Preliminary and construction engineering LOST CANYON: VIA PRINCESSA TO SAND CANYON ROAD Via Princessa to Canyon Park Boulevard Grading Drainage Partial Base and pavement $3,320,000 Bridge construction over Southern Pacific Railroad Preliminary and construction en ineerin county of Los Angeles ♦ 6 City of Santa Clarita X�dmin%50995099-NAEastside B81\Eests,de District Report2002doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report TABLE 3 DESCRIPTION OF ORIGINAL ROADWAY AND BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS County of Los Angeles City of Santa Clarita XWdmiM50915099-NMastside B&Mastside Dlstmt Re M2002.do Canyon Park Boulevard to Sand Canyon Road RNV acquisition Levee construction Grading Drainage $4,830,000 Base and pavement Full -width bridge construction over Sand Canyon Wash New signal Preliminary and construction engineering OAK SPRINGS CANYON: LOST CANYON ROAD TO SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD Lost Canyon Road to Soledad Canyon Road Grading Base and pavement Bridge construction over Santa Clara River $1,470,000 Drainage New signal Preliminary and construction engineering ROUTE 126: GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD TO SR -14 Golden Valley Road to Soledad Canyon Road R/W acquisition Grading Drainage Base and pavement $23,847,000 Bridge construction over the Santa Clara River Levee improvement work Preliminary and construction engineering Soledad Canyon Road to Sierra Highway RNV acquisition Grading Drainage $18,824,000 Base and pavement Bridge construction over Southern Pacific Railroad Preliminary and construction engineering Sierra Highway to SR -14 Full -width bridge at Sierra Highway Interchange improvements with connecting ramps from $7,775,000 Route 126 to SR -14 SAND CANYON ROAD: AT SR -14 AND AT SANTA CLARA RIVER At SR -14 Widen existing Sand Canyon Bridge over SR -14 Widen the existing ramp from SR -14 northbound to Sand Canyon Road from one lane to two lanes Yes Widen existing bridge approached on Sand Canyon Road $880,000 Drainage Signal modification Preliminary and construction engineering County of Los Angeles City of Santa Clarita XWdmiM50915099-NMastside B&Mastside Dlstmt Re M2002.do Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report TABLE 3 DESCRIPTION OF ORIGINAL ROADWAY AND BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS County of Los Angeles ♦ 8 City of Santa Clarita X W dmin\50995099-N4 astside B&T astside Distdct Rep H2002.doc �r>z Aek, 9 e At Santa Clara River Widen bridge over Santa Clara River $920,000 Widen highway approaches Preliminary and construction engineering SHADOW PINES BOULEVARD: GRANDIFLORAS DRIVE TO BEGONIAS LANE Grandifloras Drive to Begonias Lane Base and pavement $230,000 Curb and gutter SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD: SAND CANYON ROAD TO OAK SPRINGS CANYON ROAD AND FROM SHADOW PINES BOULEVARD TO SR -14 Sand Canyon Road to Oak Springs Canyon Road RNV acquisition Grading Yes Drainage $1,830,000 Full -width roadway improvements New signal Preliminary and construction engineering Shadow Pines Boulevard to SR -14 Grading Drainage $750,000 Yes Base and pavement New signals Preliminary and construction engineering VIA PRINCESSA: TRACT NO. 38519 TO WHITES CANYON ROAD Tract 38519 to Whites Canyon Road RNV acquisition Grading Drainage Yes Full -width roadway improvements $3,060,000 Base and pavement Curb and gutter Full -width bridge at the Southern Pacific Railroad and Route 126 Preliminary and construction engineering WHITES CANYON ROAD: VIA PRINCESSA TO SIERRA HIGHWAY (THIS PORTION NOW REFERRED TO AS VIA PRINCESSA) Via Princessa to Sierra Highway RNV acquisition Grading Yes Drainage $3,360,000 Half -width roadway improvements Half -width bridge at the Southern Pacific Railroad and wash Preliminary and construction engineering Total: $81,696,000 County of Los Angeles ♦ 8 City of Santa Clarita X W dmin\50995099-N4 astside B&T astside Distdct Rep H2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report TABLE 4 ANALYSIS OF DISTRICT FUNDS County of Los Angeles ♦ 9 City of Santa Clarita XWdminiMW5099-04TEastslds 13&�irstside District Repo42002 doc Collections $21,924,447 $11,527,117 $33,451,564 Expenditures $21,301,254 $13,524,358 $34,825,612 Interest $1,049,830 Funds Available -$324,220 County of Los Angeles ♦ 9 City of Santa Clarita XWdminiMW5099-04TEastslds 13&�irstside District Repo42002 doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report A. BACKGROUND Historically, access to new development has been provided cooperatively by the County and land developers. The County funded its share with Gas Tax Funds. Land development was primarily concentrated in flatter areas, expanding away from urban centers. Public facilities were constructed to accommodate this expansion. ._ Much of the development in recent years and that which is expected to occur in the future is and will be in outlying areas where topography is more rugged and restrictive. As a result, the cost of providing necessary public facilities, including roadways will continue to increase. B. EXISTING CIRCULATION AND PROPOSED DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS The primary road network for the District consists of State Route 14 (Antelope Valley Freeway), five interchanges with SR -14, and twelve arterials which are classified as Major, Secondary, or Limited Secondary Highways on the City of Santa Clarita Circulation Element and the Los Angeles County Santa Clarita Valley Area Wide Circulation Plan. In the past, updates have been prepared to specifically reflect changes in improvement costs of anticipated future development. This update differs from previous updates in that it _ re -analyzes build -out development of the District and expands the scope of District improvements. Instead of including only nine improvement projects, the updated District proposes to provide full mitigation for all roadways identified on the City and County .. circulation elements, including intersections and interchanges. Full mitigation improvements will include full -width grading, base, pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, medians, striping for capacity enhancement, bus turnouts or bus pads (where applicable), bike lanes (where applicable), fully improved and signalized intersections, signal interconnect (where applicable), street lighting, roadway -related utility relocation, drainage structures within road right-of-way, and full improvements for bridges and interchanges. Right of -way is assumed to be dedicated by individual development projects, except for State highway projects and roadway widenings or roadway construction that are unrelated to private development projects. The arterials for the District are described below. Intersection improvements along the arterials and regional improvements are described in the Proposed Improvements and Estimated Costs Section of this Report. 1. VIA PRINCEssA ROAD: (major highway) varies from 5 to 6 lanes from Jason Drive to 0.7 mile west of Whites Canyon Road. Via Princessa will be improved to 6 lanes from the northerly boundary of Golden Valley Ranch to the westerly District boundary. County of Los Angeles ♦ 10 City of Santa Clarita Xb dmin\50W5099-W\Eastside BBTEestside Distmt Repod2002,doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare — Construction Fee District Update Report 2. WHITES CANYON ROAD: (major highway) is 4 lanes from Via Princessa to the northerly District boundary. Roadway improvements include striping to 6 lanes. Whites Canyon Road will be improved to 4 lanes from the Bouquet Canyon District boundary to Vasquez Canyon Road. 3. GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD: (major highway) varies from 2 to 4 lanes between Green Mountain Drive and SR -14 and from Golden Triangle to Hope Canyon Road. Golden Valley Road will be improved to 6 lanes from SR -14 to the northerly District boundary. 4. LOST CANYON ROAD: (major/limited secondary highway) is 2 lanes from Sand Canyon Road to the City Limit and is partially constructed from Via Princessa to Canyon Park Boulevard. Lost Canyon Road will be improved to 6 lanes from Via Princessa to Sand Canyon Road. 5. SIERRA HIGHWAY. (major highway) varies from 2 to 6 lanes from the northerly District boundary to Dockweiler Drive. Sierra Highway will be improved to 6 lanes from the Via Princessa District boundary to the northerly District boundary. 6. SAND CANYON ROAD: (secondary/limited secondary highway) varies from 2 to 3 lanes between Sierra Highway and Placerita Canyon Road. Sand Canyon Road will be improved to 6 lanes from Lost Canyon Road to Soledad Canyon Road, including a 6 -lane bridge over the Santa Clara River. Sand Canyon Road will be improved to 4 lanes from Soledad Canyon Road to Sierra Highway. Sand Canyon Road will remain 2 lanes with minor drainage improvements from the easterly District boundary to Lost Canyon Road. However, right-of- way will be reserved for 6 lanes. 7. SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD: (major highway) varies from 4 to 6 lanes from the westerly District boundary to the Soledad Canyon Road/SR-14 interchange. Soledad Canyon Road is 2 lanes from Soledad Canyon Road/SR-14 interchange to the easterly District boundary. The District will fund 4 of the 6 (2 additional) lanes from Soledad Canyon Road/SR-14 ramps to the easterly District boundary. 8. SHADOW PINES BOULEVARD: (secondary highway) is 4 lanes from Soledad Canyon Road to Begonias Lane and is 2 lanes from Begonias Lane to the City Limit. Shadow Pines will be improved to 4 lanes from Begonias Lane to Davenport Road. 9. CANYON PARK BOULEVARD/JAKES WAY: (secondary highway) is 2 lanes from the Union Pacific Railroad tracks to SR -14. Canyon Park will be improved to 4 lanes from Sierra Highway to Lost Canyon Road. 10. VASQUEZ CANYON ROAD: (secondary highway) is 2 lanes from the Bouquet Canyon District Boundary to Sierra Highway. Vasquez Canyon Road will be improved to 4 lanes from the Bouquet Canyon District boundary to Sierra Highway. 11. DAVENPORT ROAD: Is 2 lanes from Sierra Highway to the easterly District boundary. Davenport Road will be improved to 4 lanes from Sierra Highway to the easterly District boundary. 12. SANTA CLARITA PARKWAY.- is proposed as a 6 -lane major highway from the westerly District boundary to Sierra Highway. County of Los Angeles City of Santa Clanta X:Wdmin\50M5099-0 Masfside BBTEasfside Distort Report2002do Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report A. THE DISTRICT BOUNDARY �- The legal description of the District (Area of Benefit) is included as Attachment B. It encompasses those properties, which have yet to be developed, and which will receive _ benefit from the improvements funded by the District. A map showing the location of the District is included as Figure 1. The boundaries were determined by the topographical features in the Eastside area, ownership/parcel lines, national forest land boundaries, and existing and future access. GENERAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION The District includes the existing Canyon Country community and lies generally within the Friendly Valley, Mint Canyon, Sand Canyon, and Vasquez Canyon areas of the Santa Clarita Valley. Generally, the District's northern, eastern, and southern boundary lines follow the Angeles National Forest and private ownership boundary lines. The westerly District boundary is shared with the Via Princessa and Bouquet Canyon Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Districts along a north -south ridgeline approximately through and northerly of the intersection of Sierra Highway with Soledad Canyon Road and along the first and second Los Angeles Aqueducts. B. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND ESTIMATED COSTS Improvements to be funded by the District are based on a determination of the traffic needs _ of future development anticipated by the City and County General Plans and an analysis of the improvements designated on the highway plans of the adopted City of Santa Clarita Circulation Element and the County Highway Plan. Improvements and associated costs have been estimated for purposes of determining the District fee rates. Actual scope of work and costs may change as the improvements approach the final design stage. Estimated costs of District improvements include construction costs based on "prevailing wage" and cost of materials; design costs and permitting fees, considered "soft costs" and included in Table 5; and an administrative/management fee equal to 5% of the wage, materials, and soft costs. County of Los Angeles ♦ -- 12 City of Santa Clarita X\Admin%5099 5099-04 rrstside &&TEastslde District Report2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report TABLE 5 SOFT COST PERCENTAGES The bridge and major thoroughfare improvements for highway segments and bridges are listed in Table 6A (Attachment C). Table 6A also includes limits of the proposed improvements and an estimated cost. A detailed listing of work items required for each highway segment and bridge is included in Table 6B (Attachment C). Intersection improvements, along with a description and estimated cost, are included in Table 7 (Attachment C). Several interchanges have been identified as "regional" improvements. Therefore, each District being updated at this time will pay its "fair share" for each regional improvement based on the respective District's percent share of projected vehicle trips that encounter the improvement. Regional improvements; along with a description, percent share according to District, total estimated cost, and estimated cost to the District; are included in Table 8 (Attachment C). Regional improvements are shown in Figure 1. All District improvements to roadways, bridges, intersections, and interchanges are shown in Figure 2 and described, with estimated costs, in Attachment C. Total costs for the remaining District -identified improvements total an estimated $237.37 million as summarized below. Highway Segments and Bridges ..................... $188.87 million Intersections........................................................ $6.80 million District Share of Regional Improvements .......... $41.70 million Estimated Cost of Improvements ..................... $237.37 million County of Los Angeles ♦ 13 City of Santa Clarita X:Wdmin\50M099-NMostside B&T\Eestsids Distnct Report2002.doc �d 6 V", IlV0Y2 Al y 2K AyVi2 ' xt Engineering -Design 10% 8% 6% 5% 8% 8.5% Plan Check 3% 2.5% 2% 2% 3% 3% Engineering -Field 3% 2% 5% 4% 7% 3% Survey 3% 4% 5% 5% 8% 3% Soils 1% 2% 5% 3% 7% 1% Geology 0% 0% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0% Bonds/Fees 1% 8% 10% 4% 10% 1% Erosion Control (SWPPP) 0.5% 0% 0.5% 0% 0.5% 0.5% Army Corps/Fish & Game — Environmental Inspections 0% 0% 0% 1% 0 0 /0 9 0 /9 TOTAL: 21.5% 26.5% 34.0% 24.5% 44.0% 20% The bridge and major thoroughfare improvements for highway segments and bridges are listed in Table 6A (Attachment C). Table 6A also includes limits of the proposed improvements and an estimated cost. A detailed listing of work items required for each highway segment and bridge is included in Table 6B (Attachment C). Intersection improvements, along with a description and estimated cost, are included in Table 7 (Attachment C). Several interchanges have been identified as "regional" improvements. Therefore, each District being updated at this time will pay its "fair share" for each regional improvement based on the respective District's percent share of projected vehicle trips that encounter the improvement. Regional improvements; along with a description, percent share according to District, total estimated cost, and estimated cost to the District; are included in Table 8 (Attachment C). Regional improvements are shown in Figure 1. All District improvements to roadways, bridges, intersections, and interchanges are shown in Figure 2 and described, with estimated costs, in Attachment C. Total costs for the remaining District -identified improvements total an estimated $237.37 million as summarized below. Highway Segments and Bridges ..................... $188.87 million Intersections........................................................ $6.80 million District Share of Regional Improvements .......... $41.70 million Estimated Cost of Improvements ..................... $237.37 million County of Los Angeles ♦ 13 City of Santa Clarita X:Wdmin\50M099-NMostside B&T\Eestsids Distnct Report2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report C. IMPROVEMENT PHASING Generally, the timing and phasing of construction of District improvements will be determined by when and where development occurs, as well as how many units. The amount of funds received may also determine the timing of improvements. D. DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS Future development is expected within the District and can be measured in terms of FDUs. The Quantity of FDUs was estimated for all vacant land within the District. Where a map has been filed (pending, approved, or recorded but not built) to develop vacant land, the FDUs were calculated from the residential development units and non-residential acreage specified in the filed map. Table 9A (Attachment D) includes a list of filed maps; along with the residential units, non-residential acres, and estimated FDUs. Conditioned fees associated with filed maps are also included in Table 9A (Attachment D) were applicable. The location and status of filed maps are shown in Figure 3. The Quantity of FDUs for the remaining vacant land, within the City of Santa Clarita, was estimated based on the City of Santa Clarita zoning map and mid -point densities. Table 913 (Attachment D) includes a summary of vacant land within the City of Santa Clarita, zoning designations, and estimated FDUs. The Quantity of FDUs for the remaining vacant land, within Los Angeles County, was estimated based on the land use categories and mid -point densities designated in the Santa Clarita Valley Area Plan. Table 9C (Attachment D) includes a summary of vacant land within Los Angeles County, county land use designations, and estimated FDUs. Table 10 (Attachment D) summarizes the development units for residential land uses, the acres for non-residential land uses, and the estimated FDUs for residential and non-residential land uses. The location of vacant land, were no map has been filed, is also shown in Figure 3. This analysis shows expected future development estimated at 14,238 FDUs, consisting of 12,598 residential units, 487 commercial acres, and 157 industrial use acres. E. TRAFFIC AND LAND USE ANALYSIS The existing highway system adequately handles the traffic generated by existing development located within the District. As such, existing development would not require the additional highway improvements if additional development did not occur. Therefore, the improvements identified in this report are intended to accommodate the circulation needs of future development within the District and are expected to improve circulation for future development within the District. Regional improvements within, or funded by, this District are expected to improve circulation for future development on a Valley -wide basis. County of Los Angeles ♦ 14 City of Santa Clarita XWmin\5099\5099-0 Mastside B&T astside Distnct Repod2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report Based on average mid -point densities and filed tentative maps, 58% of the future units will be single-family; 25% of the future units will be townhouse -type; and the remaining 17% of the future units will be apartments. Non-residential uses are projected as 76% commercial and 24% industrial. The anticipated development quantified in the Development Analysis ` section and categorized above will require an improved circulation system. F. THE DISTRICT FEE The District fee is calculated by dividing the estimated net cost of the remaining improvements by the estimated number of FDUs. The tables in Attachment D include an ` analysis of the estimated number of FDUs in the District. The net cost is the total estimated cost of improvements (included in Attachment A) minus anticipated grant funding, funds _ available as shown in Table 4, and District fees committed through developer agreements (See Table 9A). The total estimated cost of improvements, net cost of improvements, remaining development measured in FDUs, and the calculated District fee is shown below: Estimated Cost of Improvements ..................... $237.37 million Anticipated Grant Funding ................................. $24.39 million Funds available in District .................................. -$0.32 million Fees committed in Developer Agreements.......... $3.46 million Net Cost of Improvements ............................... $209.84 million Remaining Development ............................. 14,238 FDUs District Fee per FDU................................... $14,700 / FDU _ To ensure equity of District fee assignment, the proposed District fee is proportionate to the degree to which future developments benefit from the proposed improvements. Therefore, the proportionate shares take into account the impacts of peak -hour vehicle trips on the system as identified in the City of Santa Clarita and Los Angeles County Circulation Plans. Each of the five major land use categories have assigned FDUs based on the average impact for that category relative to a single-family residence as shown below: Single Family........................................................ 1.0 FDU Condominium/Townhouse.....................................0.8 FDU Apartment............................................................. 0.7 FDU Commercial (per gross acre) ................................. 5.0 FDUs Industrial (per gross acre) ..................................... 3.0 FDUs County of Los Angeles ♦ 15 City of Santa Clarita X:Wdmm%50M5099-09 .stsOe BBPEestside DaWd Rep d2002.dm Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report Future development's units and/or acres are multiplied by the assigned FDUs and multiplied by the District's adopted District fee per FDU resulting in a project's proportionate share of District fees. The District fees for each of the five major land use categories are included in Table 2. The adoption of this type of funding district does not levy any fees against existing development. FDUs for recorded subdivisions, which are located within the District, were not included in the District fee calculation, as it has been assumed that District fees were paid at recordation. If District fees were not paid at recordation for non-residential land uses in the County area, then District fees may be collected for the issuance of a building permit. Because the City of Santa Clarita allows some projects to pay District fees after recordation at the building permit stage, some recorded maps were included in the development analysis. SPECIAL CASES Governmental Uses Governmental improvements, such as those for schools, police, fire protection, and libraries, specifically needed to support benefited development, have been excluded from the development analysis as these uses are assumed to be exempt from District fee payment. .. Lands with Physical Development Constraints The County General Plan includes designations for floodways, Significant Ecological Areas (SEA), and public service related lands. The City assigns such areas urban zoning designations. The updated District fee reflects potential development for all vacant lands with urban only zoning designation. Typically, very few FDUs are assigned to these areas. Additionally, lands with physical development constraints such as landslides, faults, or other restricted use areas were considered for future development according to their County - assigned land use or City zoning designation. This assumption was made since, in many cases, these types of constraints can be mitigated. Furthermore, these restricted use -type areas can often be used to accommodate development features such as parking lots and setbacks; and residential densities or non-residential square footage can often be transferred from landslide areas to other developable portions of a site. Non -Typical Cases The City and/or County may develop and have on file a rate sheet for non -typical land uses that do not fit the generally adopted fee rate categories. Special calculations for non -typical land uses may also be considered at the discretion of either the City or the County. Non -Residential Land Development not including a Land Division The City and County codes regarding bridge and major thoroughfare fee payment allow for the collection of District fees at either the map recordation or building permit phases of a County of Los Angeles ♦ 16 City of Santa Clarita X:Wdmin\5099\5099-09TEeffiside BBTEasfwde DmfW Remo 2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report project. It is the County's policy to collect only at map recordation unless no land division is proposed. District fees for land development not including a land division shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. District fees for non-residential uses that are part of a land division will be calculated based on the gross acreage within the map's boundaries. District fees for non-residential uses on a vacant parcel that does not include a land division — will be calculated based on the gross acreage within the vacant parcel boundary. District fees for non-residential uses on an under-utilized parcel that does not include a land division will be calculated, at the discretion of the County or City, based on one of the following calculations: Retail Commercial Total District Fee Obligation = gross building square footage x 5 x District Fee per FDU 16,335 A typical District fee calculation for a retail commercial development involving a land division would assume gross project acreage (all area within a map or lot's boundaries) times 5 FDUs times the District fee per FDU. However, the above calculation determines the District fee obligation by estimating the gross project acreage based on a proposed building's gross square footage and an assumed Floor Area Ratio (FAR). For example, using an FAR of 0.375:1 (as outlined in the City of Santa Clarita's Unified Development Code for retail commercial uses), a retail commercial building on a one -acre (43,560 square feet) parcel would yield a building square footage of 16,335 (43,560 x 0.375 = 16,335). Conversely, if a lease project is submitted for District fee payment, an assumed gross acreage can be determined by taking the building's gross square footage and dividing it by 16,335, the equivalent of one acre of retail development. Office Commercial/Business Park Total District Fee Obligation = gross building square footage x 5 x District Fee per FDU 43,560 Using an FAR of 1.0:1, an office commercial/business park building on a one -acre (43,560 square feet) parcel would yield a building square footage of 43,560 (43,560 x 1.0 = 43,560). Again, if a lease project is submitted for District fee payment, an assumed gross acreage can be determined by talking the building's gross square footage and dividing it by 43,560, essentially one acre of commercial office development. The UDC identifies a 1:1 FAR for Business Park, a 1.25:1 FAR for Commercial Office, and a 0.75:1 FAR for Industrial Commercial. Thus, for the purposes of this analysis, a 1:1 FAR was used. County of Los Angeles ♦ 17 City of Santa Clarita X'Vdmin\5099\5099-09TEastside 8&T astside Dlstml Repon2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report Industrial Total District Fee Obligation = gross building square footage x 3 x District Fee per FDU 29,403 Using a FAR of 0.675:1, industrial construction on a one -acre parcel would yield a building square footage of 29,403 (43,560 x 0.675 =29,403). Again, if a lease project is submitted for District fee payment, an assumed gross acreage can be determined by taking the building's gross square footage and dividing it by 29,403, essentially one acre of industrial development. District fees for a lease building are not required if the underlying land paid District fees based on gross acreage, including the land on which the lease building is to be sited. It should be noted that if a project proposes an upgraded use from that which was paid for the underlying parcel the project would be subject to the difference in fees between that which was paid and the proposed use. Under-utilized parcels, such as those that may accommodate a future lease structure, were not assumed in the development analysis, as these parcels are difficult to identify. G. CONSTRUCTION OF DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS IN LIEU OF PAYING FEES AND CREDIT/CASH REQUESTS If a developer constructs District -identified improvements, that developer becomes eligible for District credit which can be used to offset District fee payments. If the cost of the completed and accepted improvements, along with the soft costs and 5% administrative/management fee, exceeds the District fee obligation, the developer would be given a credit which can be used to offset future District fee obligations within the District. If adequate funds are available, the developer may receive a cash reimbursement. A developer has the following options with regard to construction of District -identified improvements: Construct District -identified improvements for District credit. Construct District -identified improvements and receive cash reimbursement from the District. To receive District credit or cash reimbursement from the District for constructed and accepted improvements, the proper documentation must be submitted to the County or City. Required documentation includes the "Bridge and Major Thoroughfare District Cash/Credit Request" form (included as Attachment E) and all applicable attachments documenting construction costs. No documentation for the 5% administrative/management fee is required. County of Los Angeles ♦ 18 City of Santa Clarita XWdminWM50930 Masfside B&T Bsfside Distncf Rep x2002. dm Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report Upon submittal of a request for a withdrawal from the District, review and determination by the City and/or County will be completed within 60 days. After the "Bridge and Major Thoroughfare District Cash/Credit Request" form has been submitted and approved, withdrawal of District funds will be authorized if the City and/or County deem that sufficient funds are available in the District account, based on a review of District priorities. If a developer constructs improvements beyond its conditioned obligation, District credit and/or cash may be given subsequent to the improvement's completion and acceptance as long as the improvement has been described in this report as a District improvement. The City and/or County will accept improvements for maintenance upon completion and field acceptance. If a condition of project approval requires a landowner to dedicate property as right-of-way for a State improvement, then the landowner will receive credit at fair market value for the property dedicated. Additionally, if any local improvement requires land acquisition from a third party, the cost of the property will be added to the cost of the improvement. However, if right-of-way is required to be dedicated for a County or City improvement as a condition of project approval, the landowner receives no credit for the value of the dedicated property. Therefore, the cost estimates prepared for District improvements reflect costs for right-of- way as described above. It may be permissible for developer/landowners to receive reimbursement for the construction of District -identified improvements from District funds as described in this report once improvements are completed and accepted by the City or County. H. PROVISIONS FOR UPDATING COSTS AND UNIT INFORMATION Projections for build -out development and the cost of the improvements located within the area of benefit may change over time. Project scope may change due to refinement and the need to comply with requirements imposed by other agencies, including, but not limited to, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). A reasonable amount of outside funding has been anticipated and formulated into the proposed District fees. Outside funding, not anticipated in the District formation analysis or update, may be received or funds anticipated may not be received. Therefore, in order to equitably assess future development as well as collect sufficient funds to complete the improvements, it will be necessary to periodically re-evaluate the net cost of the improvements, the remaining land to be developed, and the type of development being constructed within the District and to adjust the District fee accordingly. Beginning July 1, 2002, and thereafter on each succeeding July 15', the District fees shall be adjusted as follows: calculate the percentage movement for the previous year in the Los Angeles Regional Construction Cost Index (CCI) based on Engineering News Record data for that period. Then, if the percentage movement equals or exceeds a two percent County of Los Angeles ♦ 19 City of Santa Clarita XWMin%509W5099-WAEestsde BBTTEestslde Distract Repod2002.doo Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report increase, the District fee per FDU will be increased by two percent and rounded up to the nearest $10. If the percentage movement increases less than two percent, the District Fee per FDU will be increased by the same percent as the percentage movement and rounded up to the nearest $10. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no such adjustment shall decrease any District fee. A separate biennial review to reassess development trends, construction costs, grant funding success, and refinement of project scope may also be conducted. 1. PROPOSAL FOR DISTRICT CLOSURE In the event that District fees collected from developers exceed the cost of improvements, the surplus funds, less administrative costs, will be refunded at District closure by the City and/or County to current owners in proportion to District fees paid. J. DISTRICT FUNDS The City and County will each maintain a separate District fund. Money may be transferred from one fund to the other for District purposes. City of Santa Clarita Any District fees paid by development projects within the City portion of the District may be loaned to other Districts within the City Limits. The loans may be used provided that loans are properly recorded by no less than a resolution approved by the City Council. This provision ONLY applies to the City of Santa Clarita portion of the B&T funds within each District. Pursuant to the above paragraph, the City shall make all funds or credits available to the District as necessary for the purpose of the City reimbursing or providing credit to developers/landowners as described in this report once improvements are completed and accepted. It will be the sole discretion of the City to determine whether developers/landowners will be provided a reimbursement or credit for improvements above B&T obligations. Los Angeles County For the County portion of the District, the County will not loan money out of the District as described above. County of Los Angeles ♦ - _ 20 City of Santa Clarita — X OdMiM509W5099-NT asfside BAl astside Dlst icf Repon2002 doc IE N 8 N m W �I Q a�¢e L e Q m Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report ATTACHMENT A CODE PERTAINING TO B&T DISTRICTS Board of Supervisors—Los Angeles County Code City of Santa Clarita, California—Municipal Code County of Los Angeles ♦ - A_f City of Santa Clarita X Ndmin\5099\5099-04TEastsde BBTEastside Disttict Repo02002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report COUNTY CODE: TITLE 58 Chapter 21.23 4 21.32.200 21.32.200 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND BRIDGE FEES. A. A subdivider, as a condition of approval of a final map for property within an area benefit, or a building permit applicant, as a condition of issuance of a building permit for property within an area of benefit, shall pay a fee as hereinafter established to defray the cost of constructing bridges over waterways, railways, freeways and canyons, and/or constructing major thoroughfares. B. Definitions. 1. Area of benefit means a specified area wherein it has been determined that the real property located therein will benefit from the construction of a bridge and/or major thoroughfare. 2. Bridge facility means any crossing for a highway or local road, involving a railway, freeway, stream or canyon, which is required by the General Plan in order to accommodate new urban development within the area of benefit. 3. Construction means and includes preliminary studies, design, acquisition of right-of-way, administration of construction contracts, and actual construction. 4. Major thoroughfare means those roads designated in the transportation element of the General Plan, the primary purpose of which is to carry through traffic and provide a network connecting to the state highway system. 5. The singular number includes the plural, and the plural the singular. C. The provisions herein for payment of a fee shall apply only if the bridge and/or major thoroughfare has been included in an element of the General Plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors at least 30 days prior to the filing of a map or application for a building permit on land located within the boundaries of the area of benefit. D. Payment of fees shall not be required unless any major thoroughfares are in addition to or a widening or reconstruction of any existing major thoroughfares serving the area at the time of the adoption of the boundaries of the area of benefit. E. Payment of Fees shall not be required unless any planned bridge facility is a new bridge serving the area or an addition to an existing bridge facility serving the area at the time of the adoption of the boundaries of the area of benefit. F. 1. Action to establish an area of benefit may be initiated by the Board of Supervisors upon its own motion or upon the recommendation of the Road Commissioner. County of Los Angeles ♦ A-2 City of Santa Clarita X Wd-M 5 W5099-04TEastside BBTEasfside Dmtnd RepM2002.d. Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report 2. The Board of Supervisors will set a public hearing for each proposed area benefited. Notice of the time and place of said hearing, including preliminary information related to the boundaries of the area of benefit, estimated costs and the method of fee apportionment shall be given pursuant to Section 65905 of the Government Code. G. 1. At the public hearing, the Board of Supervisors will consider the testimony, written protests and other evidence. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Supervisors may, unless a majority written protest is filed and not withdrawn, determine to establish an area of benefit. If established, the Board of Supervisors shall adopt a resolution describing the boundaries of the area of benefit, setting forth the cost, whether actual or estimated, and the method of fee apportionment. A certified copy of such resolution shall be recorded with the County Recorder. 2. Such apportioned fees shall be applicable to all property within the area of benefit, and — shall be payable as a condition of approval of a final map or as a condition of issuing a building permit for such property or portions thereof. Where the area of benefit includes lands not subject to the payment of fees pursuant to this section, the Board of Supervisors shall make provisions for payment of the share of improvement cost apportioned to such lands from other sources. 3. Written protest will be received by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at any time prior to the close of the public hearing. If written protests are filed by the owners of more than one-half of the area of the property to be benefited by the improvement, and sufficient protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the area represented by the protests to less than one-half of the area to be benefited, then the proposed proceedings shall be abandoned and the Board of Supervisors shall not, for one year from the filing of said written protests, commence or carry on any proceedings for the same improvement under the provisions of this section. Any protest may be withdrawn by the owner making the same, in writing, at any time prior to the close of the public hearing. 4. If any majority protest is directed against only a portion of the improvement, then all further proceedings under the provisions of this section to construct that portion of the improvement so protested against shall be barred for a period of one year, but the Board of Supervisors shall not be barred from commencing new proceedings not including any part of the improvement so protested against. Such proceedings shall be commenced by a new notice and public hearing as set forth in Subsection F above. 5. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the Board of Supervisors, within such one-year period, from commencing and carrying on new proceedings for the construction of an improvement or portion of the improvement so protested against if it finds, by the affirmative vote of four-fifths of its members, that the owners of more than one-half of the area of the property to be benefited are in favor of going forward with such improvement or portion thereof. County of Los Angeles ♦ A-3 — City of Santa Clarita X:Vdm)n\5 WS099-N AFastside B&T astside DW60 Repw2002. doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report H. Fees paid pursuant to this section shall be deposited in a planned bridge facility and/or major thoroughfare fund. A fund shall be established for each planned bridge facility project and/or each planned major thoroughfare project. If the benefit area is one in which more than one bridge and/or major thoroughfare is required to be constructed, a separate fund may be established covering all of the bridge projects and/or major thoroughfares in the benefit area. Moneys in such fund shall be expended solely for the construction or reimbursement for construction of the improvement serving the area to be benefited and from which the fees comprising the fund were collected, or to reimburse the County for the costs of constructing the improvement. I. The Board of Supervisors may approve the acceptance of considerations in lieu of the payment of fees established herein. J. The Board of Supervisors may approve the advancement of money from the General Fund or Road Fund to pay the costs of constructing the improvements covered herein and may reimburse the General Fund or Road Fund for such advances from planned bridge facility and/or major thoroughfare funds established pursuant to this section. K. If a subdivider, as a condition of approval of a subdivision, is required or desires to construct a bridge and/or major thoroughfare, the Board of Supervisors may enter into a reimbursement agreement with the subdivider. Such agreement may provide for payments to the subdivider from the bridge facility and/or major thoroughfare fund covering that specific project to reimburse the subdivider for costs not allocated to the subdivider's property in the resolution establishing the area of benefit. If the bridge and/or major thoroughfare fund covers more than one project, reimbursements shall be made on a pro rata basis, reflecting the actual or estimated costs of the projects covered by the fund. (Ord. 82-0240 Sec. 1, 1982; Ord. 82-0050 Sec. 1, 1982) 22.48.235. MAJOR BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEES. Except as otherwise provided in Section 22.48.280, a building or structure shall not be used on any lot or parcel of land, any -- portion of which is located within a Bridge or Major Thoroughfare District established pursuant to Section 21.32.200, unless the required district fee has been paid as a condition of issuing a building permit. (Ord. 85-0168, Sec. 34, 1985) 22.48.280. EXEMPTIONS - EXISTING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES. This Part 4 does not apply to the use, alteration or enlargement of an existing building or structure or the erection of one or more buildings or structures accessory thereto, or both, on the same lot or parcel of land, if the total value of such alteration, enlargement, or construction does not exceed one-half of the current market value of all existing buildings or structures on such lot or parcel of land. (Ord. 1494 Ch. 4 Art. 4 & 497. 1927.) county or Los Angeles ♦ A-4 City of Santa Clanta X Wdmin\50M5099-0 AEastside B&T\Easiside Disfnct Rep a2002,doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare .� Construction Fee District Update Report CITY CODE 16.21.190 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND BRIDGE FEES — A. A subdivider, as a condition of approval of a final map for property within an area of benefit, or a building permit applicant, as a condition of issuance of a building permit for property within an area of benefit, shall pay a fee hereinafter established to defray the costs of constructing bridges over waterways, railways, freeways, and canyons, and/or constructing major thoroughfares. B. The provisions herein for payment of a fee shall apply only if the bridge and/or major thoroughfare has been included in an element of the General Plan adopted by the City Council at least 30 days prior to filing of a map or application for a building permit on land located within the boundaries of the area of benefit. C. Payment of fees shall not be required unless any major thoroughfares are in addition to, or a widening or reconstruction of, any existing major thoroughfares serving the area at the time of the adoption of the boundaries of the area of benefit. D. Payment of fees shall not be required unless any planned bridge facility is a new bridge serving the area or an addition to an existing bridge facility serving the area at the time of the adoption of the boundaries of the area of benefit. E. 1. Action to establish an area of benefit may be initiated by the City Council upon its own motion or upon the recommendation of the City Engineer. 2. The City Council will set a public hearing for each proposed area of benefit. Notice of the time and place of said hearing, including preliminary information related to the boundaries of the area of benefit, estimated costs and the method of fee apportionment shall be given pursuant to Section 65905 of the Government Code. F. 1. At the public hearing, the City Council will consider the testimony, written protests and other evidence. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council may, unless a majority written protest is filed and not withdrawn, determine to establish an area of benefit. If established, the City Council shall adopt a resolution describing the boundaries of the area of benefit, setting forth the cost, whether actual or estimated, and the method of fee apportionment. A certified copy of such resolution shall be recorded with the County Recorder. 2. Such apportioned fees shall be applicable to all property within the area of benefit, and shall be payable as a condition of approval of a final map or as a condition of issuing a County of Los Angeles ♦ A-5 City of Santa Clarita XWdmin\5099\5099-N7Easfsde B&i astsitle Distort Repod2002tloc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report building permit for such property or portions thereof. Where the area of benefit includes lands not subject to the payment of fees pursuant to this section, the City Council shall make provision for payment of the share of improvement cost apportioned to such lands from other sources. 3. Written protest will be received by the Clerk of the City Council at any time prior to the close of the public hearing. If written protests are filed by the owners of more than one- half of the area of the property to be benefited by the improvement, and sufficient protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the area represented by the protests to less than one-half of the area to be benefited, then the proposed proceedings shall be abandoned and the City Council shall not, for one year from the filing of said written protests, commence or carry on any proceedings for the same improvement under the provisions of this section. Any protest may be withdrawn by the owner making the same, in writing, at any time prior to the close of the public hearing. 4. If any majority protest is directed against only a portion of the improvement, then all further proceedings under the provisions of this section to construct that portion of the improvement so protested against shall be barred for a period of one year, but the City Council shall not be barred from commencing new proceedings not including any part of the improvement so protested against. Such proceedings shall be commenced by a new notice and public hearing as set forth in Section F above. 5. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the City Council, which in such one-year period, from commencing and carrying on new proceedings for the construction of an improvement or portion of the improvement so protested against if it finds, by the affirmative vote of four-fifths of its members, that the owners of more than one-half of the area of the property to be benefited are in favor of going forward with such improvements or portion thereof. G. Fees paid pursuant to this section shall be deposited in a planned bridge facility and/or major thoroughfare fund. A fund shall be established for each planned bridge facility project and/or each planned major thoroughfare project. If the benefit area is one in which more than one bridge and/or major thoroughfare is required to be constructed, a separate fund may be established covering all the bridge projects and/or major thoroughfares in the benefit area. Moneys in such fund shall be expended solely for the construction of the improvement serving the area to be benefited and from which the fees comprising the fund were collected, or to reimburse the City for the costs of constructing the improvement. H. The City Council may approve the acceptance of considerations in lieu of the payment of fees established herein. I. The City Council may approve the advancement of money from the General Fund or Road Fund to pay the costs of constructing the improvements covered herein and may reimburse County of Los Angeles ♦ A-6 City of Santa Clarita XMdMM\5099\5099-N7 Eestside B41�Eastwde OisMct Repon200Zdoc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report the General Fund or Road Fund for such advances from planned bridge facility and/or major thoroughfare funds established pursuant to this section. J. If a subdivider, as a condition of approval of a subdivision, is required or desires to construct — a bridge and/or major thoroughfare, the City Council may enter into a reimbursement agreement with the subdivider. Such agreement may provide for payments to the subdivider from the bridge facility and/or major thoroughfare fund covering that specific project to reimburse the subdivider for costs not allocated to the subdivider's property in the resolution establishing the area of benefit. If the bridge and/or major thoroughfare funds cover more than one project, reimbursements shall be made on a pro rata basis, reflecting the actual or estimated costs of the project covered by the fund. SUBDIVISION CODE City of Santa Clarita, California 11/24/92 County of Los Angeles ♦ A_7 City of Santa Clarita XMdmin\5099\5099-04T astside B&T aslside DisMct Report2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare ,._ Construction Fee District Update Report ATTACHMENT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION County of Los Angeles ♦ B_t _ City of Santa Clarita XWdmi,,NW 95099-04 aslside B&nEasfsiae District Report2002. doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare — Construction Fee District Update Report LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE AREA OF BENEFIT KNOWN AS EASTSIDE BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT THAT PORTION OF THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THAT PORTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED BOUNDARIES: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RAGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 16 TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY LINES OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 IN SECTION 21, SAID LAST MENTIONED TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 4 IN SAID LAST MENTIONED SECTION TO THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SIERRA HIGHWAY, 120 FEET WIDE, AS SAME EXISTED ON MARCH 4, 2002; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY TO THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD, AS SAME EXISTED ON SAID DATE; THENCE WESTERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD >• TO A LINE 50 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLE TO, THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF TRACT NO. 23365, AS SHOWN ON MAP FILED IN BOOK 760 PAGES 29 AND 30, OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED PARALLEL LINE TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 82 OF County of Los Angeles City of Santa Clarita X \Admin\5099\5099-N4 astside B&nEastside District Report2WZdoc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report TRACT NO. 30317 AS SHOWN ON MAP FILED IN BOOK 740, PAGES 97 TO 100, '— INCLUSIVE, OF SAID MAPS; THENCE NORTHERLY, NORTHWESTERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY, NORTHEASTERLY AND NORTHERLY BOUNDARIES OF SAID — LAST MENTIONED LOT AND FOLLOWING THE SAME ALONG ALL ITS VARIOUS COURSES AND CURVES TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 57 OF TRACT NO. 30319 AS SHOWN ON MAP FILED IN BOOK 757 PAGES 43, 44 AND 45, OF SAID MAPS; THENCE WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY LINES OF SAID LAST MENTIONED LOT TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 55 OF SAID LAST MENTIONED TRACT; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LAST MENTIONED TRACT TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF TRACT NO. 8575 AS SHOWN ON MAP FILED IN BOOK 117 PAGES 64, 65 AND 66, OF SAID MAPS; THENCE WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY BOUNDARIES OF SAID LAST MENTIONED TRACT AND FOLLOWING THE SAME ALONG ALL ITS VARIOUS COURSES TO THE MOST WESTERLY, NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LAST MENTIONED TRACT; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LAST MENTIONED TRACT TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT 2 AS SHOWN ON LICENSED SURVEYOR'S MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 27 PAGE 40, OF RECORDS OF SURVEYS, IN SAID OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED NORTHERLY BOUNDARY TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6449 PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 69 PAGES 8 TO 10, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, IN SAID OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 4; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, NORTHWESTERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY, NORTHEASTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINES OF SAID PARCEL 4 TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 4; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE AND ITS SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION, AND ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF THE FIRST LOS ANGELES AQUEDUCT AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 6449 FOLLOWING THE SAME IN ALL ITS VARIOUS COURSES TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 62 OF ST. JOHN SUBDIVISION PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 196 PAGES 306 TO 309, INCLUSIVE, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF SAID REGISTRAR -RECORDER; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF Uounry Or Los Hngetes • B-3 City of Santa Clarita XAd.m\5099\5099-04TEastsl B&Tastsld. DmOct RepH2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED JUNE 9, 1997, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 97-855038 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF SAID REGISTRAR - RECORDER; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY AND —. SOUTHERLY LINES OF SAID LAND TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 62; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 16 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG LAST SAID SOUTHERLY LINE AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE SECOND LOS ANGELES AQUEDUCT; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY TO THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE FIRST LOS ANGELES AQUEDUCT WITHIN SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG LAST SAID PROLONGATION AND LAST SAID SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY TO THE EAST -WEST CENTER LINE OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID EAST -WEST CENTER LINE — TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5 TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 15 ACRES OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 2 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2 TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 4 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 3 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3 OF County of Los Angeles ♦ B_4 City of Santa Clarlta XWdm1n\509915099-0 Mastside BV)Eestside District Repor12002doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare _ Construction Fee District Update Report SAID SECTION 3; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3 TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3 A DISTANCE OF 15.00 CHAINS; THENCE EAST 15.00 CHAINS; THENCE SOUTH 5.00 CHAINS; THENCE EAST 10.00 CHAINS; THENCE SOUTH 5.00 CHAINS; THENCE EAST 5.00 CHAINS; THENCE SOUTH 5.00 CHAINS TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 10.00 CHAINS MORE OR LESS TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 3 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 2 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINES OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST -HALF OF THE EAST - HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EAST -HALF OF THE EAST -HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2 TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 1; THENCE EASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY LINES OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF County of Los Angeles ♦ B-5 City of Santa Clarita X Udmin\50W5099-04 \Eastside BBTEasfside Distad Repoa2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare _ Construction Fee District Update Report SAID SECTION 1 TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 1; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTH -QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE NORTH -SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 OF SAID SECTION 1; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 14 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINES OF SECTIONS 31, 30 AND 19 OF TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 14 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 19 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 14 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 17 TO THE WEST - QUARTER CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTH -HALF OF SAID SECTION 17 TO THE EAST -QUARTER CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 17 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 14 WEST; SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINES OF SECTIONS 8 AND 5 OF TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 14 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5 AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 14 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 32 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 14 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINES OF SAID SECTION 29 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 14 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 30 TO THE NORTH -QUARTER CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE NORTH - SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 30 TO THE SOUTH -QUARTER CORNER THEREOF; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 30 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES SECTION 36, 35 AND 34 OF TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 34 TO THE NORTHWEST County of Los Angeles ♦ B-6 City of Santa Clarita — X?Admin\5099\5099-04AEasfslde BV\Eastmde 0isfricf Report2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report CORNER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG WESTERLY LINES OF SECTIONS 3 AND 10 OF TOWNSHIP NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. County of Los Angeles ♦ B_7 City of Santa Clarita X'Wdmin\5099\5099-0 AEastslde 8&rZastslde Distnct Repo 2002. doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report ATTACHMENT C DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND ESTIMATED COSTS County of Los Angeles City of Santa Clarita XVdmm%509955099-N AEastside B&T aslslde DUMcf Repon2002.doc 1 Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report TABLE 6A BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE IMPROVEMENTS County of Los Angeles City of Santa Clarita X: dmin\5099\5099-NMastslde B&nEesfslde Datnct Repoa2002.doc 2 } yyH SR -14 to the northerly District boundary l Golden Valley Road $28,958,320 Whites Canyon Road District boundary to Vasquez Canyon Road $5,545,380 Vasquez Canyon Road District Boundary to Sierra Highway $21,876,580 Santa Clarita Parkway District Boundary to Sierra Highway $1,270,380 Via Princessa Road Northerly boundary of Golden Valley Ranch to the wester) District boundar $25,928,390 Soledad Canyon Road Westerly District boundary to the easterly District boundary $8,263,790 Sierra Highway Southerly District boundary to the northerly District boundar $19,795,060 Davenport Road Sierra Highway to the easterly District boundary $8,809,160 Shadow Pines Blvd Begonias Lane to Davenport Road $13,243,320 Sand Canyon Road y Soledad Canyon Road to easterly District boundary and Soledad Canyon Road to Sierra Highway$32,028,670 Lost Canyon Road Via Princessa to Sand Canyon Road $21,807,390 Canyon Park Boulevard Sierra Highway to Lost Canyon Road $345,200 TOTAL: $188,871,640 County of Los Angeles City of Santa Clarita X: dmin\5099\5099-NMastslde B&nEesfslde Datnct Repoa2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report TABLE 6B DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE IMPROVEMENTS County of Los Angeles ♦ C-3 City of Santa Clarita XWdmin\5099\5099-04TEaststde B&1 as(side Distdcf Raort2002doc mi Golden Valley Road E-0100 Via Princessa to South End of Bridge over SR -14 6 Lane Street Construction E-0101 N. End of Bridge over SR -14 to Green Mountain Signing and striping Grading E-0102 Green Mountain to Sierra Hwy 6 Lane Street Construction Landslide Mitigation Bus Turnouts E-0103 Sierra Hwy to via Princessa Sidewalk -two sides Street Lights E-0104 Via Princessa to Interchange Grading 6 Lane Street Construction E-0105 Interchange at Soledad Canyon Road to Northerly District Grading boundary 6 Lane Street Construction Whites Canyon Road E-0202 Westerly District boundary to Vasquez Canyon Road Grading 4 Lane Street Construction Vasquez Canyon Road Grading E-0300 Westerly District boundary to Whites Canyon Road 4 Lane Street Construction Right-of-way acquisition Grading E-0301 Whites Canyon To Sierra Hwy 4 Lane Street Construction Right-of-way acquisition Santa Clarita Parkway E-0402 Westerly District Boundary to Sierra Hwy Grading 6 Lane Street Construction Via Princessa Road E-0501 Santa Clarita Pkwy to Golden Valley Road Grading 6 Lane Street Construction E-0502 Golden Valley Road to Rainbow Glen Grading 6 Lane Street Construction Street Widening to 6 lanes Right-of-way acquisition E-0503 Rainbow Glen to May Way Bus Turnouts Street Lights Sidewalk -two sides Signing and striping E-0504 May Way to Whites Canyon Signing and striping Bus Turnouts Signing and Striping E-0505 Whites Canyon to Weyerhaeuser Way Median Bus turnouts E-0506 Weyerhaeuser Way to Sierra Highway Bus Turnouts Signing and Striping E-0507 Sierra Hwy to Antelope Valley Freeway Bus Turnouts County of Los Angeles ♦ C-3 City of Santa Clarita XWdmin\5099\5099-04TEaststde B&1 as(side Distdcf Raort2002doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report TABLE 6B DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE IMPROVEMENTS County of Los Angeles City of Santa Clarita X Utlmin\5 M5099-04 . Vside B&AEaVf ide Distnct Report2002.tloc w Lost Canyon Road to the northerly boundary of Golden Valley E-0508 Median Ranch Signing and striping Bus Pads Soledad Canyon Road E-0600 Westerly District Boundary to Ruether Bus Turnouts E-0601 Ruether Avenue to Rainbow Glen Bus Turnouts E-0602 Rainbow Glen to Langside Avenue Bus Turnouts E-0603 Langside Avenue to Camp Plenty Road Bus Turnouts E-0604 Camp Plenty Road to Whites Canyon Bus Turnouts E-0605 Whites Canyon to Crossglade Avenue Median Bus Turnouts E-0606 Crossglade Avenue to Luther Drive Partial Median Bus Turnouts E-0607 Luther Drive to Shangri-la Drive Bus Turnouts E-0608 Shangri-la Drive to Sierra Highway Median Bus turnouts E-0609 Sierra Highway to Solemint Road Bus Turnouts Signing and striping Median E-0610 Solemint Road to Galeton Road Bus turnouts Sianina and stri in Bus Turnouts E-0611 Galeton Road to Anne Freda Street Interconnect Signing and striping E-0612 Anne Freda Street to Kenroy Avenue Bus Turnouts Signing and Striping E-0613 Kenroy Avenue to Sand Canyon Road Bus Turnouts Signing and Striping E-0614 Sand Canyon Road to SR -14 Westbound Ramps Signing and Striping E-0615 SR -14 Westbound Ramps to Oak Spring Canyon Bus Turnouts Signing and striping E-0616 Oak Spring Canyon to Flowerpark Drive Bus Turnouts Signing and striping E-0617 Flowerpark Drive to Poppy Meadow Street Bus Turnouts Signing and triping E-0618 Poppy Meadow Street to Shadow Pines Boulevard Bus Turnouts and Striping E-0619 Shadow Pines Boulevard to SR -14 Ramps (County) -Signing Bus Pads Signing and striping Street Widening to 4 lanes Grading Signing and Striping E-0620 SR -14 Ramps to Easterly District Boundary Sidewalk -two sides Street lights Bus Pads Rlqht-of-way acquisition E-6206 Bridge over Creek Widen LLI County of Los Angeles City of Santa Clarita X Utlmin\5 M5099-04 . Vside B&AEaVf ide Distnct Report2002.tloc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report TABLE 6B DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE IMPROVEMENTS ID �� 'U v' � 1 "F�y/{�■�f�siaYlE� �4.'.r"r a�.M'l+e n.',m'?;i i. r .....'� a. :„?'#F P,a Sierra Highway E-0700 Southerly District Boundary to Placenta Canyon Road Bus Turnouts Signing and striping E-0701 Placenta Canyon Road To Golden Valley Road Bus Turnouts Signing and striping E-0702 Golden Valley Road to Rainbow Glen Drive Bus Turnouts Signing and striping E-0703 Rainbow Glen Drive to Friendly Valley Parkway Bus Turnouts Signing and stri in E-0704 Friendly Valley Parkway to Whispering Leaves Drive Bus Turnouts Signing and striping E-0705 Whispering Leaves Drive to Via Princess Bus Turnouts Signing and striping E-0708 SR -14 off ramps to Canyon Park Drive Bus Turnouts E-0709 Canyon Park Drive to Jakes Way Bus Turnouts E-0710 Jakes Way to Soledad Canyon Road Bus Turnouts Median E-0711 Soledad Canyon Road to Scherzinger Lane Bus Turnouts Signing and striping Interconnect Street Widening to 6 lanes Median E-0712 Scherzinger Lane to Sierra Cross Road Sidewalk -two sides Bus Turnouts Signing and striping Interconnect Street Widening to 6 lanes Median Sidewalk -two sides E-0713 Sierra Cross Road to City Limit Bus Turnouts Signing and striping Street Lights Interconnect Right-of-way acquisition Street Widening to 6 lanes Median Sidewalk -two sides E-0714 City Limit to Sand Canyon Road (County) Street Lights Bus pads Signing and striping Interconnect Street Widening to 6 lanes Median Sidewalk -two sides E-0715 Sand Canyon Road to Vasquez Canyon Road (County) Street Lights Bus pads Signing and striping Interconnect Right-of-way acquisition E -715B Bridge over creek Widen County of Los Angeles ♦ C-5 City of Santa Clarita X \Admin\5099\5099-0 nEastside B&AEasfside Diffina Re ort2002 do Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report TABLE 6B DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE IMPROVEMENTS county of Los Angeles ♦ C-6 City of Santa Clarita .� XWdmin1509915099-0 nEastside BB Mastside Distnct Repoa2002.doc ' } Street Widening to 6 lanes Median Sidewalk -two sides E-0716 Vasquez Canyon Road to Davenport Road (County) Street Lights Bus pads Signing and striping Interconnect Right-of-way acquisition Street Widening to 6 lanes Median Sidewalk -two sides E-0717 Davenport Road to Northerly District Boundary (County) Street Lights Bus pads Signing and striping Interconnect DavenportRoad Grading E-0800 Sierra Highway to Shadow Pines Boulevard (County) 4 Lane Street Construction Right-of-way acquisition Grading E-801 Shadow Pines Boulevard to Easterly District Boundary (County) 4 Lane Street Construction Right-of-way acquisition Shadow Pines Blvd E-0900 Soledad Canyon Road to Begonias Lane (City) Signing and striping Interconnect Street Widening to 4 lanes Median E-0901 Begonias Lane to Grandifloras Road (City) Sidewalk -two sides Signing and Striping Street Lights Right-of-way acquisition E-0902 Grandifloras Road to Davenport Road (County) Grading 4 Lane Street Construction E-9028 Bridge over creek Construct Bridge Sand Canyon Road Median E-1001 Soledad Canyon Road to SR -14 Eastbound Ramps Signing and striping Interconnect Street Widening to 6 lanes Median Sidewalk -two sides E-1002 SR -14 Eastbound Ramps to Lost Canyon Road Street Lights Bus turnouts Signing and Striping Interconnect E-10026 Bridge over Santa Clara River Widen Street Widening to 2 lanes Construct storm drain E-1003 Lost Canyon Road to Placenta Canyon Road Interconnect Right-of-way acquisition (for 6 I lanes county of Los Angeles ♦ C-6 City of Santa Clarita .� XWdmin1509915099-0 nEastside BB Mastside Distnct Repoa2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report TABLE 6B DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE IMPROVEMENTS County of Los Angeles ♦ C-7 _ City of Santa Clarita X Admin%5099 5099-NMastsid& B&nEastside District Repon2002.doc Hloh* 71, dhff`a. ..,^'',�.ss �s.r5 ifa's` .:r,.." ° E -1003B Bridge over Iron Canyon Creek Widen Street Widening to 2 lanes E-1004 Placenta Canyon Road to Easterly District Boundary Interconnect Street Widening to 4 lanes Grading Median E-1005 Soledad Canyon Road to City Limit Street Lights Sidewalk -one side Interconnect Signing and striping 4 Lane Street Construction E-1006 City Limit to Sierra Highway (County) Grading Right-of-way acquisition Lost Canyon Road Grading 6 Lane Street Construction E-1200 Canyon Park Boulevard to City Limit (County) Levee R.C. Box E -1200B Railroad crossing (County) Construct Bridge Street Widening to 6 lanes Median Sidewalk -one side Street lights E-1201 City Limit to Sand Canyon Road Interconnect Signing and striping Bus Turnouts Right-of-way acquisition Street Widening to 2 lanes E-1202 Sand Canyon to end of existing (City) Signing and striping Canyon Park Boulevard E-1300 Railroad Tracks to Lost Canyon Road (County) 4 Lane Street Construction County of Los Angeles ♦ C-7 _ City of Santa Clarita X Admin%5099 5099-NMastsid& B&nEastside District Repon2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report TABLE 7 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS County of Los Angeles ♦ C-8 City of Santa Clarita X.A4d..k509A5099-04M9sfside B&nEas(side Dishkf Repod2002,doc Estilnaipd', ID Location Description of Improvements EI -5 Soledad Canyon Road and Whites Intersection augmentation, Signal $1,215,500 Canyon Road modification, Right-of-way acquisition Soledad Canyon Road and Sierra Intersection augmentation, Signal $624,170 EI -9 Highway modification, Right of way acquisition Soledad Canyon Road and Shadow Intersection augmentation, Signal $771,150 EI -19 Pines Boulevard modification, Right of way acquisition EI -21 Sierra Highway and Golden Valley New 4 -way signal $180,600 Road EI -29 Sierra Highway and Sand Canyon Road Intersection augmentation, Signal $709,500 modification, Right of way acquisition Sierra Highway and Vasquez Canyon Intersection augmentation, Signal $709,500 EI -30 Road modification, Right of way acquisition EI -31 Sierra Highway and Davenport Road New 3 -way signal $154,800 EI -33 Via Princessa and Golden Valley Road New 4 -way signal $180,600 EI -38 Whites Canyon Road and Vasquez New 3 -way signal $154,800 Canyon Road EI -39 Davenport Road and Shadow Pines New 3 -way signal $154,800 Boulevard EI -41 Sand Canyon Road and Lost Canyon Intersection augmentation, Signal $923,640 Road modification, Right of way acquisition EI -42 Sand Canyon Road and Placerita New 3 -way signal $154,800 Canyon Road EI 46 Via Princessa and Sierra Highway Intersection augmentation, Signal $224,980 modification, Right of way acquisition EI -49 Via Princessa and Lost Canyon Road New 3 -way signal $154,800 EI -50 Lost Canyon Road and Canyon Park New 3 -way signal $154,800 EI -53 Golden Valley Road and Green New 4 -way signal $180,600 Mountain Road EI -54 Lost Canyon Road and Jakes Way New 3 -way signal $154,800 TOTAL: $6,803,840 County of Los Angeles ♦ C-8 City of Santa Clarita X.A4d..k509A5099-04M9sfside B&nEas(side Dishkf Repod2002,doc 11 W J D'1 U 0 h 0 o O o 0 0 0 c 0 C 0 C w C 10 C M N ( N N L 0 N N L EA 7 N L r O u H h fyOO C C 11 W J D'1 U o 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'p; 10 N N M N N M N N of N N aD R EA 7 N r O H fyOO 0 r r It N f7 cND W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o M N r m o r o O O Cli r 00 N a O M tD a r co CO CO r N r O N Il: R cD � O j� ci V r M N M 7 O N co R (V < 7 ' r N N � fA N fA M fA M fA fA N r W fA EA to f9 fA EA y N N N e N N N N N N N O Q '' O N O N M M tD cD W tO F- m VVRR O O N M M O O O O Q 4 w t$ Ql m o e e N o 0 N N C 0 0 0 0 N N M N O N M V N O N m � r ( m m O m+j O r M O LD WN W r N co r N M ONO V O M C o - ° ° o o o V N m m m m M O m N M M M N N 7 N O L c m 0 N O T N EFo m T N 3 O,E o U 65 _3 m o m o 3 10 y Q L U N Q U U Q O a a C a m L m C L C ,0. Q3m ��rnt31�� 3 3 m �O�O .N y .N -O T a N 0 .E L m j OIC N C a m a O C C C O E E m :o °? o'2 o .6 a Q v m a? ;oa. m m co 3 m in m c 05 2i U_ m m CO in <n m` in <n cn m m a O N W N a C O 7 U O c N c ac r O a a U) O LL N 'O T a a O •. m Z o m 3 c m c m N a m O O O � N m O N m m ° c 0 N LL a o tt o a c a c c v c J- Ol a a C O - aN c a @O c N a m N m C ° C 'O O « O T O c C C w a 00 O d N tp u1 O N j (0 Cl' C LL C N 0 0 m O C U ° U@ c C U 2 r/IN° tL E d = d N O CL a J� In U> N (n U `G LL d J (� i.I U > (n LL m �_ o o o K K af cr Kw C[ Q O O O O O O O 7 N N O O M N m m N O O O O O O O O O O O O O cL O O CL d O O O .- O > > > > > > > > > > > U U W W W W w U U Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report ATTACHMENT D DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS County of Los Angeles ♦ D-1 City of Santa Clanta X Wdmin1509ft099-W AEastslde RBAEastslde District Report2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report TABLE 9A FDU ESTIMATE (FILED MAPS WITHIN THE DISTRICT) Pending 116ps PM 16658 2 2 2 PM 20799 2 2 2 PM 21643 4 4 4 PM 22530 2 2 2 TR 45123 3fi 36 36 R 46760 8 8 8 R 47573 174 174 174 R 47574 152 152 152 R 48086 546 546 546 R 49024 84 84 64 TR 50262 20 20 20 TR 50467 172 172 172 TR 50514 0 0 21 64 64 TR 50592 94 94 14 42 136 R 50846 56 56 56 TR 52833 air Oaks 293 234 747 747 981 R 52938 192 154 154 R 49621 es Thompson Ranch 350 350 350 TR 52385 44 31 31 TR 52355 28 28 1 28 TR 52414 866 866 50 250 1,116 TR 53074 24 24 10.2 51 75 Approved *bps PM 14582 2 2 2 PM 16541 2 2 2 PM 21477 3 3 3 PM 22667 2 2 2 TR 32571 136 136 136 R 37038 45 45 45 R 43147 26 26 26 R 43729 544 435 0 1 435 R 45023 752 602 0 1 602 PM 20435 4 4 4 PM 20652 2 2 2 PM 20873 2 2 2 PM 21827 4 4 4 PM 21953 2 2 2 PM 22004 2 2 2 PM 22851 3 3 3 TR 25740 3 3 3 TR 34466 TR 42670 Santa Clarita Bus. Park $3.461,360 TR 43145 82 57 57 TR 46353 110 88 88 TR 47324 70 70 70 TR 47785 12 12 12 R 48379 35 28 28 R 48480 46 37 37 TR 48892 101 101 101 R 48893 163 163 163 TR 49771 28 22 22 TR 52608 63 50 50 RecordedWot Built Maps PM 21110 3 3 3 TR 45416 253 253 253 TR 52812 8 8 8 Totals 126 88.0 2063.0 1649.8 4215.0 4215.0 60.2 3010 35.2 105.7 6360 53461360 County of Los Angeles ♦ D-2 City of Santa Clarita X.Mdmin\5099\5099-04AEastside B&TEsstslde DlsMd Repod2002,doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report TABLE JB FDU ESTIMATE (VACANT LAND -CITY -NO FILED MAP) ain ie ramny INLkIVIUUn)1a,vl ZZI Ifol I iro Single Family RS 129.0 5 645 1 645 Single Family RVL 56.2 1 56 1 56 Single Family RVL MOCA 52.0 1 52 1 52 Single Family PVL(PD) 270.4 11 270 1 270 SubTotal 1157.7 1805 1805 Condominium / Townhouse MHP 0.0 11 0 0.8 0' Condominium/Townhouse RM 57.3 11 630 0.8 504 Condominium /Townhouse RM MOCA 11 0 0.8 0 Condominium I Townhouse RM PD 36 0 11 396 0.8 316.8 SubTotall 93.3 1026 821 Multi Family (apartment) RMH 20 0 0.7 0 Multi Family (apartment) RMH PD 101 81i 201 20361 0.7 1425.2 SubTota! 1 101.81 1 20361 1425 Commercial BP 111.5 N/A N/A 5 557.5 Commercial BP PD 167.1 NIA N/A 5 835.5 Commercial BP PD MOCA 28.9 N/A N/A 5 144.5 Commercial CC 48.3 N/A N/A 5 241.5 Commercial CC PD 35.8 N/A N/A 5 179 Commercial CN 0.9 N/A N/A 5 4.5 Commercial CN PD 28.1 NIA N/A 5 140.5 Commercial CO 6.3 N/A N/A 5 31.5 Commercial CO PD 0.0 NIA N/A5 0 Sub Total 426.9 0 2135 Industrial I N/A N/A 3 0 Industrial IC 25.5 N/A NIA 3 76.5 Industrial IC PD NIA N/A 3 0 Sub Tota! 25.5 0 77 Totall 4867 6263 County of Los Angeles ♦ D-3 _ City of Santa Clarita X?Admin\5099\5099-047'Easfside BBTEasfside risincf RepW2002. doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report TABLE 9C FDU ESTIMATE (VACANT LAND -COUNTY -NO FILED MAP) Single Family HM 0-50% 10% of Total 573.0 0.5 286.5711.1 Single FamilyHM > 50% 90% of Total 5157.0 0.05 257.9 Single FamilyN2 0-50% 10% of Total 33.7 0.5 16.8 Single FamilyN2 > 50% 90% of Total 303.1 0.05 15.2 Single FamilyN1 0-50% 40% of Total 43.4 0.5 21.7 Single FamilyN1 > 50% 60% of Total 65.2 0.05 3.3 Single FamilyU1 N/A 256.5 2.2 564.3 Single FamilyU2 N/A 32.3 5 161.5 SubTotaf 6464 1327 1327 Indusl tria N/A 96.5 NIA N/A 3 289.5 S, Total 97 290 Total 6561 1327 1611 Notes: HM Hillside Management: 90% of acreage = 60% -slope (.06 dufac); 10% of acreage= 0-50% slope (S dulac ) N2 Nonurban: 90% of acreage = 50%+slope (05 dulac); 10% of acreage = 0-60% slope ( 5 dulac.) N1 Nonurban: 60% of acreage = 50%= slope (.06 dulac); 40% of acreage= 0-50% slope (5 dulac ) U2 Urban: 5 duYac TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS County of Los Angeles ♦ D-4 City of Santa Clarita XWdm)n\5 M5099-04TEasfside BSTEasfside Dmtmt Report2002.doc Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report ATTACHMENT E BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT CASH/CREDIT REQUEST FORM County of Los Angeles ♦ E-1 City of Santa Clarita w• X:WdmiMWM5099-WEastside BBAEastside Distnct Report2002.doc District Percentages: Valencia Bouquet Canyon Eastside Castaic — Via Princessa Lyons Avenue/McBean Parkway Area Identification: Link#(s): — Project Description: Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Report Update BRIDGE & MAJOR THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT CASH/CREDIT REQUEST FORM % Amount: $ ❑ Cash ❑ Credit % Amount: $ ❑ Cash ❑ Credit % Amount: $ ❑ Cash ❑ Credit °/a Amount: $ ❑ Cash ❑ Credit °/a Amount: $ ❑ Cash ❑ Credit % Amount: $ ❑ Cash ❑ Credit Intersection #(s): Interchange #(s): ATTACHMENTS Yes No Not Applicable Signature Page Pro'ect Acceptance Letter Site Location Ma Contract & Change Orders Credit Summary Expense Summary Cancelled Checks & Supporting Documentation Additional Documentation Plans Completed by: Date: Name Title - Company Submitted to: Date: Name Title - County/City \ssigned to: Date: Name Title \pproved by: Date: Name Title 'ant to Fiscal by: Date: Name Title County of Los Angeles ♦ E-2 City of Santa Clarita XMdmin\5098\5099-NAEasfside B&TEastside Distncf Report2002.doc