HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-11-04 - AGENDA REPORTS - FINANCING OPPORTUNITIES (2)CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: ayor,M tubers of the City Council
FROM: Irab
ul amp, ity n er
DATE: November 4, 2003
SUBJECT: PARK, RECREATION, AND OPEN SPACE FINANCING
OPPORTUNITIES
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council receive presentation on park, recreation, and open space financing opportunities and
provide staff with direction.
BACKGROUND
The Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission has long been interested in the
concept of funding for additional park facilities, amenities, and open space to meet the need of
reducing the City's parkland deficit by means other than the City's General Fund.
Several discussions about alternative funding and a study session took place at Commission
meetings last year. In addition, Councilmember Ferry expressed interest in funding park
facilities using non -General Fund dollars. As a response to this inquiry, staff researched park
financing opportunities and a memo was provided to the Council on April 21, 2003.
Furthermore, in May 2003, the Commission received an overview of the alternative funding
options and after discussion, the Commission moved unanimously to pursue alternative financing
such as a bond, conduct a new poll of the community, and to ensure public participation is
aggressively pursued.
Today, we would like to present the City Council with information on alternative funding options
available to the City, allow the Council the opportunity to directly ask questions of the City's
bond counsel, and recommend that the Council provide staff with direction.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
Agend ►#em :=
FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal impact with this action.
ATTACHEMENT
Attachment 1— Park Financing Opportunities Memo to City Council dated April 21, 2003
Attachment 2 — Commission Action Memo dated May 29, 2003
KP:EG:ada
s\pang\Council Agendas 5 study sessions\park bond study session I 1-4-03 doc
CITY OF S._NTA CLARITA
INTEROFFICE ]1IEMOR:NNDUM
TO Smith and Councilmembers
�/��
FROM: en Puishamp, C°(tv M ager
DATE: April 21, 2003
SUBJECT: PARK FINANCING OPPORTUNITIES
At the request of Councilmember Ferry, staff has researched and prepared
information regarding park financing opportunities for the City Council's review and
consideration. Specifically, staff was asked to provide an overview of the financing
option that provides the City with the greatest flexibility to acquire real property,
construct park facilities, fund the procurement of park amenities, such as
playground equipment, and fund future/ongoing maintenance needs.
In reviewing potential park financing options with the City's Bond Counsel, staff
believes that the most Mable financing mechanism would be a Mello -Roos
(Communoty Special District) Special Tax Bond. A Special Tax Bond represents a
land -secured financing option that levies a special tax on properties located within a
pre -determined district.
The process to consider a Special Tax Bond would take approximately ten months to
one year. This process would require the City to hold a public hearing and conduct a
special election of all registered voters residing within the district boundaries. The
special election could be conducted by mailed ballot. The information below provides
the City Council with an overview of this funding option.
° City may determine boundaries of district; need not be contiguous.
° Broad discretion on design of tax and exemptions; may not be based on value
of property.
Public hearing required; if majority protest, may not raise issue for one year.
° Requires 2/3 affirmative vote of registered voters voting in the election.
Election process takes time.
Collection usually on tax rolls.
° Can be levied for improvement with useful life of five years or more or for
services.
To summarize, a Special Tax Bond provides a funding mechanism that allows the
City to assess residents in the district for costs associated with parkland acquisition,
capital improvement of parks, and the annual service or maintenance of parks. This
financing option could allow the City and County of Los Angeles to execute a Joint
Attachment 1
PARK FINANCING OPPORTUNITIES
April 21, 2003
Page 2
Powers Agreement JPA) for the purpose of creating a benefit district that could
encompass areas within both the incorporated City limits, as well as portions of the
unincorporated County.
At this time, staff estimates that the cost of forming a district and circulating mailed
ballots to consider a Special Tax Bond to finance parks could range from X60,000 to
$100,000. Costs associated with this financing option include the creation of the
Special District, the development of a special tax formula and a community, facilities
report, public relations and polling services, and tabulation of the mailed ballot
election process. Costs associated with a Special Tax Bond are recoverable if voters
residing in the district approve the measure.
Finally, the Special Tax Bond provides the City with some flexibility in determining
the geographic make-up of the district and who participates in the election process.
As the requirements of the Special Tax Bond process allows for non-contiguous
boundaries, the City has the ability to not include certain areas. Areas that the
Council could wish to exclude may range from low-income portions of the City to
areas where residents are already paying some type of parks -related special tax or
fees.
Finally, while a 2/3 vote is needed for passage of the measure, the Special Tax Bond
allows the City to conduct a mailed ballot election process that requires participation
among only registered voters residing within the district boundaries. While the City
could choose to conduct a more encompassing election, this financing mechanism
does not require a vote of all landowners within the district.
In conclusion, passage of the measure would require a supporting vote of at least 2/3
of the register voters residing in the distnct who vote. If a 2/3 approval were
achieved, the Special Tax would be levied on all properties encompassed within the
District.
If you have any questions regarding the information provided by staff, I can be
reached at (661) 255-4905.
KRP:KNMhds
KMT/s,,.al ProJec�Parks Bwd lofo
cc: Steve Stark, Director of Administrative Services
Rick Gould, Director of Parks, Recreation & Community Services
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Ken Pulskamp, City Manager
Rick Gould, Director of Parks, Recreation, and Community
May 29, 2003
Servic s
il I
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION ACTION ON ALTERNATIVE
FUNDING OPTIONS
The Parks and Recreation Commission has long been interested in the concept of funding by means
other than the City's General Fund for additional park facilities and amenities, especially to meet the
need of reducing the City's parkland deficit. In October 2003, the Parks and Recreation
Commission held a study session where they received information on alternative funding options to
address park and open space community needs.
At the May 8, 2003 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the Commission received an
overview of the alternative funding options that included General Obligation Bonds, Special Taxes,
and Special Assessment Financing. After discussion, the Commission moved unanimously as
follows:
1. Recommend to the City Council to approve staff recommendation for a Special Tax Bond
specific to parks and open space. (this recommendation was outlined in the attached
memorandum dated April 21, 2003 from Ken Pulskamp to City Council)
2. Provide funding to conduct a new poll of the community.
3. Ensure public participation is aggressively pursued by staff.
We have been coordinating with Steve Stark, Administrative Services Director, on the alternative
funding options. At this time we are forwarding this recommendation to the City Manager's Office
for direction from the City Council on next steps.
Please let me know what direction you would like staff to proceed with; I am available if you have
any questions.
RG:EG:
"I`cy'Cou1dW 1 m cn,.aoc
Attachment: Memorandum on Park Financing Opportunities dated April 21, 2003
cc: Steve Stark, Administrative ScrN ices Director
Attachment 2