Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-08-28 - AGENDA REPORTS - MC 04-325 HMNMH MP (2)Agenda Item: _ CITY OF SANTA CLARITA AGENDA REPORT PUBLIC HEARING City Manager Approval: Item to be presented by: isa Hardy DATE: August 28, 2007 SUBJECT: MASTER CASE 04-325, HENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENT: Community Development RECOMMENDED ACTION City Council receive staff and applicant presentations and public testimony, provide feedback on the revised Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital Master Plan, and continue the public hearing to the September 25, 2007, City Council meeting for a focused discussion on the revised Development Agreement. PURPOSE & AGENDA OF MEETING The agenda for tonight's public hearing on the HMNMH Master Plan will include the following components: 1. The City Council will first receive a presentation from City staff on the revisions to the HMNMH Master Plan project and work conducted since the June and July 2007 City Council meetings. 2. Staffs presentation will be followed by a presentation from the HMNMH applicant team. 3. The formal presentations will be followed by testimony from the public, both in support of and in opposition to the master plan proposal. 4. Following public testimony, the City Council will have an opportunity to ask questions of staff and the applicant team and provide direction to staff on the modified HMNMH Master Plan. Continued To; r ��� oCQ� i RECENT BACKGROUND The formal public hearing process before the Santa Clarita City Council for the proposed Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital (HMNMH) Master Plan project began on June 12, 2007. Two additional public hearings were held on June 26, 2007 and July 10, 2007. The public hearing was continued to tonights's meeting to allow time for the applicant to consider revisions to the project per the Council's direction and for staff to research and prepare responses to a variety of issues and questions raised at these meetings. The revised Development Agreement and the answers to issues and questions raised about the Development Agreement during the June and July 2007 City Council meetings will not be discussed at tonight's meeting. Instead, it is staffs recommendation to the City Council that the public hearing be continued to the City Council meeting on September 25, 2007, to allow for a detailed discussion of the revised Development Agreeement. Staff will provide the revised document, along with the responses to the issues raised at prior City Council meetings, well in advance of the September 25th City Council meeting, to allow ample time for City Council and public review of the documents. PROJECT DESCRIPTION In response to City Council input, the applicant has revised various components of the HMNMH Master Plan. As part of these modifications, the applicant has proposed to reduce the duration of the Master Plan from 20 years to a 15 -year period. This change in the project duration has been reflected in the revised project description. Project Square Footage/ Floor Area Ratio (FAR) The square footage totals for the proposed inpatient building and medical office buildings have not changed from the master plan presented to the City Council in June 2007. The project request before the City Council will increase the existing square footage of the hospital campus (30.39 acres) from 332,992 square feet to 660,355 square feet, a 327,363 net square -foot increase. A more detailed breakdown of square footage and floor area ratio calculations are provided below: Existing Square Footage of Project Site 1,323,788 square feet Existing Square Footage of the Buildings 332,992 square feet Existing Floor Area Ratio .25 to 1 Proposed Square Footage of the Master Plan Buildings 327,363 square feet (net) Total Square Footage at full Master Plan implementation 660,355 square feet Proposed Floor Area Ratio .50 to 1 The 327,363 square -foot total for the proposed HMNMH Master Plan buildings is comprised of the following: Inpatient Building A (IBA) 125,363 square feet Medical Office Building 1 (MOB 1) 80,000 square feet Medical Office Building 2 (MOB 2) 60,000 square feet Medical Office Building 3 (MOB 3) 60,000 square feet Central Plant 10,000 square feet Foundation Building (to be demolished) (8,000 square feet) The City's Land Use Element of the General Plan describes floor area ratio as follows: "Nonresidential land use intensity standards are expressed in terms of floor area ratios (FARs). FARs are used to describe the maximum building intensity for the commercial and industrial categories of land use. A floor area ratio is the ratio of building floor area to the total land area of the lot. For example, suppose a two-story building with a total floor area of 25,000 square feet is situated on a lot with an area of 50,000 square feet. In this instance, the floor area ratio is .5, or the building total floor area is half that of the lot. " (Page L-38 of the City of Santa Clarita General Plan, Land Use Element) The City's Unified Development Code further defines floor area ratio and provides specific direction for development areas that should not be factored into the calculation. The definition reads as follows: "Floor area ratio" shall mean the ratio of floor area to lot area. Indoor recreational facilities, parking structures, subterranean and semi -subterranean garage areas shall be excluded from this ratio. (Page DC -100 of the City of Santa Clarita Unified Development Code) For this reason, the square footage of the proposed parking structures for the HMNMH Master Plan project were not factored into the calculation of floor area ratio. However, because this has been a point of confusion raised at the June and July 2007 City Council meetings, the square footage calculations are provided below for the Council's information. Parking Structure 1 (with one subterranean level) 279,000 square feet Parking Structure 2 (with one subterranean level) 200,334 square feet Parking Structure 3 (with one subterranean level) 92,421 square feet Parking Structure 4 (with two subterranean levels) 85,000 square feet Total Parking Structure Square Footage 656,755 square feet Of the four proposed buildings, one building will have a subterranean level (Inpatient Building A). Of the four proposed parking structures, all structures will have at least one subterranean level. The square footage calculations for the subterranean portions of the building/structures are as follows: Inpatient Building A 23,594 square feet Parking Structure 1 49,500 square feet Parking Structure 2 22,500 square feet Parking Structure 3 32,000 square feet Parking Structure 4 85,000 square feet Subtotal of Subterranean Building Square Footage 23,594 square feet Subtotal of Subterranean Parking Structure Square Footage 189,000 square feet Total Subterranean Square Footage 212,594 square feet Proposed Campus Facilities Specifically, the project request before the City Council includes the following hospital, medical office, ancillary building and parking facilities. Also, the information provided in bulleted format below each facility reflect the project modifications that have been made per Council direction from the June and July 2007 City Council meetings. New Hospital & Medical Office Buildings INPATIENT BUILDING A - A five -story (plus basement), 125,363 square -foot, 120 -bed inpatient hospital building located in the central portion of the campus. This building will be 85 feet in height to the top of the parapet and 100 feet in height to the top of the wind sock and elevator shaft. This building will also include a rooftop helipad. • A healing garden will be designed and constructed as part of Inpatient Building A, to include a water feature. The project conditions of approval will include a condition requiring this outside amenity for patients, visitors and employees. 2. MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 1 - A three-story, 80,000 square -foot medical office building (MOB 1) along the McBean Parkway frontage, east of the main hospital entrance from McBean Parkway. This building will be 45.5 feet in height to the top of the parapet and 51.5 feet to the top of the screen and roof access. • MOB 1 was relocated from the main hospital campus entry at McBean Parkway and Orchard Village Road and placed mid -block, adjacent to Parking Structure 1. This modification was made to reduce the massing of the hospital campus facilities at the McBean Parkway/Orchard Village Road entry.. This modification will allow for additional greenery to be provided adjacent to the main hospital driveway, creating a more attractive appearance from both McBean Parkway and Orchard Village Road. • A more prominent cornice was added to the roofline of MOB I to provide additional architectural enhancement to the building fagades. This further reinforces the Valencia -style architecture of the community on the hospital campus. • MOB 1 is now located immediately adjacent to Parking Structure 1, providing a more convenient and direct pedestrian access between the two facilities. The elevator and stairwell for Parking Structure 1 would be located in the northwest comer of the structure and provide access to a designated pedestrian path that crosses a drive aisle and extends to the eastern and northern building entries. 3. MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 2 - A three-story, 60,000 square -foot medical office building (MOB 2) along the western portion of the campus along the existing ring road. This building will be 45.5 feei to the top of the parapet and 51.5 feet to the top of the screen and roof access. • MOB 2 was shifted from the far western edge of the campus, closer to the existing two-story medical office building located along McBean Parkway at the campus entrance. • A covered pedestrian trellis feature will be provided between MOB 2 and the existing two-story medical office building located immediately east of MOB 2. This feature will provide an aesthetic enhancement along the McBean Parkway corridor and provide a clear pedestrian connection between the two buildings. • Shifting MOB 2 further to the east increases the distance between MOB 2 and residences within the Village Homes North neighborhood to 178 feet at the southwest corner and 165.5 feet at the northwest toner of the building. This also creates additional space for more landscaping to be planted to further buffer the campus facilities from the adjacent homes. 4. MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 3 - A three-story, 60,000 square -foot medical office building (MOB 3) along the westerly portion of the site along the existing ring road. This building will be 45.5 feet to the top of the parapet and 51.5 feet to the top of the screen and roof access. This building is located 97 feet from the western property line. • A pedestrian plaza area to provide a clear path of travel between MOB 3 with the adjacent Parking Structure 2 and Parking Structure 3 will be provided. This will include a trellis feature and other pedestrian amenities to aesthetically enhance the area and soften the massing of PS 2 and PS 3. Parking Structures 1. PARKING STRUCTURE I - A six -level (five levels above ground with one subterranean level), 750 -space parking structure (PS 1) along the McBean Parkway frontage at Avenida Navarre. The parking structure height will be 47 feet to the top of the parapet, 49.5 feet to the top of the parking lot lights, and 60.5 feet to the top of the wind sock. This parking structure will also include a rooftop helipad. • A decorative ironwork design has been added to all structure facades to allow vine growth up the sides of the parking structure. This will increase the landscaped screening of the structure from McBean Parkway. The added design element will also provide an aesthetic enhancement to the campus facilities. 2. PARKING STRUCTURE 2 - A six -level (five levels above ground with one subterranean level), 579 -space parking structure (PS 2) in the northwestern portion of the campus. The parking structure height will be 47 feet to the top of the parapet and 49.5 feet to the top of the parking lot lights. A solid wall along the western fagade'of the parking structure will be provided prior to construction of Parking Structure 3. Parking Structure 3 will connect directly to Parking Structure 2. 3. PARKING STRUCTURE 3 - A four -level (three levels above ground with one subterranean level), 278 -space parking structure (PS 3) in the northwestern comer of the campus. The parking structure height will be 27 feet to the top of the parapet, and 30 feet to the top of the parking lot lights. A solid wall along the western facade of the parking structure will be provided. This parking structure will have a minimum setback of 75 feet from the westerly property line. 4. PARKING STRUCTURE 4 - A three-level (surface parking plus two subterranean levels), 310 -space parking structure (PS 4) to be located along McBean Parkway just east of the main campus entry. The parking structure would be fully subterranean, with at -grade parking at the top level of the structure and an elevator/stairwell projection for pedestrian access at the surface. Integrated planters would be provided throughout the surface parking field. • Initially, the area proposed for Parking Structure 4 will be improved as a 56- space surface parking lot as part of the construction of Medical Office Building 1. The construction of Parking Structure 4 would occur as part of the future Master Plan improvements to meet on-site parking requirements. • The redesign of PS 4 is the most significant modification to the master plan as it changes a 2.5 -level above -grade parking structure to a fully subterranean structure with no visual impact. • The provision of integrated planters with trees and shrubs on the surface of the parking structure will help to provide landscape screening and an aesthetic enhancement along the McBean Parkway corridor. • The community holiday tree, currently located at the eastern side of the main hospital entry, will be retained in the short term with the construction of the 56 -space surface parking lot. With the construction of Parking Structure 4, however, the community holiday tree would be removed. The HMNMH has proposed an alternative location for a community holiday tree at the center roundabout median at the main hospital building. The plans indicate two possible locations for a tree in this space. In this way, the community holiday tree will continue to be accessible for community events and provide a focal point when entering the campus at the main driveway. Other HMNMH Campus Modifications 1. The reconfiguration of 9,770 square feet of current administration space in the existing hospital building to accommodate 20 intensive care unit hospital beds. These hospital administrative functions will move to Medical Office Building 1; 2. The demolition of the 8,000 square -foot Foundation building to accommodate Medical Office Building 3; 3. A 26 -foot -high, 10,000 square -foot central plant facility to be located just east of Inpatient Building A and immediately adjacent to the facilities building; and 4. The elimination and reconfiguration of surface parking spaces. A total of 241 on-site surface parking spaces will be provided, which includes 48 physician spaces and seven emergency room spaces. 5. The excavation and exportation of up to 96,000 cubic yards of dirt over the life of the project. On-site Campus Parking Existing on-site, surface parking spaces on the HMNMH campus total 972 parking spaces. As part of the Conditions of Approval, the project is required to provide the appropriate number of on-site parking spaces per the specifications of the Unified Development Code for hospital space and medical office space. This will be accomplished with some surface parking (241 spaces) and the construction of four parking structures, as listed above. The first 750 -space parking structure will be located along McBean Parkway. Parking Structures 2 and 3 will be located in the northwestern portion of the campus and will provide a maximum of 857 parking spaces. Parking Structure 4 would provide 310 spaces. Required on-site parking is 2,152 spaces. With full project implementation, 2,158 on-site parking spaces will be provided, to include 76 handicapped parking spaces. Therefore, the project provides the required number of on-site parking spaces. At the present time, the applicant has not requested that the parking structures be gated, which would require approval of a Minor Use Permit. McBean Parkway Realignment Alternative During the public hearing process, there have been concerns raised about the traffic impacts at the intersection of McBean Parkway and Orchard Village Road. As identified in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project, there is a need to improve the traffic flow through the intersection which can be remedied with the addition of a right -turn lane from eastbound McBean Parkway to Orchard Village Road. This improvement requires additional right-of-way along McBean Parkway. At the June 12, 2007, City Council meeting, staff was directed to explore additional engineering options to increase the McBean Parkway right-of-way for this improvement, without having to affect the existing single-family residences at the southwest corner of the intersection. Public Works staff conducted a preliminary analysis which concluded that, if the proposed medical office buildings and parking structures along McBean Parkway were moved further to the north to maximize the setback, McBean Parkway could be realigned to create space on the southern side for a right -turn pocket onto Orchard Village Road. This improvement would also require that the radius curve on McBean Parkway be reduced and HMNMH/G&L dedicate up to 12 additional feet on their respective properties. In addition to providing a right -turn pocket that will improve traffic flow through the intersection, this realignment will also allow for increased lane width at the far southern lane of McBean Parkway where westbound transit buses currently stop and block traffic. This additional space will allow buses to pull to the far side of the lane when loading and unloading passengers, and still allow vehicles to pass to the left of the bus. City Planning and Traffic Engineering staff continue to explore this option with the applicant's engineer. It should be noted that this realignment would require the removal of most of the McBean Parkway median trees and additional street trees along the project frontage. This is reflected in Master Plan exhibits provided to the City Council in preparation for tonight's City Council meeting. Additional technical and environmental analysis of this roadway realignment alternative is warranted and will be incorporated into the CEQA documentation for the HMNMH Master Plan. It is important to note, however, that the identification of a technically viable alternative to the augmentation of McBean Parkway eliminates any discussion of eminent domain on the existing residential properties. Entitlements Requested The three entitlements requested by the applicant are described below. A Master Plan is requested for the approval of a series of improvements on the HMNMH campus. The applicant, Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital and G&L Realty, propose a master plan to guide future development of the campus facilities. Approval of Master Plan 04-022 would allow the construction of the following facilities: one six -level inpatient building (five levels above ground); three three-story medical office buildings; four multi-level parking structures (one structure to be fully subterranean with surface parking); reconfiguration of existing hospital space for 20 intensive care unit beds; the demolition of the 8,000 square -foot Foundation building; construction of a central plant facility and two helipads; and the removal of surface parking. A more detailed description of the proposed facilities is provided earlier in this agenda report. 2. A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow specific buildings and parking structures to exceed 35 feet in height. Specifically, Medical Office Buildings 1, 2 & 3 would be 45.5 feet to the top of the parapet and 51.5 feet to the top of the screen and roof access. Inpatient Building A would be 85 feet to the top of the parapet and 100 feet to the top of the helipad wind sock and elevator shaft. Parking Structure 1 would be 47 feet in height at the top of the parapet, 49.5 feet to the top of the parking lot lights, and 60.5 feet in height at the top of the helipad wind sock. Parking Structure 2 would range from 47 feet at the top of the parapet to 49.5 feet at the top of the parking lot lights. The Central Plant, Parking Structure 3 and Parking Structure 4 would be below the 35' height limit and would not be considered as part of the Conditional Use Permit. 3. A Development Agreement is requested to allow for a maximum 15 -year implementation period for the Master Plan. The Development Agreement request was denied by the Planning Commission on February 6, 2007, and this action is now on appeal to the City Council. A revised Development Agreement is currently being negotiated based on direction received from the City Council at the June and July 2007 City Council meetings. Smart Growth SCV Meeting At the June and July 2007 Council meetings, the City Council directed that a facilitated meeting between Smart Growth SCV and the HMNMH/G&L team be held to discuss issues associated with the HMNMH Master Plan project. On July 19, 2007, representatives from the HMNMH / G&L Realty team, members of Smart Growth SCV, and City staff participated in a meeting which was facilitated by Assistant City Manager Ken Striplin. At the meeting, the group discussed a number of issues related to the project. Both parties had an opportunity to ask questions and discuss issues in an informal setting. While there was no agreement reached on a project or project alternative, the two parties were able to share information. CEQA Analysis & Timeline As described previously in this agenda report, a number of physical modifications have been made to the site plan for the HMNMH Master Plan, many of which address the community and Council's concerns and reduce specific environmental impacts identified in the Draft Final Environmental Impact Report. However, the placement of subterranean parking structures on-site and the consideration of new roadway improvement alternatives to improve traffic warrant review in accordance with CEQA. Staff has determined that it is appropriate to revise the CEQA document and recirculate it for a 30 -day review period prior to returning to the City Council for further consideration. All environmental questions or issues submitted during the 30 -day review period will be responded to in writing and incorporated into a revised Draft Final Environmental Impact Report for the City Council's consideration. Specifically, staff plans to circulate the revised EIR during the month of October, starting on or around October 2, 2007. This will allow time to prepare responses to comments and assemble the full Draft Final EIR for the Council's consideration in late November 2007. Responses to Issues & Questions During the June 12, June 26 and July 10, 2007, City Council meetings, a number of questions and issues were raised by City Councilmembers and the public. Attached to this agenda report is a set of documentation with responses to these issues and questions. An index with the date, author, recipient and subject matter of each document is provided for your reference. Please note that issues that were raised at the meeting and fully addressed during the City Council meeting are not included in this document, as they are part of the public record. Also, statements of opinion reflect the viewpoint of the speaker and have not been responded to in the documentation. City Council Policy Issues As the City moves forward in the consideration of this project, the City Council has two key land use policy decisions to make. It is important to remember that the Council will need to also take into consideration the public health and welfare aspects of an expanded hospital campus with enhanced medical services. Below is a brief discussion of these land use policy issues: 1. Does the City have infrastructure capacity to accommodate the proposed HMNMH Master Plan, as modified? The technical and environmental studies conducted for the project to date show that, with the application of mitigation measures, the City's infrastructure, with the exception of two roadway intersections, is sufficient to meet increased demand resulting from Master Plan implementation. Recent studies have determined that a McBean Parkway realignment is possible to create an additional right -tum lane onto Orchard Village Road from eastbound McBean Parkway. This would solve the traffic congestion problems at the McBean Parkway/Orchard Village Road intersection. With this viable roadway improvement now identified, any consideration of eminent domain on existing single-family homes is eliminated. However, the McBean Parkway realignment, too, results in environmental impacts of its own as the majority of the existing McBean Parkway median trees and additional street trees along the HMNMH frontage would be removed. The City Council will need to weigh the traffic -related benefits of the expanded right-of-way along McBean Parkway with the adverse visual impacts of removing mature vegetation along this prominent roadway corridor. 2. Can the City support the project density and massing and the overall impact on the character of the community? As a result of community input, and City Council and staff direction, this project has been modified and reduced significantly. Changes include square footage and building massing reductions, increased setbacks and stepbacks, building relocations and reduced height. The Master Plan, as revised, contains four buildings, three of which do not exceed three stories in height. The five -story OSHPD building is centrally located within the hospital campus and surrounded by other buildings to the south, west and east, a landscaping slope to the north. Parking Structure 4, once proposed to be four levels above ground, has been redesigned as a two-level subterranean structure with surface parking to reduce the massing along the McBean Parkway corridor. Enhanced architecture will be applied to all buildings and parking structures on the campus, as illustrated on the elevations for Medical Office Building 1 and Parking Structure 1. Decorative lattice on each facade of Parking Structure I will allow for vines to grow and screen the structure from McBean Parkway. The conceptual landscape plan includes enhanced landscaping which focuses on the hospital campus perimeter to reduce visual impacts to surrounding land uses. McBean Parkway, from Interstate 5 to Valencia Boulevard, is a mixed use corridor. Neighborhood shopping centers, a four-year university, churches, assisted living, single-family homes, multi -family complexes and offices are among these uses. Each use is integral to the Valencia community and contributes to its character. The HMNMH Master Plan has been redesigned to be more compatible with these land uses, both in terms of density as well as architectural character. However, this project will have a visual impact on the surrounding community. Ultimately, the City Council will need to make a formal policy decision as to whether the community health care benefits from this project, combined with the project revisions, mitigation measures and conditions of approval, are sufficient to support the density and massing of the HMNMH Master Plan. Council Direction & Next Steps Staff requests that the City Council provide input to staff regarding the revisions to the HMNMH Master Plan and continue the public hearing to the September 25, 2007, City Council meeting for a focused discussion on the proposed Development Agreement. Concurrently, staff will begin the revisions to the EIR, based on the HMNMH Master Plan presented at tonight's public hearing, in preparation for the October 2007 recirculation. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Direct staff to prepare documentation to deny the request for the revised HMNMH Master Plan and uphold the Planning Commission's denial of the proposed Development Agreement. 2. Request modifications to the HMNMH Master Plan proposal. 3. Any other action as determined by the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT No direct fiscal impacts, either positive or negative, to the City's General Fund are anticipated at this time. However, the proposal is anticipated to generate 385 new permanent jobs in the City of Santa Clarita. ATTACHMENTS Responses to June & July 2007 Issues - Index of Documentation HMNMH Master Plan - Exhibits Booklet - available in City Clerk's Reading File NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF SANTA CLARITA CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, at its regular meeting held July 10, 2007, continued a public hearing on ITEM 17 Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital and G&L Realty 23845 through 23929 McBean Parkway within the community of Valencia in the City of Santa Clarita MASTER CASE NUMBER MC 04-325 Master Plan/Conditional Use Permit 04-022 Development Agreement 06-001 A Master Plan and Conditional Use Permit are requested for the approval of a series of improvements on the HMNMH campus. The applicant, Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital and G&L Realty, propose a master plan to guide future development of the campus facilities. Approval of Master Plan 04-022 would allow the construction of the following facilities: one six -level inpatient building (five levels above ground); three three- story medical office buildings; four multi-level parking structures; reconfiguration of existing hospital space for 20 intensive care unit beds; the demolition of the 8,000 square -foot Foundation building; construction of a central plant facility and two helipads; and the removal of surface parking. A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow specific buildings and parking structures to exceed 35 feet in height. A Development Agreement is also requested by the applicant. To August 28, 2007. The continued public hearing will be held at or after 6:00 p:m. in the Council Chamber at 23920 Valencia Blvd., Santa Clarita, California. (0',, Dated this 1 Ith day of July, 2007. SHARON L. DAWSON, CITY CLERK *�****.r****►r**gra*ss+«**»tw*�***sts*rt****.•**�*�.s*s**.+*�*«*. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING CITY OF SANTA CLARITA 1 SHARON L. DAWSON, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that she is the duly appointed and qualified City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita and that on July 11, 2007, she caused the above notice to be posted at the door of the Council Chamber located at 23920 Valencia Blvd., Santa Clarita, California. SHARON L. DAWSON, CITY CLERK Santa Clarita, California PubHrg/contph.doc NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF SANTA CLARITA CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, at its regular meeting held August 28, 2007, continued a public hearing on ITEM 18 Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital and G&L Realty 23845 through 23929 McBean Parkway within the community of Valencia in the City of Santa Clarita MASTER CASE NUMBER MC 04-325 Master Plan/Conditional Use Permit 04-022 Development Agreement 06-001 A Master Plan and Conditional Use Permit are requested for the approval of a series of improvements on the HMNMH campus. The applicant, Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital and G&L Realty, propose a master plan to guide future development of the campus facilities. Approval of Master Plan 04-022 would allow the construction of the following facilities: one six -level inpatient building (five levels above ground); three three- story medical office buildings; four multi-level parking structures; reconfiguration of existing hospital space for 20 intensive care unit beds; the demolition of the 8,000 square -foot Foundation building; construction of a central plant facility and two helipads; and the removal of surface parking. A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow specific buildings and parking structures to exceed 35 feet in height. A Development Agreement is also requested by the applicant. To September 25, 2007. The continued public hearing will be held at or after 6:00 pm in the Council Chamber at 23920 Valencia Blvd., Santa Clarita, California. Dated this 29th day of August, 2007. SHARON L. DAWSON, CITY CLERK .**�*�•s*�***.***ss«s..«...s*+**t►**�*rss**.*r*■a*�«s....rts�•s*. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) SHARON L. DAWSON, being first duly swum; deposes and says that she is the duly appointed and qualified City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita and that on August 29, 2007, she caused the above notice to be posted at the door of the Council Chamber located at 23920 Valencia Blvd., Santa Clarita, California. SHARON L. DAWSON, CITY CLERK Santa Clarita, California PubHrg/contph.doc HMNMH MASTER PLAN PROJECT RESPONSES TO THE ISSUES & QUESTIONS RAISED AT THE JUNE 2007 & JULY 2007 CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS INDEX OF DOCUMENTATION AUGUST 16, 2007 Per the request of the City Council, staff has assembled a comprehensive set of responses to the issues and questions raised at the June and July 2007 City Council meetings regarding the proposed Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital Master Plan. These documents are being provided in advance of the August 28, 2007, City Council meeting to allow ample time for the City Council and the public to review these documents. All documents and attachments listed below will be available for public review on the City's website by 5:00 PM on Friday, August 17, 2007. Please note that the below documents are organized chronologically. Undated documents were placed at the end of the list. 1. June 11, 2007, Letter from HMNMH to Paul Brotzman, Community Development Director, City of Santa Clarita, regarding the Centers of Excellence — Definition & Need 2. June 20, 2007, Memorandum from Joseph Montes, Assistant City Attorney, to Mayor McLean and Councilmembers regarding the Response to questions raised at the June 12, 2007, City Council meeting regarding the HMNMH Master Plan 3. July 6, 2007, Letter from Mayor Marsha McLean to David Gauny, Smart Growth SCV, regarding the Response to June 19, 2007, letter submitted by Smart Growth SCV Regarding a Transcript from the June 12, 2007, City Council meeting for the proposed Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital Master Plan Project (with attachment) 4. July 20, 2007, Memorandum from Kenneth R. Pulskamp, City Manager, to Mayor McLean and Members of the City Council regarding The Grant Deed and L.A. County Planning Files Related to the Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital (HMNMH) (with attachments) 5. July 23, 2007, Memorandum from Kenneth R. Pulskamp, City Manager, to Mayor McLean and Members of the City Council regarding City of Santa Clarita Discretionary Approvals Related to the Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital (HMNMH) (with attachments) 6. July 31, 2007, Memorandum from Kenneth R. Pulskamp, City Manager, to Mayor McLean and Members of the City Council regarding Information Request Related to Floor Area Ratio Calculations for the Proposed Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital Master Plan Project HMNMH Master Plan — Response to Issues & Questions Index of Documentation Page 2 7. August 15, 2007, Memorandum from Joseph Montes, Assistant City Attorney, to Mayor McLean and City Council Members regarding Response to February S, 2007, SCOPE Letter (with attachment) 8. August 16, 2007, Memorandum from Kenneth R. Pulskamp, City Manager, to Mayor McLean and Members of the City Council regarding Response to Issues & Questions Regarding the Development Agreement Proposed for the Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital (HMNMH) Master Plan Project 9. August 16, 2007, Memorandum from Kenneth R. Pulskamp, City Manager, to Mayor McLean and Members of the City Council regarding the Response to Issues & Questions Regarding the Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital (HMNMH) Master Plan Project 10. August 16, 2007, Memorandum from Kenneth R. Pulskamp, City Manager, to Mayor McLean and Members of the City Council regarding City Staff Evaluation of Hospital Campuses in the Los Angeles Area (with attachments) 11. August 16, 2007, Memorandum from Kenneth R. Pulskamp, City Manager, to Mayor McLean and Members of the City Council regarding Staff Responses to Letter from David Gauny, Smart Growth SCT , dated July 10, 2007 Regarding the HMNMH Master Plan Project (with attachments) 12. August 16, 2007, Letter from Roger Seaver, CEO, Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital, to Mayor McLean and Members of the City Council regarding the Response to City Council Questions 13. August 16, 2007, Letter from Stephen Wen, AIA, Senior Principal, SWA Architects to Mayor McLean and Members of the City Council regarding HMNMH Master Plan — Response to City Council Questions 14. August 16, 2007, Kurt Salmon Associates, Master Facility Plan Review, City Council Questions & Answers prepared for the City of Santa Clarita 15. August 16, 2007, Memorandum from Collette Morse, RBF Consulting, to Paul Brotzman, Community Development Director, regarding Responses to July 10 2007, City Council Questions Regarding the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital Master Plan Project 16. August 16, 2007, Memorandum from Collette Morse, RBF Consulting, to Paul Brotzman, Community Development Director, regarding Responses to June 11, 2007, SCOPE Letter (with attachment) HMNMH Master Plan — Response to Issues & Questions Index of Documentation Page 3 17. August 16, 2007, Memorandum from Collette Morse, RBF Consulting, to Paul Brotzman, Community Development Director, regarding Responses to July 9, 2007, SCOPE Letter (with attachment) 18. HMNMH Cover Page with articles attached titled Hospital Cost of Construction, Recent Articles LMH S:\cd\current\04-325\City Council Staff ReportsUndex of August 28, 2007, attachments.doc Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital Master Plan - Exhibits Booklet Dated August 15, 2007 (There is only 1 hard copy of this booklet, therefore, the hard copy will be filed with the agenda packet containing the item for this public hearing when it is closed.) MOUSE IgogmAll W W 2 �NN L1. w 0 W W U) x W Z z U cn W U W O w CL U W W 2 2 Z z z W O LU Q Q Q < Y > W Z W I- Z }=-QQ W z W U U Q V W F- a.F- J Z ad Lu W CL wZ �g� z�2 QQLU �co LuZ U Z Z z of W a.Q Q Y Y W W c7 cr LU J w of 3: 3: n- LLI Q a. J d Q o Q W QQ W W W (L Of z� a-a-o�0 a. W W >> a.(.) LU (%ZZJCLz a xm(nZ U(nZQ CO (n W W W=) — O a 0¢» azw� m® �EDED0zW i U Y Z Z U U Y c2 Q g mU �° � L 022 Q N J Q= QQz_Qwwzz JJmQa. 00 zcd2NUQ g� a w J J W w--< D z z LL W W E E CO M F g(n zUzm�XF-F-=) Q wwoio (n Z Q< a Wa. W W W F -a. w () W w u�'i Z m 0 co cw Lu Om M 7o °o°LU D�cwn(iii���0Zw� » :c - I za(s m(nwo»¢Qzomm uj JBz Yz Xg0MCLMa000F-F®(n» �WWJ � �g F-(nWOmmZZUue ZF-F-WW»w►�(n CL o aUU�®�mJJ—wwzz9=F—�J® zwzzzz�ZZ:D=) oafn(no W L C3 �("ga�aWgaF-F°zz�wwwwU) U)¢:D wCL ZW W W W-�wWLLIWa¢W0'WaMJJW WUF- r F- F- F- F- F- F- a F- F- F- F- w w p w 0 WDWWWW¢WWWrLaOOW=000(n( WW:5wo 2w2 �2¢�2ZZ2�F-H�g�an ( M M10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 B I I l —'C-4 CO tACflRBDOOr-NMqt000h0000c-NMd"tl9 a O Y NE �I LU cv�c �ro �i� c�3 3> c a3y SMm R° c w oNtymanm 32 m i `�agye ay o °w�5 y.r a 00. .� c ®-�p®,w aO o 5. 9 m c N E 2' 3 N '+>- `g `o o t c g .may, y Q A$ H^ e y y> t c w of vY a 2 0 aE�i y H a E M N$ E g -4 O E E y o g3aaa U� y— ° EcEL a�33a dCD H. ws §cQ <2 Eo�,cy°e ° w m at ° w m 3 E F- ° wF v0 8E 2z —a St E is o m~ c �i H 3 y y H E d m rc vi o ° :^ i. > O y m o Nw�y ��Mogf �m C.O ®.0 rL dO ®O ° `e F 3 t q CMCc t_t ° �p ® 2®'e�Noly�:pr�Ew C¢ �MCg Q+ + yw 6 0w a = o S2 7 O E e w y N a O W .Q a M O. N W yEa o 'o 8:F 3: >'�% � o� '° ._ 6'wc oU 0 w�c� >8m= a�a£a 'A0 o n 0`� pysM CN; 'oea 'Ccg3 0;'-Z- 9ME,®rQ CAL a O yO `C %Oa L��y ®�� y y r r r > o' c y E o d E o c v « c c Z e a f M>«$ c :8 o w as '£o$ 2�y� m�' 10 `l °OC v me a 'm$°=®>®2 «V 3 N m O t . E _ O L _ SSC, !�y 'Q L C E t3 S2 a m £' Q` �6 s 6 m mmm yCL ay a m ° r H X e p2�� y L„; C •'� C. f� c N t E L N L 9 L® en e E O Mg e ¢ O W« Q Q C Q ¢ O A Ly+ (Qf y F- Q E e p..� -C�r M O tT5 gt)p 'O IV C ®. (A fA $ t0 a f0 G [J t0 fV M 'i 5 US a O LU U W t80 N d C > O C ro G 4)to _ M H r 'O S N d ••y {Ep G L" '� O W a r®® a o a Ea o 2� y« � M o o0 Efir o�`- a® za fid2'b a £� �a wd� ���i w�o y4'�6.. m mNE�«w ycnE m�n°na �� g' o� .Ze EES om ��.Qe ' SwE 3�e a3o 3 42 pC� "w' �.O r y9 0 C c C y O d 0 w0 E E c=0 N m y® O R C YZe; O a G a o h« oT EMS E c`� P>� .��L Nye co£®. .eEo y am p E(L 68 mQE F N m6� aha E o� a Em m�ym� �gOy �rm u> y'c c�v cO dgo� esy �� U ^sYgsoGFa 1Z Q O°�d9���C� yF� aa 7W C �2 . a Oy t32 m® s 3Eayi E_ E�=E E z' C ° �OE4yt gL) ey a °1° i°�= E3 `� E3= cy ® 2 4�2 � yU ®.z .5 'a _ ��� m oc ryas $2:9 � cc @�wg f0 h y t y mm! E« c `0 1 a y «c� e rn c c® E �' 0 0 > Q S S a LU S2 cc I j �2 E 0 C� d '.0° ® yh w�°U 20 ® m J W 0 �%`8 $ Ea 8° G L �_�� Q`� a « § � �dy >Ezs� ® Co QE�yy C L G o a O 'EN :§ p y� L � `^e L o wo to 8 O �� O X91 O F• .+s_ ry 2+r W U y 4 o a am 46 ww 9 O° y A �® z c ae9 E>°c(s � V E dmE ''6O �'� e'=O`o 6' t �v'-.3wca m CV W N m e 08 y W 6" A 9] .0.� 'e O O .c O _ _.+ f m iy t °0' U a U _�° G c -S o ec 5w� vim x N w « acE .yc�c 3: W �' w � o mcg d am— �•a�i 5R3 Z 7 0 F .� -° K 'E cv ° E iS r ds d y'9 T c .: 2 rc Ur 8 aoiaa = «®c w� «xed «xc a �Sw () z .� ¢o.°� Q®" ¢=y a �N° 3 L'w °" yE y� '6 U ` p d y m ._ o M o d ¢ =? 0 Q wo Q y ¢ y m ¢ s+ ,� Q W m �- f0 p CV L M rL « l0 V 0 z R M z �- 6 L N Q ®. J U U <z LI 0. 0�y �> q Ick Q x k ) k ■ ■ � � IL 41 LU � � ) § k #\ )) f# � «@ U) /# ! ■| � )k §LU !| � �j j) k )2 7 a0 2 @)| \ �!k / %|c U) % § ) LU k k ��k 2 �)\ § 2)§ s ;§!; w k of ; «®! ) zw «»�« § 6k;§ g bE�f 0.5 ƒ LU IL cn ( ) co �mk / /k) LU i ^ (km(D .=e ®/! { » tea= 6§|§; z |� e } .= E U .. . ......... . .......... N,N\ - - - - - - - - - - 1 4 CLQU U) 1% " " FN " pi A A A " ass R #% " A A " j* A " " " 9% " " FM . . . . 9 s� \ � J t- s a ld� e � I @ o f n' r 1 f / Irk e / 1 1 I 11 � r+ 11 I 4 I i 11 I yyyyy W !Y JI P e C d w 11 z a r /"i { I ❑7 J U I P I I I II I z I I f jf tJ dd t e r y-ppor s� F— Z LU Z e� W Q a. fY z Q a m C g r N Z J fl rY z LU H � Q \ � J I @ 1 Irk 1 1 I 11 � r+ 11 I 4 i 11 I yyyyy W !Y I� w 11 z a /"i { I ❑7 J U I � I I I II I z I I f tJ !7 r y-ppor 1 a a 4 f 3 f I Ifs Ilf I �E[ II r f { I1 F— Z LU Z e� W Q a. fY z Q a m C g r N Z J fl rY z LU H � Q N- J� W J �I J J WJ uj n (p II 0 1 W 1 N (9 I ul IC� Ur mz m Z - _- Q _- 133 Z© 13A - _ 3 31 LB _ D. I 01 do- I'INGO � \ uj I z I I W _-------- - z < _ I 0. < I -- WP - -I I w Q �l_ _ I CL y I ; I I I III r.. i W J ---W J f • 3���..... J - J W Q it �- -' W Q 9-r N dI N z Z }sr�I' �'�h I� 4 EL •II�� Q IL CIDU` , i r — ' 'I m I 0 7idns W Le IN uj ``... 01 co ; Y Z ,I k� U a�0 ' �� IF LL 1 , z e z Xbu , I tP i, DN -- ___ i _... l CL LU t.�.,....•......'� r U) f n" n bra m pq ft n"^ m ^ n n" ,AA LU m ua t L �R® Q aha F- IX O 0 ■ yL ƒ _ � 0 0 �I 5 y 1 � L i— Q {1 g W z — Q o a. Z w� .5 0-i it a A a a a a m a a a a 0 m 0 m a m m a a is m m w a a m 19 I 0 M y _ . 6 n !� 8 2 2 « CL & IL \ U) 0 2 « a k f _ L k \ U § & 4! k � 2 !! of _ )| 9 |§ �9 L x E . & J 2 n u 's a c S "E m V E Q Eu yy n Ti U 4 3 R � T E 7 o � Y q d Q J 4 1 �9 L x E . & J 2 n u Q49 a m w a m r m S m m rft ®_m m m r>>' m m _',_re m s,»ems m s m F - z w 2 z c� J a a Y d z Q w OD v z F- CO VJ X w 2 w�/ Ix w w 's a "E K� ® a U U U W Q49 a m w a m r m S m m rft ®_m m m r>>' m m _',_re m s,»ems m s m F - z w 2 z c� J a a Y d z Q w OD v z F- CO VJ X w 2 w�/ Ix w w e� L e / 9 � 8 f w / Y 1 a i e� L e E g E E g — v E E y E a E `p E m U V U w / � 8 f w / r / a i E g E E g — v E E y E a E `p E m U V U w §i \: 6/ 2§ \:r §§ w!u\ \) \ \ \ ( \ ON S / 6 LU§ q � / a ƒ d \ 2 -Iy j. J. ji .......... .......... . ........... ..... ..... .......... -Iy \�) \ \ 0 I � 0 _ LL 3: \ \ \ \ C� i 0 2 d § k } 0 ti OF O W? s z z z Q Wi J w F to LU 2 J VJ z O Q w J w a- e >:� m <m m ><m m - IS of sale m ', e! le_ 2 $I 6 II wP �I m I � I � SII d 2 J VJ z O Q w J w a- e >:� m <m m ><m m - IS of sale m ', e! le_ ®« .»j< 2 �� � ........... \xm. : ■ � nm:Y/ w�X ex 0 r E ` y • 6'M1 i Y4� yR rp :', �1 nm:Y/ w�X 0 E �1 eJ r t . f i f i .. i YG f f f J uj