Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-04-27 - AGENDA REPORTS - RESO PR&CS COMP & EXPENSES (2)Agenda Item: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA AGENDA REPORT CONSENT CALENDAR City Manager Approval: Item to be presented by: Darren Hernandez DATE: April 27, 2004 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, RELATING TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION COMPENSATION AND EXPENSES DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services RECOMMENDED ACTION City Council adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, Relating to the Planning Commission and the Parks, Recreation & Community Services Commission Compensation and Expenses. BACKGROUND Since 1988, three ordinances have amended sections of the Municipal Code to adjust compensation rates of the City's Planning Commission, as well as the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Commission. The last Commission compensation adjustment took place in May of 1996. With direction from the City Manager, staff conducted analysis inclusive of acquiring Commission compensation information from comparable cities, as well as evaluating the Consumer Price Index, to determine if a compensation adjustment for the City's Planning and Parks, Recreation & Community Services Commission is appropriate at this time. Currently, each of Santa Clarita's five members of the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Commission receives $95 per meeting, not to exceed a total compensation of $190 in any one month. Each of the five members of the Planning Commission receives $125 per meeting, not to exceed a total compensation of $500 in any one month. Staff surveyed seven other cities including: Glendale, Lancaster, Oxnard, Palmdale, Simi Valley, Thousand Oaks, and Ventura, to gain insight as to how other local government entities currently compensate Commission members. From the analysis, staff concluded that the City's Planning Commission compensation is approximately 13% lower than the average compensation rate of $141 per meeting. In regards to Parks, Recreation and Community Services Commission compensation, staff found that the City's compensation is approximately 5.25% lower than the average compensation of $100 per meeting. In addition, staff found that three of the seven cities manage Parks and Recreation Commissions where members are not compensated. At the regular meeting of the City Council on March 23, 2004, the City Council passed to second reading an ordinance enabling the City Council to adjust the rate of compensation for members of the Planning Commission and the Parks, Recreation & Community Services Commission from time to time as established by the City Council. At this time, staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to amend the Commission member compensation, commencing on July 1, 2004, to reflect cumulative adjustments of the Consumer Price Index (for the Los Angeles/Riverside/Orange County area, issued monthly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S Department of Labor), since the City's last Planning and Parks, Recreation & Community Services Commission Compensation adjustment in May of 1996. ALTERNATIVE ACTION 1. Do not approve resolution. 2. Other action as determined by Council. FISCAL IMPACT Staff recommends the revision of current Commission compensation is to adjust stipends to reflect cumulative adjustments in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) since the City's last Commission compensation adjustment in 1996. If current compensation rates are adjusted to remain parallel with the recent CPI information, an increase of approximately 20% in Planning and Parks, Recreation & Community Services Commission compensation would be appropriate. The following chart indicates monetary impact on a per -meeting and per -month basis: Planning Commission (Per Member Current Stipend New Stipend Per Meeting $125 $150 Maximum Per Month $500 $600 and Recreation Commission (Per Current Sti end New Stipend erMeetin $ 95 $114 Maximum Per Month $190 $228 If approved, staff will allocate sufficient funds for Commission compensation adjustments as part of the FY 2004/2005 budget process. ATTACHMENTS Resolution