HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-09-13 - AGENDA REPORTS - NORTH COPPERHILL ANNEX (2)CONSENT CALENDAR
DATE:
SUBJECT:
DEPARTMENT:
Agenda Item: 6_._
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager Approval
Item to be presented by
September 13, 2011
Ben Jarvis
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE FOR
PREZONE 11-001 (MASTER CASE 11 -03 8) FOR THE NORTH
COPPERHILL ANNEXATION AREA
Community Development
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council adopt an Ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PREZONE NO. 11-001
(MASTER CASE 11 -03 8) FOR THE PURPOSES OF ANNEXATION FOR THE NORTH
COPPERHILL ANNEXATION AREA, AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A."
BACKGROUND
On August 23, 2011, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita conducted a public hearing
regarding a Prezone and Annexation for the 2,475 -acre North Copperhill Annexation area. After
closing the public hearing, the Council voted unanimously (5-0) to adopt a Resolution approving
Master Case 11-038, adopting a Negative Declaration, and to direct Staff to submit an annexation
application to the Local Agency Formation Commission. At the same meeting, the City Council
also introduced an Ordinance and passed it to a second reading for tonight's meeting. The
Ordinance consists of a Prezone entitlement that includes Commercial Neighborhood (CN),
Open Space (OS), Residential Estate (RE), Residential Suburban (RS), and Residential Very
Low (RVL) prezoning designations for the 2;475 -acre area. The project area is located east of
San Francisquito Canyon, south of the Angeles National Forest, west and south of Bouquet
Canyon Road, and north and east of the existing City of Santa Clarita corporate boundary. The
project area is already in the City of Santa Clarita General Plan planning area and Sphere of
Influence; as such, amendments to the General Plan and Sphere of Influence are not necessary.
Adapted; "t-
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Other actions as approved by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
Overall, the annexation of the North Copperhill area would generate a neutral/no net fiscal
impact to the City of Santa Clarita. Anticipated public service expenditures such as Parks and
Recreation, Sheriff, Community Preservation, etc., would be managed so as not to exceed the
future projected revenues generated from the annexation.
ATTACHMENTS
Ordinance -
Prezone Map (Exhibit "A")
North Copperhill Annexation Area Vicinity Map
0-2
ORDINANCE NO. I I -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PREZONE NO. 11-001 (MASTER CASE 11 -03 8) FOR THE
PURPOSES OF ANNEXATION FOR THE NORTH COPPERHILL ANNEXATION AREA,
AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A."
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: FINDINGS OF FACT. The City Council does hereby make the following
findings of fact:
a. On March 28, 2011, staff initiated Master Case 11 -03 8 consisting of Prezone 11 -00 1 and
Annexation 11-002 for approximately 2,475 acres of land known as the North Copperhill
Annexation for unincorporated County of Los Angeles territory that is contiguous to the
corporate limits of the City of Santa Clarita as shown in Exhibit A. The North Copperhill
Annexation area also includes the three neighborhood communities of Bouquet Canyon,
Haskell Canyon, and Raintree.
b. The annexation area is located in the northern portion of the Santa Clarita Valley and is
located generally east of San Francisquito Canyon Road, south of the Angeles National
'Forest boundary, north of the existing City of Santa Clarita corporate limit, and west of
Bouquet Canyon Road. The annexation area also includes an area generally south of
Bouquet Canyon Road, east of the existing City limits, north of Plum Canyon Road, and
east of Santa Catarina Drive, inclusive of the residents on the east side of the street.
C. The project area contains both developed neighborhoods as well as undeveloped, natural
lands. The project area contains three elementary schools, three public parks, a fire
station, two Los Angeles County probation camps, a commercial center, electrical
transmission lines and both Los Angeles City aqueducts. The project area also contains
an estimated 9,543 permanent residents and 3,181 homes. Three (3) tentative tract maps
that were approved by Los Angeles County but that are not yet built would allow for an
additional 132 homes in the project area.
d. The land use to the west of the project consists of rural properties in the San Francisquito
Canyon area. The area to the north of the project site consists of the Angeles National
Forest. Rural properties border the annexation on the east in the vicinity of Bouquet
Canyon Road and developing neighborhoods are located east of the project area in the
vicinity of Plum Canyon Road. Developed areas within the City of Santa Clarita form the
southern border of the project area.
e. Under the County of Los Angeles, the project area is currently zoned A-1-1 (Light
Agriculture, one -acre minimum lot size), A -1 -1 -DP (Light Agriculture, one -acre
3
minimum lot size Development Program), A-2-1 (Heavy Agriculture, one -acre minimum
lot size), A-2-2 (Heavy Agriculture, two -acre minimum lot size), C -2 -DP (Neighborhood
Business, Development Program), R-1-5000 (Single Family Residential; 5,000 sq. ft.
minimum lot size), R-1-7000.(Single Family Residential, 7,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size),
RPD -1-3 (Residential Planned Development, one -acre minimum lot size, 3.0 units per
acre), RPD -1-11U (Residential Planned Development, one -acre minimum lots size, 11
units per acre), R -1 -10000 -DP_ (Single Family Residential, 10,000 sq. ft. minimum lot
size, Development Program), RPD -5000-3.5U (Residential Planned Development, 5,000
sq. ft. minimum lot size, 3.5 units per acre), RPD -5000-4U (Residential Planned
Development, 5,000 sq. ft, minimum lot size, 4 units per acre), RPD -5000-4.5U
(Residential Planned Development, 5,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size, 4.5 units per acre),
RPD -6000-4U (Residential Planned Development, 6,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size, 4 units
per acre), RPD -6000-5.9U (Residential Planned Development, 6,000 sq. ft. minimum lot
size, 5.9 units per acre), and RPD -10000-1.9U (Residential Planned Development, 10,000
sq. ft. minimum .lot size, 1.9 units per acre).
£ Los Angeles County Land Use designations under the Santa Clarita Valley Area Plan
include C (Commercial), HM (Hillside Management), N2 (Non -Urban 2, 0.5 to 1.0 units
per acre), O (Open Space), O/BLM (Open Space, Bureau of Land Management), O -P
(Open Space Parks), P (Public Service Facilities), U1 (Urban 1, 1.1 to 3.3 units per acre),
U2 (Urban 2, 3.4 to 6.6 units per acre), U3 (Urban 3, 6.7 to 15.0 units per acre), and W
(Floodway/Floodplain).
g. On June 17, 2011, an environmental Initial Study was prepared for Prezone 11-001 and
Annexation 11-002, for the proposed North Copperhill Annexation. Pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality. Act, the Initial Study concluded that adverse
environmental impacts associated with the project were less than significant and a
Negative Declaration was prepared.
h. The environmental document has been circulated for review and comment by affected
governmental agencies and the public from June 17, 2011, to July 19, 2011.
i. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Clarita held a duly noticed public hearing
on this issue on July 19, 2011. This public hearing was held at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall,
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. At the hearing the Planning
Commission considered the staff presentation, staff report, the Negative Declaration
prepared for the project, and public testimony on the proposal.
j. At the public hearing noted above, the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Clarita
unanimously adopted Resolution PII-15 recommending that the City Council adopt
Prezone 11-001, for the purpose of prezoning approximately 2,475 acres and adopting the
Negative Declaration prepared for the project.
k. On August 2, 2011, staff noticed a public hearing for the North Copperhill Annexation
area. All property owners within the proposed annexation area, along with all property
owners within 1,000 feet of the proposed project area were sent notices of the proposed
public hearing. A one-eighth (1/8) page advertisement was placed in The Signal
newspaper, and six signs were posted in the project area.
The City Council of the City of Santa Clarita conducted a duly noticed public hearing on
this issue on August 23, 2011. This public hearing was held at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall,
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. At the hearing the City Council
considered the staff report, received public testimony on the project, and closed the public
hearing. During the same meeting, the City Council adopted the Negative Declaration
that was prepared for the project and introduced and passed to a second reading an
ordinance that would prezone the proposed annexation area with zoning designations
consistent with the City of Santa Clarita Zoning Ordinance.
M. Public participation and notification requirements pursuant to Sections 65090, 65391 and
65854 of the Government Code of the State of California were duly followed.
SECTION 2. Based upon the testimony and other evidence received at the hearing, and
upon the study and investigation made by the Planning Commission and on its behalf, the City
Council further finds as follows:
a. The purpose of the proposal is to prezone the approximate 2,475 -acre project area to
include 1.8 acres as Commercial Neighborhood (CN), 810.1 acres as Open Space (OS),
268.1 acres as Residential Estate (RE), 1,389 acres as Residential Suburban (RS), and 6.8
acres as Residential Very Low (RVL), as shown in Exhibit A.
b. That the prezone is consistent with the City's General Plan.
C. Public participation and notification requirements pursuant to Sections 65090 and 65391
of the Government Code of the State of California were duly followed.
SECTION 3. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS. Based
upon the testimony and other evidence received, the City Council finds as follows:
a. On August 23, 2011, the City Council adopted a Negative Declaration for the project that
was prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The
Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the City Council that, based on
the Initial Study and the entire record of proceedings, there is no substantial evidence that
the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
SECTION 4. FINDINGS FOR PREZONE. Based upon the foregoing facts and findings,
the City Council hereby finds as follows:
a. Prezoning is required under Section 5675(a)(3) of the Government Code in that, prior to
the Local Agency Formation Commission taking an action on an annexation, the subject
site must be prezoned by the annexing city;
s
b. Prezone .11-001, and specifically its proposed amendment to the of the City of Santa
Clarita Zoning Map, is consistent with existing development and/or existing development
entitlements for the subject site; and
C. Prezone 11-001 is consistent with the objectives of the Unified Development Code in that
it implements the goals and objectives of the General Plan and guides the future growth
of the City in that it meets the development policies of the City of Santa Clarita.
SECTION 5. The City Council hereby introduces and passes to second reading, this
ordinance approving Prezone 11-001 pertaining to the North Copperhill Annexation as described
herein and shown on attached Exhibit A.
M
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published as required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of August 2011.
AN •'
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
"-7
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Sarah Gorman, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance 11- was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 23rd day of August 2011. That thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 13th day
of September 2011, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the foregoing is the original of Ordinance 11- and
was published in The Signal newspaper in accordance with State Law (G.C. 40806).
CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
CERTIFICATION OF
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE
City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby
certify that this is a true and correct copy of the original Ordinance 11- , adopted by the City
Council of the City of Santa Clarita, CA on August 23, 2011, which is now on file in my office.
Witness my hand 'and seal of the City of Santa Clarita, California, this day of
20
City Clerk
By
Deputy City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Sarah Gorman, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, � do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance 11- was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 2011. That thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day
of 2011, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the foregoing is the original of Ordinance and
was published in The Signal newspaper in accordance with State Law (G.C. 40806).
CITY CLERK
8
�v
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
CERTIFICATION OF
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE
I, , City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby
certify that this is a true and correct copy of the original Ordinance 11- , adopted by the City
Council of the City of Santa Clarita, CA on , 2011, which is now on file in my office.
Witness my hand and seal of the City of Santa Clarita, California, this day of
2011.
City Clerk
By
Deputy City Clerk
0
C
m
Q
LU
K
' F
m
S
I.
1 �
aoa
W
a d
a�SpFa�
UtzQ
gb
LU
a
= a
O
r
m
n w
s s
9
--
10%
M
y&M .v
S
1 �
aoa
��'�. 0✓ion1E
WM'�4'b�+u acrxaayub '- ao 3a - '•�• �.
W �e va3ni s owvoes i. �� � m
a5,cyLcnxvoi aoNV 11x oaq�.a Lµxa
oywv �u s
0 3 no
d a� nnmwvo xa
A&'^nYov
Hl MJVNVWVl
Utl Mo�a?OJ3{a-