Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-07-14 - AGENDA REPORTS - FOUR 45 FOOT COMMUTER BUSES (2)CONSENT CALENDAR DATE: SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: Agenda Item: /9 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA AGENDA REPORT City Manager Approval: Item to be presented by: July 14, 2009 Darren Hernandez ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT WITH YOLO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT AND CONTRACT WITH MOTOR COACH INDUSTRIES FOR THE PURCHASE OF FOUR, 45 -FOOT COMMUTER BUSES Administrative Services RECOMMENDED ACTION City Council: Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute an Assignment Agreement with Yolo County Transportation District, waive the formal bid process, and negotiate and execute the contract with Motor Coach Industries (MCI) for the purchase of four, 45 -foot buses, in an amount not to exceed $2,687,761, subject to City Attorney approval. 2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute a Memorandum of Understanding with the Los Angeles County Transportation Authority (Metro) for the acceptance of Proposition 113 Transit Modernization Bridge Funding, in the amount of $1,437,761, to be applied to the purchase of said vehicles. 3. Appropriate $1,437,761 to account 12400-5201.003. Increase the grant revenue account 700-4621.001 by $1,437,761. 4. Approve the carry-over of $1,250,000 from Fiscal Year 2009 budget account 12400-5201.003, and increase grant revenue account 700-4424.009 by $1,000,000 and MOSIP revenue account 700-4422.007 by $250,000. Ap,rflowEu BACKGROUND In order to continue to meet the demand for commuter services to and from the Santa Clarita Valley, the City's Transit Division is in need of four additional 45 -foot commuter buses. Two buses were approved in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2008-09 budget, and up to five additional buses are programmed with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) for replacement in FY 2009-10. If approved by Council, the request herein would permit staff to purchase the two buses provided for in the previous year's budget and purchase two of the five buses planned for replacement this fiscal year. Staff proposes that in lieu of issuing a Request for Proposal (RFP), the City Council approve the Assignment Agreement with Yolo County Transportation District (Yolo). This agreement assigns the City the rights under the option provision of Yolo's existing contract to purchase four commuter buses. Subsequent to this approval, staff recommends approval of a contract with MCI for the manufacture of the buses. By assuming the option of an existing contract, the City realizes considerable time and cost savings. The RFP process, which can consume three to six months, is averted. Additionally, the price paid by the City is based upon the price already negotiated by Yolo as part of a much larger procurement. Staff also conducted a price analysis to ensure the most advantageous offer to the City. The option approach to acquisition is prevalent within the transit industry and is commonly accepted by the Federal Transit Administration. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Direct staff to issue a Request for Proposal for the procurement of four, 45 -foot commuter buses. 2. Other action as determined by the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT There is no impact to the General Fund with this procurement. For two of the four buses, the City has Federal 5307 transit grants programmed to cover 80% of the total contractual cost of the buses, and the remaining twenty percent (20%) required local match will come from MOSIP. The remaining two buses will be funded entirely by the Proposition 1 B grant. The total contract for the manufacture of the buses shall not exceed $2,687,761. ATTACHMENTS Prop 1 B MOU WAM MOU # M0U.1)CQ8SAC'7 ,NIMCIKANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR PROPOSITION 1B TR NS1T MODERNIZATION RNIZATION BRIDGE FUNDING 'Phis Nlemorandun) of Ujiderstanding, liar Proposition 1131 ransit Modernization 13rtd-c l=tlnctin�, (" (� OU") is entered into as of .luly� 1, 2008. by ants Between the !,os Angeles C;ou.11ty Nletropolttkin Tra sportation Atatllority (" LAMI'A") and City of Satlta Clat ita WIL EAS, oil NuYcrllbcr 4. I{. 80, the voters dthc Ct�urlty of Los Angeles approved by majtrrity Proposilinrt }l, ;gin ordinance establishin(; a one-half pment sales tax for public tlalsit purposes, and WHEREAS. ort NoMlkbvr 6, 1990, the votels of the Ceutlty of Los Angcics ;t1p1ovCd hyr ma-iori(y Proposition C,, -an ordinance estahlishing ,1 one-ll�tlrpercent sales tax for public iransit pw poses: ;and NVTTEREAS, LACNITA is the agency responsibic for administering the Proposition A and Prt�Positican C taxes, and WHEREAS. thy:: Starte of California ]las Proposition IB Transit Modernization Program ("Prop I B-) hunds which will he allocated it) I os Angeles COU11t}' ln11111C Pal operators according t(1 the State 1'ratisit Assistance F>_uld (S`fA)lilrrtutla; and WHEREAS, on November 14, 2007, the 1,ACfMTA Boarcl appi-ovcd ll tnotioll for irtCluded turd 0i�,ibIc. Los Atlgcles Cot]Iltyx Municipal operators to receive Prop IB fLmds al the current i,.,oS Angeles County Fonllula Allocation Proggram levels ("FAP Levels'') for c7ch year of tar totat lift; of the bond program. `hherefore, for those rinrnicipal operators whosc State allocation of Prop I B funds is less than the amount such operator would have received using the current FAP Luwls, LACNITA wi11 bridge that },!]l ;x11(1 Pay eligible municipal operators the difforence I)CMCtn ;uth amc>111ltS; W1IFR1sAS, C ily o1-S;lnta Clarita and City or of 1.os Angelk;s Departtmot of"I'mosportatiott lire eli"role nunliclpal operators who did that receive any Prop 1B funds. As part of die Note ulm 14.2007 11101.1011, the LA001 A board authorized the City of Santa Ctanta and the City o[ I_os An- los Department of" 1'raalsporulOil to receive only Bridge lunds based oil the FAP Levels; and INHEIZ AS, I.,ACM I'A 130',Wd dir'tXLed stall to use funds l'i'ons the Prulloslllon C_ 40% or I'rollttisition 11 t)'o l�iscrctio11n1y�C;m�i�tlt o�'e. C1'1 lcG��nr1t (c1r any ct11rr11rital1�1r1) (clic "Fitrld5 to Pay such hri(lge funding; and 1'x'1-TEREAS, LACNII'A and (;ranter t=esiite to agree to the tc:rir.s arsd couditions ol'tllc grant of fun& (lc;cribcd hereill. -3- NOW Tf I I` REFOR F., in considcratton Ortltc III Lit ual LCrna and conditions contained licrcin, LA{`'NITA and Grantee hereby agree as follows; 1.1. This MOU v ill be in cffixt ftom JulV 1, 200N and sltall terminale, Oil .Tune 30, 2009- A RITIC I 009 AR;TICI Y, 2 - AI..I,OCATION OF THR FUNDS AND INVOICE PROCEDURE 2.1. Tu the CXtcrit the Fllnds are available, LACM-r.A shall pay 0—antce one 1111111011 t'oitr hundred thirty seven thousand seven liundrod sixty one dollars (51,437,1,61) (th,- "Bridge Funds") to he used for Grantee's Eligible Pr(�jeets, as defined in Section 3.2 below. 2.?. The Bridge [-;unds will he dishtirsed �ti'tei-ihis MOU has been fidly e"ecut_A tnd Grantee h,is SttbmitLed tea LACNI TA all ol'the lo' llotving: (i) LA(.;MTA's;ipproval of Grautec's allocation rCc7ucst to usw thL Bridgc Funds on Eligible Projects. Lr1C'IVITA will rctilcw the request and approve: only Eligible Projects that meet the nxluirements of Prop i 1'3. A minimal opn,able prglcit scgnactit will only he apprtatiW as au EIT-IbIc Project if the hcnciitS arc su1' 1=111, to inert the goals and objectives of Prop IB: and (thy GULntit; shall dcnionstratc it has the tin{utcial t�,3p:t ity to mainUtin a11d operate each Eligible Project. its well as the lin-tnci<il and in5tituttonal 4bihty to accept tht,[tial liabilities anti ohligatiot-Is ftfr the dttratu}11.01' Gill EIi;IIiblc Pro,lce.L's use -Cul lits; 2.3 f.,AUN,'lTA will dishurse the Bridzge Funds after it re-ceivc% an invoice. from Granter and all rcy�.tircd documentation as provided penin. invoices shill be consistent Nv ith Clic Funding Plan which GratttCC subinii5 to LAC MTA as pati Of its allocation recluest for tla4 Fridge Funds. AR -11(,'1.1~ 3 - USE O FUNDS 3.1 Grantee shall uiilirc the Bridge Funds on State or LAC'MTA approved Uipible Projects in accordance with the terms and conditions Contained licicin and in it niMtirer c0nsistent with the State's Prop [B Guide.finc s including timely use of fimtls, Funds must tie encumbered within throe (3) year's of tlac allocation trite] expended within threie (3) years afic;r eilcumbrancc. 3.'2 '1EIIs,,,Ible i'roaects" arc t'.eiinW as transit cttl)i[a] projects (itrcluclIng it inIniIII Ill] t operable se�),nlcaat of projwt) N�lticit (i) has, one or mom, of Clic follnWitti� purpose: a. RchabilitatiurF, safety. or modernizatioat bulm ►vonlcnts. b. Capital scrvlcc enhancements or i xpanslolls. c. New capital pro_Iects. d. F3us rapid transit improve-rrents. c. Rolling stack procurement, rchabFlitaOon nl replacement; and (ii) has al use fil life not loss than the required useful life for capital alss;as ptrrstrrnt to the State Geacral Obli-htion Bond I,aw, GC Section 107> i (aF); and (iii-) must b:;:,onsistcnt with Grantee's most recently adopted short-range trailsit plan or puhlic,ly aidoptcd plait th,it programs or prioritizes funds for- transit capFtal rurplu"vlrrcnts, including a tl'7rrspol'tatio=t ir3rplor'cwoni prngr,1 of a certified Hoard cndurscim-nit. 3.3, If th4 Funds identified in the Funding Elan which Grantea submits as part Of as allocation regUCSt are insutlic CM to complete the State or I_.AC'Nf'l A approwd F,ligiblc ProICct, (jrantCt: dial] SOCUre and providc its Oren fultdin�g, ncccssaly to com111de the Eligible. Project 4 Grantee shall be responsible Cor ar)y and all cost ovcr7-uns for the State or t-ACM`C.A atpproved ' ligil)le Prcljcet_ ARTICLE 4 - AODIT AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS NTS 4.1 Thi annual audit of the public transportation operators already ruquir cd timicr tiro Tran5portatie►n Dovelopancnt :pct (TDk) put -suint to PLIC 99245 sliall be UP,M) t'd to include. verification ofreccipt and appropriatc expenditure of bone) hinds in alccorchmce Gvith SB, Statutes oC2(}M7. i 4.2 Grnntcc� arn-ces to establish 'MLI n1FFinllin proper accounting procedures and cash m:mag,cmcnt records and documents in accordaurcc with conditions defined I,v this 1140U. Grarl(ce shrill manitaFin all documuras and records related to the Mate or I.AC%•ITA approved Eligible Projects, this 1J1OU and the use of tlrc 13rrd-c Funds ti)r (Ili -cc (3) years alftcr the on() or till- liscarl year In which ilia Bridge Puncls were expended. LACMTA nliiy!)edit, as provided, herein, up to direr; ( ~) years after the end of the fiscal year in which thc: Bridge FL111Lis were LXI)CII cd. )Upon completion of the Slate or T.ACMTA Approved Eligible Projects funded froin N Y 07-tt8 Prop 11`3 Funds arnUor the Bridge Ftindin,, Grantee shall submit a report to LACMTA showing thll and final costs of each Fligible project To the extent excess Bridge Funds romailt, SUCK Bred c. Faulds shall 61. rcturncd to LACMTA, UI) to the ri-flount ofthc Bridge Funds unless allocated to another )tape or LACNITA �pprovcd l lrgrblu Prgjtrct. 4.3 In the event a Slatw or LACMTA approved Fligible Project is cancelled or terminated, all interest- and other income earned by the Bridge Fund IIrola 113 wi11 be returned to LACMTA unless allocated to another StaLe or LACM-1-A approved E-ligible Project. ARTICLE 5 - VIISCELLAM;OUS 3.1 This tn'ant shrill be a crate-timc ora}nt subject to the tours and midilions agreed Lo herein and in the Prep 1 B Goldelrncs. Except ars otherN rse provided in this IMOU, the grant tines not imply nor obligate any 4itturC funding countlitrtlent Ort the part oI' LACNTI'A. 5.2 Gramee underst;ands and avrees that in programming the Funtk and entering into this MOU, LACNITA is acting pursuant to IIS statutory authority and shall have no liuibility itr';0imcction wilh tits use of ncc Bridge Funds on State or LACM CA approved Eligible Projects. Grantee shaill full' indemnify, defend and hold LACMTA, itdiret tmrs, officers. employee and agents harmless li-om and against any liability and expenses, including without limitation, defense: costs, any costs or liability on account of bodity iniury. death or personal injury ofany person or to.- damage ordamage to or lass of risk of property, any environmental obligation, lgarl tee z, attic) any claims for damages ul Ully uattUru w hartsucvcr arising out ofeach Eti,.IJbtu Prnjcrl inclLtding, ww•itltout tirnitattion, (i) any broach of Gra3ntcc's obligations and or this I~��OU; liil misuse of the Britlgc hinds by Gratntcc or its officers, agcttis, employees or subcontractors; (iii) any act or ontission of Gr'antcc or its officers, aucnts, employees, contractors or subcontractors iii the puforrnance and."or provision of the Sralc! or LACNITA approved Eligible Projcci(s). 5.3 Grantee Shall comply with all aplilica blc local, state and iedcral laws and regulations and the Prop 1 B QlidlChllCS in the use of the Brrd re Funds and the it -11 rl4rncntatrorr U the Starts and LACMTA approved tili,gihle Project.s. 5.-1 LACMTA reserves the righL to 1e1-11nir7at4 Ibis NIOU :uld withhold the FLIIldS it -it is dlcturnrincti that CrranLee ha.; nol c:ompliod with all the torts and conditions ct'!ntained herein or ill ilte (.itriddittCS. 5,5 No amenclinent or modific7tiort to this NTOU shall tic bindii-to upon cincct teal Ly unless such amendment or utodrficaEwn is in ,writing duly executed by both \ladies. This MOU shalt not be arnrt;ndcd ormotiified by any acts or crnnduct of the lxn-LreS �_C' t antes is not a contractor, agent or employee of LAC.MTA. GranLCL; shall not represent itself as at contractor, agent or employee of LAC'M-LA anis) shall hale [to poucr- to bind L A('M TA in contract or odionvise. _6 4 5.7 `Mis M(aU and tltc Prole I B GUide illeS con5MuLcs the entire agreevm inL betwCen the paoies mv411 respect to Lhc subject matter of this Agreement anal SUpersedcs al I prior and contomponancous agrcmcats and underst:nulings. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the partics hereto have caused this MOU to be duly Uccuted tis UC the dates below iviill all the lormalitics rer{uirW by law. CITY O1+ SANTA CLARITA LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOUTAN TRANSPOR'T'ATION AUTHORITY Bv: Iti�iine• 'l'itic. 17�t��:• ATTFST: Date: 7 Bv: Rugcr Snoblo CBiel Exccutive Officer Date, APPROVED AS TO F(31 -M: Rti}nnond G. Former. Jr. COUNITY COUNSEL �7-