HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-06-14 - AGENDA REPORTS - STORMWATER FEE (2)CONSENT CALENDAR
DATE:
SUBJECT:
DEPARTMENT:
Agenda Item: 13
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager Approval
Item to be presented by:
June 14, 2011
Darren Hernandez
SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE
ANNUAL STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION FEE FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012
Administrative Services
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council conduct a second reading and adopt an ordinance entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING
THE ANNUAL STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION FEE FOR FISCAL YEAR
2011/12."
BACKGROUND
The collection of the Annual Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee (Fee) began in 1992. The Fee
is used to meet the requirements of the 1972 Federal Clean Water Act and the acquisition of the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (Permit) and maintenance of the
system. Under this Permit, and with the Fees collected, programs are administered and funded,
such as pollution education and prevention, street sweeping, and cleaning of storm drain catch
basins.
Pursuant to Section 15.50.070 of the City's Municipal Code, the City shall annually hold a public
hearing or meeting where an oral and written presentation may be made in connection with the
Fee. The City Clerk has published notice of such annual public hearing as provided by law, and
a public hearing was scheduled and held on May 24, 2011.
In 2009, property owners approved the Fee by a vote through a Mailed Ballot Special Election
process that was conducted per the requirements of the California State Constitution and under
Proposition 218 and Article XIIID. With a new rate methodology, the approved Fee reduced the
annual stormwater cost for most residential property owners. A total of 13,459 valid ballots were
received; of those 10,294 (76%) voted "yes," and 3,164 (24%) voted "no." As a result, the City
Council held a public hearing on October 27, 2009, and adopted Ordinance No. 09-14
(Ordinance,) establishing the new methodology to be used to calculate the Annual Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Fee.
Pursuant to Section 3 of the Ordinance, the City Council shall annually determine the rates of the
Fees subject to the maximum fees authorized by the Ordinance. The City Council may determine
to do any of the following: a) discontinue the Fee, b) reduce the actual Fee rate imposed below
the maximum Fee rate authorized, or c) increase their rate up to or below the maximum
voter -authorized rate if it has been previously set below such rate. The City Council shall not be
required to include an inflation increase in each year but may accumulate the inflationary
increase and enact the cumulative amount.
It is proposed that the Fee be increased by $0.95 per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU), making
the maximum Fee for Fiscal Year 2011/12 $22.45 per ERU. This is the voters' authorized
maximum, as it may only increase by an amount equal to the Consumer Price Index for All
Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles, Riverside, and Orange County areas.
The Stormwater Fee methodology was modified in 2009, and the City Council chose not to raise
the Fee for Fiscal Year 2010/11. The funds may be used to help fund the studies for Bacteria
TMDL Compliance Requirements mandated to by the Los Angeles County Regional Water
Quality Control Board. The studies will be conducted over several years, and for Fiscal Year
2011/12, $265,000 has been recommended to be included in the City Budget. Staff anticipates
that future costs for Bacterial TMDL compliance will exceed the total amount of the Stormwater
Fee.
An annual report and preliminary list of the rates for each identified parcel subject to the Fees for
Fiscal Year 2011/12 has been prepared (Annual List) and is on file with the City Clerk. Having
conducted the public hearing on May 24, 2011, the City Council may consider the attached
ordinance determining the rate for the Annual Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee for Fiscal
Year 2011/12. If the attached ordinance is adopted, Willdan Financial Services, Inc. is directed
to prepare and file the Annual List with the Los Angeles County Assessor to be placed on the tax
rolls and collected with regular City and County taxes.
ALTERNATIVES ACTIONS
Other action as determined by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the General Fund with this action.
ATTACHMENTS
Ordinance - Annual Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee for FY 2011/12
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee - 2011/2012 Annual Fee Report available in the City
Clerk's Reading File
—2_
ORDINANCE NO. I I -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA,
DETERMINING THE ANNUAL STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION FEE
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Clarita (City) is empowered by Health and Safety Code
Section 5471, Government Code Section 54300 et seq., Government Code Section 54999 et seq.,
and Chapter 15.50 of Title 15 of the City's. Municipal Code (Code) to prescribe and collect rates
and charges, including storm drainage user charges and fees for services and facilities furnished
by the City in connection with its stormwater drain system; and
WHEREAS, in order to better provide for storm drainage and flood control services,
including pollution prevention for the City, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita (City
Council) proposed to restructure its storm drainage pollution abatement charge, be known as the
"Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee" (Fee); and
WHEREAS, a written report entitled, "Rate Analysis Report," dated February 23, 2009,
(Report) was prepared for the City by Harris & Associates and filed with the City Clerk of the
City relating to the Stormwater Drainage Utility (Program), containing 1) the identification of the
parcels of land within the City upon which the Fee should be imposed (Identified Parcels), 2) the
method for determining the amount of the Fee to be imposed each year upon the Identified
Parcels as a source of funding for such storm drainage and flood control services, including but
not limited to services with which to manage stormwater runoff, so as to better protect life and
property within the City, and 3) the proposed Fee amount of $21.50 per Equivalent Residential
Unit for Fiscal Year 2009/10 and the maximum annual amount thereafter to be imposed on the
Identified Parcels; and
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 09-16, adopted on March 10, 2009, the City Council
accepted the Report, and scheduled a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, in compliance with the provisions of Section 6 of Article XIIID of the
California Constitution ("Section 6" and "Article XIIID," respectively), the Proposition 218
Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750, et sem.) (Act) and the Code, the
City Council on May 26, 2009, and continued to June 9, 2009, conducted a public hearing on the
matters of the Program, the proposed Fee, and any other aspect of the Report; and
WHEREAS, following a determination that there was not a majority protest, the City
Council in its Resolution No. 09-50, confirmed the Report, as modified, and called a special mail
ballot election for August 25, 2009; and
-3-
WHEREAS, by resolution adopted on September 8, 2009, the City Council declared that
the ballot measure to authorize the restructuring and levy of the Fee, as described and subject to
the terms and conditions of the prescribed by the Report, is passed; and
WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 10-14 adopted on October 27, 2009, the City Council
authorized and adopted the restructuring, levy, and collection of the Fee, beginning with the
Fiscal Year 2010/11; and,
WHEREAS, the Fee would continue to be collected on the County of Los Angeles tax
roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not
separately from, the general taxes of the City in the manner prescribed by Sections 5473 et sem.
of the California Health and Safety Code, as provided in Chapter 15.050 of the Code; and
. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15.50.070 of the Code, the City shall annually hold a
public hearing or meeting where oral and written presentations may be made in connection with
the Fee; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has published notice of such annual public hearing as
provided by law, and a public hearing was held on June 8, 2010, where oral and written
testimony was taken; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3 of Ordinance No. 09-14, the City Council shall
determine the amount of the Fees for the Fiscal Year 2010/11, subject to the maximum fees
authorized by Ordinance No. 09-14 and as set forth in the Report, and, in connection therewith,
an annual report or list of the Fee for each Identified Parcel for Fiscal Year 2010/11 has been
prepared (Annual List); and
WHEREAS, it is now appropriate that the City Council determine the amount of the Fees
for Fiscal Year 2011/112.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, California, does
hereby ordain as follows:
. SECTION 1. Recitals True and Correct. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and
the City Council hereby so finds and determines.
SECTION 2. Annual Procedure for Determination of Fees to be Levied. Pursuant to
Ordinance No. 09-14 and applicable law, without voter approval, in any year, the City Council
may do any of the following: a) discontinue the Fee, b) reduce the actual rate imposed below the
maximum rate authorized, or c) increase the rate up to or below the maximum voter -authorized
rate if it has been previously set below such rate. The City Council shall not be required to
include an inflation increase in each year but may accumulate the inflationary increase and enact
the cumulative amount. In no event shall the City Council increase the rate in excess of the
maximum rate approved by the voters without voter approval required by Section 6 of
Article XIIID.
2
SECTION 3. Amount of 2011-2012 Fee. The City Council has determined to increase
the. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee for Fiscal Year 2011/12 by $0.95 per Equivalent
Residential Unit (ERU) for each Identified Parcel as provided in the Annual List on file with the
City Clerk and incorporated herein by this reference. The Annual List is hereby approved. The
amount of the Fee for Fiscal Year 2011/12 is $22.45 per ERU; this amount is the maximum
voter -approved rate inclusive of a rate increased by an amount equal to the Consumer Price Index
for All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles, Riverside, and Orange County areas.
SECTION 4. Transmittal to County Auditor. On or before August 10, 2011, or such
other earlier deadline as the Los Angeles County Auditor (County Auditor) may prescribe, the
Willdan Financial Services shall cause the filing on behalf of the City with the County Auditor of
the Annual List to be posted to the tax roll for collection, together with such additional
information and in such format as ,the County Auditor customarily requires.
SECTION 5. Severability. If any one or more of the terms, provisions, or sections of this
Ordinance shall to any extent by judged invalid, unenforceable and/or voidable for any reason
whatsoever by a court of competent jurisdictions, then each and all of the remaining terms,
provisions, and sections of this Ordinance shall not be affected thereby and shall be valid and
enforceable.
SECTION 6. Non -Exclusivity. Nothing in this Ordinance shall limit or preclude the
enforcement of other applicable laws.
SECTION 7. Effectiveness. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30)
days after its passage.
SECTION 8. Publication. The City Clerk is directed to cause this Ordinance to be
published within 15 days of its passage in a newspaper of general circulation published and
circulated within the City of Santa Clarita.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of , 2011.
u: •;
ATTEST:
ACTING CITY CLERK
DATE:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Kevin Tonoian, Acting City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Ordinance 11- was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at
a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 2011. That thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of
2011, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the foregoing is the original of Ordinance and was
published in The Signal newspaper in accordance with State Law (G.C. 40806).
ACTING CITY CLERK
4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
CERTIFICATION OF
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE
I, , Acting City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do
hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of the original Ordinance 11- , adopted by the
City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, CA on , 2011, which is now on file in my
office.
Witness my hand and seal of the City of Santa Clarita, California, this day of 2011.
Acting City Clerk
By
Deputy City Clerk
gI 1N it" @4ILiN v
TABLE OF Coj4TFNTS
INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................1
BACKGROUNDINFORMATION.................................................................................1
COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION........................................................ 3
SERVICESFUNDED...................................................................................4
RATE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS................................................................. 5
COSTESTIMATE........................................................................................ 9
FEE CALCULATIONS
APPEALS PROCESS................................................................................12
WILLDAN
Financial Services
T R ` I
The City of Santa Clarita (City) Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee is being levied per
Chapter 15.50 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code and the California Health and Safety
Code Section 5471 et seq. This Annual Fee Report (Report) is prepared pursuant to
the California Health and Safety Code Section 5473 in order to place the fee on the Los
Angeles County property tax bills.
In May 1992, the City provided the County with a
Co -Permittee with the County in the application
Elimination System (NPDES) permit. There wer
agencies that filed a letter of intention to participate
CA006154.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
letter of intention to participate as a
of a National Pollution Discharge
e eighty-six (86) other co -permittee
in the County's NPDES Permit No.
In accordance with the Federal Clean Water Act of 1972, the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is required to establish regulations setting forth
NPDES permit standards. The enactment of 1987 amendments to the Federal Clean
Water Act (Act) of 1972 imposes permit requirements for discharge of storm waters.
The Act allows the EPA to delegate its NPDES permitting authority to states with an
approved environmental regulatory program. The State of California is one of the
delegated states.
The responsibility for implementing various NPDES permits in the State of California
has been delegated to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). The
SWRCB administers NPDES authority through its nine Regional Boards. In anticipation
of the issuance of the Federal regulations, the Los Angeles County Department of
Public Works (LACDPW), together with 86 other cities, applied to the Los Angeles
Regional Water Quality Control Board (LA-RWQCB) and SWRCB for an "early" permit.
On June 18, 1990, the NPDES permit for Stormwater/Urban Runoff Discharge in Los
Angeles County was issued. Los Angeles County is the designated "Principal Permittee"
with the 86 cities given the opportunity to become Co -Permittees. The City of Santa
Clarita is the only incorporated City in the Los Angeles County portion of the Santa
Clara River watershed. The Santa Clara River runs 86 miles from Acton to Ventura,
eventually reaching the Pacific Ocean. The City is approximately 45 miles from the
Pacific Ocean. The Santa Clara River provides habitat to hundreds of plant and animal
species, 16 of which are threatened or endangered. The Santa Clara River provides
roughly 50% of the water supply to the Santa Clarita Valley area.
The City of Santa Clarita is in somewhat of a unique situation with regard to stormwater
management. Being a relatively new city, most of the street and drainage systems were
developed during the process of land development under the supervision of Los
Angeles County. Both before and after incorporation in 1987, the ownership of drainage
facilities, once constructed, have been transferred to the Los Angeles County Flood
Control District (LACFCD). However, in the past few years the LACFCD has not been
2011/2012 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee Page 1 of 12
fix_ :- WILLDAN
Financial Services
processing title transfer requests in a timely manner. As a result, there are currently
approximately 230 storm drains in the City that are maintained by the County and 200
storm drains that are still the responsibility of the developer for maintenance. Many of
the privately maintained storm drains will probably become the City's at some future
time. The public streets, which are a part of the primary storm drainage system, are
owned and maintained by the City. The storm drainage catch basins in the street,
present a mix of ownership and responsibility. There are some storm drainage catch
basins owned by LACFCD and others that are owned by the City.
In order to provide for the safety of the residents of the City and protect property in the
City from the damage associated with flooding and to meet water quality requirements
of the NPDES permit issued to the City by the LA-RWQCB and SWRCB, it is necessary
to design, construct, operate, maintain, improve and replace storm drainage facilities
which collect storm and surface water runoff and convey and treat such runoff in a safe
manner to an acceptable point of discharge. It is also necessary to inspect, monitor, and
take enforcement action related to illegal dumping, illicit discharges, and various water
quality concerns. In order to properly fund such facilities and activities, the City Council
has determined that it is necessary to impose on all properties in the City a user charge
for storm drainage service.
In addition to existing costs, the City incurred significant increased costs for compliance
with the new NPDES Permit issued by the LA-RWQCB and SWRCB in 2009. There is a
significant monitoring requirement. Currently, Los Angeles County pays for a single
mass emissions monitoring station on the Santa Clara River. The new requirements will
increase the monitoring sites significantly. Los Angeles County has stated it will not pay
for the increased monitoring. Staff estimates the increased monitoring will likely cost
$1.5 million during the first year if the requirements are retained as written in the .
Ventura County NPDES Permit. If significant pollution levels are found, monitoring costs
will likely increase; if not, the monitoring costs could decrease. Staff cannot anticipate
the cost increase associated with significant pollution levels. There are hundreds of
pollutants to monitor for. that the City has little experience with mitigating. The expense
of response largely depends on the type of pollutant, if any, found. For example,
bacteria requires disinfection, metals requires filtration, etc. However, treatment for
certain types of pollutants can be profoundly expensive.
Another anticipated, additional requirement is trash excluders. These are devices
installed inside catch basins to prevent trash, litter and debris on the streets from getting
into the storm drain system. Each device costs between $2,000 and $2,300 to install.
Staff anticipates an additional cost of $600,000 to retrofit all 264 catch basins if this
requirement is retained. Other treatment best management practices that may be
required include creating infiltration rain gardens surrounding catch basins and one or
two large scale infiltration projects. Rain gardens essentially create planted areas
around catch basins to capture flows from the street before entering the storm drain
system. They force the flows to infiltrate into the ground before entering the Santa Clara
River. Large scale infiltration projects divert flows that enter the storm drain system.
These flows are treated and infiltrated in large land areas, such as parks, preventing
2011/2012 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee Page 2 of 12
, WILLDAN
Financial Services
much of the flows from reaching the surface water, such as rivers. Staff anticipates
costs for rain gardens on inlets/streets at a cost of approximately $2,000,000 annually
for 20 years. The large scale infiltration projects may cost $10 million or more between
2009 and 2014.
The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee will continue to provide funding for the
ongoing water quality requirements for the drainage facilities serving the properties
within the City of Santa Clarita.
COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT LEGISLATION
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218 (The Right To Vote
On Taxes Act) that established specific requirements for the ongoing imposition of
taxes, assessments and fees. The provisions of this proposition are now contained in
the California Constitutional as Articles XIIIC and XIIID.
The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee must comply with the provisions of Article
XIIID of the California Constitution. Section 6.b of Article XIIID has the following
requirements for all "new, extended, imposed or increased" fees and charges:
• "Revenues derived from the fee or charge shall not exceed the funds required to
provide the property -related service."
• "Revenues derived from the fee or charge shall not be used for any purpose
other than that for which the fee or charge was imposed."
• "The amount of a fee or charge imposed upon any parcel or person as an
incident of property ownership shall not exceed the proportional cost of the
service attributable to the parcel."
• "No fee or charge may be imposed for a service unless that service is actually
used by, or immediately available to, the owner of the property in question. Fees
or charges based on potential or future use of service are not permitted. Standby
charges, whether characterized as charges or assessments, shall be classified
as assessments and shall not be imposed without compliance with [the
assessment section of this code]."
"No fee or charge may be imposed for general governmental services including,
but not limited to, police, fire, ambulance or library services where the .service is
available to the public at large in substantially, the same, manner as it is to
property owners."
2011/2012 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee Page 3 of 12
WILLDAN
Financial Services
Expenditures from the revenue generated from the Stormwater Utility fee are to comply
with the requirements set forth in the NPDES permit. The activities and services funded
by this fee include, but are not limited to:
1. Administration and oversight of the requirements set forth in the NPDES permit
to various City departments, developments, and local agencies.
2. Prepare ordinances and resolutions designed to remain in compliance with the
rules and regulations required by the NPDES permit, the Clean Water Act, and
the Porter -Cologne Act.
3. Respond to and investigate incidents of illicit discharges and illegal connections
to the storm drain system.
4. Periodically inspect facilities for proper handling of materials, chemicals,
pollutants, garbage, waste, and debris and prevent any discharges to the storm
drain system.
5. Regularly clean and provide maintenance of catch basins, the flow line, and
storm drainage facilities.
6. Installation and maintenance of water quality devices required to keep pollutants
out of the storm drain system.
7. Discourage illegal dumping or discharge of pollutants into the storm drain system
by stenciling all City -owned catch basins with a "No Dumping" message.
8. Provide street sweeping to keep litter and debris from entering the storm drain
system.
9. Augment public education and outreach programs in regards to the proper use
and function of the storm drainage system and the receiving waters.
10. Develop programs to promote, publicize, and facilitate public reporting of illicit
discharges to the storm drain system.
11. Encourage the proper disposal of household hazardous waste (HHW) to prevent
the improper disposal to the storm drain system or to the sewer system.
Discourage the improper disposal of litter, garden clippings, leaves, and pet waste into
the street or the storm drain system.
2011/2012 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee Page 4 of 12
WILLDAN
16
Financial Services
STRUCTURE
Section 6.b of Article XIIID of the State Constitution states that:
"The amount of a fee or charge imposed upon any parcel or person as an incident
of property ownership shall not exceed the proportional cost of the service
attributable to the parcel." and
"No fee or charge may be imposed 'for a service unless that service is actually
used by, or immediately available to, the owner of the property in question."
By definition, all properties that shed stormwater into the City's stormwater drainage
system, use or are served by the City's stormwater drainage system; therefore should
be subject to a fee. The amount of use attributed to each parcel is measurable by the
amount of storm runoff contributed by the property, which is directly proportional to the
amount of ' impervious area on a parcel (such as buildings and concrete). The more
impervious area on a property, the more storm runoff the property generates, the more
demand placed on the storm drain system.
The amount each parcel uses the stormwater drainage system is computed by the
following formula: (Parcel Area) x (Impervious Percentage) = Drainage Units
The typical percent impervious (% Impervious) for land uses in the City, as provided in
the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Hydrology Manual, updated January
2006, have been applied for the purposes of estimating the runoff generated by each
property. These are shown in Table 1 on the following page.
The more Drainage Units a parcel has, the more storm run-off it generates, and the
more it uses and impacts the stormwater drainage system.
It is standard practice to relate other land uses to a developed single family home,
instead of working exclusively with Drainage Units. The City's parcel database shows
that over 60% of the parcels within the City are designated as Single Family Residential
(SFR) parcels, and the median size of a SFR parcel is approximately 7,000 square feet
(0.16 acre). Therefore, it makes sense to relate all parcels to this median residential
property. Therefore, the runoff from a 0.16 -acre SFR parcel is set equal to one
Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) and this base ERU is calculated as follows: (0.16
acres of area) x 42% = 0.0672 Drainage Units = 1 ERU
2011/2012 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee Page 5 of 12
WILLDAN
Financial Services
The table below provides a preliminary summary of Drainage Units and ERUs for the
various land uses in the City.
Antenna ° 1
:; 338' 2°1°.` 0 08
1;13
;Cemetery
1
17 7T�, 1 Mc.' 1.77
26:34,.
Church/1hstn , � `�
,,., . 49 , X163 78 k. 82%, �`
, " `. °= ~, , 112.90~.:
1,754;40 ,
College:'. ° . a
" ry. 14..
, ':289:30 ° .
47%,. ,'` '��.1'27�88 ; .' . �'
� �`1,902`94 :
Com Recreation
16 ,
906, , _ 72 73 K
1,08236
Coni Storage.
,. ;w e 24
'_� 77 6,1.` ° :.90%
69 84:x,
1;039.35,
42.51= . ,
, 632:-57
Day Care . ;...
0,831,° ,
: `;.68%. "1:34;; 9
20;01,
274:"
:
.
12DeVPark 28:74"
Dump
2`
1:28�i
' 15% -
019.
2:86
E1=Hi School
=59914;;,",
"Actual `�
,`362.36.- `s , .
°5,392.21.
Golf
15:.
'313 84-< .
3%
16.78.
249.68
525-Ni"h°Densty;CND
,
,
90%;
2
,~ 00.W, ,
2;984.83.
~
' 157,`
49;46
�;'2
.,228:89
3,406.14High°DensityMFR
HotellMoteG
8;
•�`. ... 20.43v�
96%,; =,1954
290,73
°Light Industrial , ,
°� : 675' ;.`e - 1 410.03
_� 91% .
1,4.67%71-' -
21,840.99
,. Low.Density CNDQ,
;: ' .• , ; ,-` ; 4,995;4 >' 887.74;
55%, -
460:76 •-
6,856.58
Low
55°/q,
,106:57
X1,585:89
�Med Den"sityCNDQ .,
5,497`'529:63
86%°-;
445"62`,",
6;631.24
;Med:-Nnsity MFR,
;. _ 149',
09'25',
86% ;,
„ ;94.08, ; . "
1,399.95
Medical,Facility ,, „'
16
25 88r
' 74%9;
332.10
M nerai,Exfract, 17 .
4# „ ;254 37 ` 10% 25 44,_ .
378:53'
Mobile"Homes30
,' " 342 69 `
911
:4,698:31,
NurserieslAgr { . , ` 10 21-:25 =
15%
510 ~ 75.88
Officeo . ,, 297
, ',. :'29143 ! 91%,
277 50, a
'.; 4,129:39'
;OpenStorage 1... ~. ' 88 ...N
., $, '.155 79,
, ... 66%
�.o102, 83°
?,1,530:28
(?arking„
a 228.78a'91%�.-n�
�206`82:,�~`�~.
� 3;077:75
;Power Facilities... :....
8., ,. ` fi`w h';158 77; ° u, 47%.
. ,.. 3 24,62>: ` . .
1;110.44
Ranch ''
2,6 48 ;- ;' 42%
, 9 15 '. a ,
, ,'. 136:17 -
Regnl,Shopping'Gtr:' .,
' �� '�:39�
.., „, „' 125:'38=°4502-
2,158.10
Retail
s. 549
':'. 744.35.
97%
'` . 765:92, •.:
1,1,397.62
SFR=0.5 -
31,017"
< 6;206:85 !-
',42%r
° - 2,55436..'
38017.29
,SFR 1 `.: ` i . "`;1;018.732'.16
. ..
formula-`.
r . ;180 xt5�_.
;2,680.79
SFR Rural
1,017'
` 2431.24 ~ formula
; 272,.64 41 1,,
4,055.71
. Undev Park -,"X202
78` ,2%'. `°"
`;~3.06 -
45.47
`3,537;.
91.43.:
1;360.50 _
"Total' s ";
_t ,' 54,433~, ~`. 28;703'17;;; `,, N. . ,
B"972.09,133,513.27
2011/2012 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee Page 6 of 12
` � WILLDAN
Financial Services
SFR properties are separated into 3 groups and their impervious percentage is
calculated as follows:
d 3 hh, �. ak
�' . r_. m ✓"' `..k :.t f shy
k<x'e°?ie arca sa: k.m
�.
SFR=0.5 r,Jessro
SFR=1. areSFR "arcels 0;5-.1. acres, v „ ' , ., , 0 21 +acresmax=Q315 ,
SFR-Rur`aI are.SFfR arcelsmoreNtfan 1:acr`e 0-:315 + acres 1..0 z 10%.
�'
MultkFamily Residential (MFR) and Condominium (CNDO) units are split into categories
by the density, or number of dwelling units per acre (DU/Ac) as follows:
Condominium unit parcel areas are calculated:
1) either by using the sizes of the individual unit and the common area parcels
separately,
or
2) by dividing the total area of the condominium complex (which includes the
common area) by the number of condominium units and the total imperviousness
of the entire complex is attributed to each individual condo parcel in the complex.
(This divides the runoff of the entire complex to each of the individual units.)
Because these condominium common areas are taken into consideration in this
manner, they are exempt from the charge.
The latter calculation has been made when the individual unit areas are not readily
available. These two ways of calculating the charges are considered nearly equivalent
when applied. With the first method, the common area property is charged and paid by
the Home Owner Associations which are passed on to the individual units. With the
second method, the common area property is added into the individual units. Therefore,
proportionality has been maintained.
Within the City of Santa Clarita and the Santa Clara River Watershed, there are many
separate drainage areas of various terrains and with inlets, pipes and channels made of
various materials and in various conditions. The storm drain system discharges to the
Santa Clara River and its tributaries. The Santa Clara River provides habitat to
hundreds of plant and animal species. It also provides about 50% of the area's water
supply.
2011/2012 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee Page 7 of 12
High Rensi't`''�,
._Greaterfhan 18'DU/Ac
90%
Med Density,,,"1;0•-18
pUlAc
8:6%;
. `L'ow'Densif y N,.'';
, : ; ; Less'than10'Du/Ac .:..
`;., , . 55%
Condominium unit parcel areas are calculated:
1) either by using the sizes of the individual unit and the common area parcels
separately,
or
2) by dividing the total area of the condominium complex (which includes the
common area) by the number of condominium units and the total imperviousness
of the entire complex is attributed to each individual condo parcel in the complex.
(This divides the runoff of the entire complex to each of the individual units.)
Because these condominium common areas are taken into consideration in this
manner, they are exempt from the charge.
The latter calculation has been made when the individual unit areas are not readily
available. These two ways of calculating the charges are considered nearly equivalent
when applied. With the first method, the common area property is charged and paid by
the Home Owner Associations which are passed on to the individual units. With the
second method, the common area property is added into the individual units. Therefore,
proportionality has been maintained.
Within the City of Santa Clarita and the Santa Clara River Watershed, there are many
separate drainage areas of various terrains and with inlets, pipes and channels made of
various materials and in various conditions. The storm drain system discharges to the
Santa Clara River and its tributaries. The Santa Clara River provides habitat to
hundreds of plant and animal species. It also provides about 50% of the area's water
supply.
2011/2012 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee Page 7 of 12
WILLDAN
Financial Services
All parcels draining into City -maintained drainage infrastructure is proposed to be
charged the same user fee rate per ERU for stormwater runoff treatment. The
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee is proposed in perpetuity.
For the purposes of this report, City -maintained drainage infrastructure includes streets,
pipes, inlets, outlets, and natural drainage courses, and is also referred to as the "City's
stormwater drainage system." Parcels related to these types of property uses are
exempt from the runoff charge, as they are part of the infrastructure being funded. Also
exempt from the runoff charge is Caltrans right-of-way, because Caltrans handles its
own runoff under a separate NPDES permit.
Elementary through High Schools (EI -Hi Schools) have been looked at on an individual
basis to determine the actual percent impervious for each property, as properties with
this use had a wide range of impervious percentages.
Properties that had submitted appeals to the charge were reviewed and a determination
has been made on a parcel -by -parcel basis as to the applicability of the appeal to this
methodology.
2011/2012 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee Page 8 of 12
VWILLDAN
Financial Services
COST ESTMATE
FYy1011 "Expenditu"resk ,
Site -Specific"= Bndgepoit
$20;000''
Site=Specific"- ,Greekside
17,000;'
Site Specific =.Hidden Creek
14;000'`'.
Site Speclfic Hart Pony
4;000
Personnel
911;026;
4fficb'; %ipment and Program Costs °` , 9731'0;
Street Sweeping
::562,22k,'
Hazartlous Waste Collection 45,0.00
Professional and Contractual Services
515;500'
Storm Drain Repair a 19;606
General Fund"Overhead'AHocaton
434806
SubtoI:6f201112012 Expenditures "=
$2,631;866";
Anticipated"N6yi ermit.Ex6enditures (actuaCcosts unknown►
New Permitx' Iricrease"in Monitoring
$300;000'
New;P,.ermit =,CIP Trash Excluders
600;000.
naWQty evcesNewPermif- Regiolii,
2"000,000
Subtotal 2011/2012:Anticipated New"Permit Expenditures:.;
$2,900,000
Capital Projects �"
.
M00"Flowline;Annual Curb Gutter Flowline
""$150,000`
2011/2012 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee Page 9 of 12
.,vW I LLDAN
wlFinancial Services
ATS KIS
The estimated annual costs for the proposed storm drain improvements are $2,997,373.
Dividing that amount by the total number of ERUs in the City, the estimated Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Fee rate is $22.45 per ERU for fiscal year 2011/2012. The
maximum amount that can be charged per ERU for fiscal year 2011/2012 is $22.45 per
ERU.
The maximum rate will be increased each fiscal year by the annual change in the
Consumer Price Index (CPI), during the preceding year, for All Urban Consumers, for
the Los Angeles, Riverside and Orange County areas, published by the United States
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (or a reasonably equivalent index
should the stated index be discontinued).
The following table provides sample fee calculations for various land uses and parcel
sizes for fiscal year 2011/2012.
SFR 0 5, �''�`�3;500 :.�
0.08 , x,42% _"0.033600:7
$12.03-
0`0672< ,. X0.5
5,00'
` .% 011
"
f
F,SFR05
. �6
$15.43
SFR,0.5.0.16
. x �' ��ti , 42%�.` ._ '06 0,"["
0:0672
-fit '1
$22:45
Business,Park`; 21,780 . ,. 0.5 , x ; .� 91°lof•
0.455000" L'
42%'._
0.,117600a1ti ,.`0.0672 „-
1:75
$39.29
"SFR -0:5-r ,21,500_ 0.49`"�•,x 42%,:0.205800i'l,
,0°0672 3.0625
�$68.75
000;; ;
. 0 51 x .. 0.21,.
ac=0 5x2.1% 0.212100=r1.
, ' 0.0672 = _ 3.1563 '
$70,86
,SFR 35,000=�.a� . A.6 x ,. ''.0 21,
ac0 5x21% `,
: 'D,273000 1, -.U672 „ 4.0625,
$91.20•
SFR -Rural. _� ; �, 87.;120 __
-- 2 ,';x : 0.315 ac -1 x10-/ _
- 0.416000 1`
, 0:0672.
_ �; X6:1756
$138.64
-Low, Density CNDO :.. 7,100'.
-`16` 'x
55% _
,0088000 /.
0.0672
= <' 1:3095
$29:40
Low'Density=MFR '. s , 43,560; -
; 1 : x, .�,
55°/a.
; ° 0 550000'1'
, 0 0672, , ,,
= , 8:1845
$183174
MedDensi 3;150`
;.7,' x; `- AM. _
-0.060200%/
672 �., _ " 08958
$20:1.1'
:Med Densit '•m4k ....: 43,560.
1 <� x, .. �:
86%' _
` ' .0.860000.1' ., 0.0672 ,
; 12.7976
$287.31 '
.,,
High Densif.CNDO.,,. 1;800 ';.90%^
0.036000,1.0:0672,. _� , .-0:5357.x.,
$12.03-
Densi"Mf R ;,, 43,560 ,.°`„ „ 100 ; x..- �90%+>t=.-�0.900000�(�,
.� 0;-0672. . _ -.13:3929,.
$300.67
Service Station : 6,534 0.15.'' x - ...... `.. 91%.. _
° -0.136500° 1.
0.0672 = u .. : -20313 ,, ,
$45:60
Retail „, 5
00685000 3721721,780 2
$16203
Business,Park`; 21,780 . ,. 0.5 , x ; .� 91°lof•
0.455000" L'
=0.0672 6:=7708"�
$152:00 d
Office 10,890,°'_., ., ,25 _ ,x - 91%;'b =02275001
_00672 , = 33854
$76.00
Li ht Industrial _ „43,560 1: _.x 91%r. ._
.0 910000,1; ^ t):Q672 s- _ 13.5917 .`
_ $304:01;
Church .. :, 32,620:75-`
0672. , .. 9.486fi
$21297
El -Hi School"'560= r„ 100 ° 'x ,, 82°!0
0.820006,/
0:0672. 12.2024 , q.
$273.94
l)evelo ed�Parks 5x 0%,0.500000-/
0.06.72.. 74405
$167:04
Golf Courses. : ". 1000' .. x
0.300000 a
s 0.0672. 4'46,43 -
$100:22x'
;Vacant T , "'2 1%' s
0.020000a/,
. , ..0.0672 , _.{`6 , 0:2976..
$6168
SFR 'Single Family Residential 0:0672 Drainage U its per median°SFR ERU EgWblent Residentd Unit
Note. Condominium arcel,aren".Include a'l• ro=rata `share of the common 66ea Othe complex
2011/2012 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee Page 10 of 12.
,!
A( �' WI.LLDAN
w� . Financial Services
Fifty percent (50%) of all single family homes will have a charge equal to or less than
the median fee of $22.45.
The preliminary fee roll, which is a listing of each parcel to be charged a fee for fiscal
year 2011/2012, is by reference made a part of this report and is on file in the office of
the City Clerk.
2011/2012 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee Page 11 of 12
WILLDAN
Financial Services
APPEALSPROCESS
If a property owner disagrees with the calculation of his or her fee, based on the parcel
area and estimated impervious percentage assigned to the property, then the property
owner may appeal the calculation as follows:
Property owner must provide written documentation explaining the reason why
the charge should be changed. This documentation must include:
a. The name, phone number, mailing address, and email address, if available, of
the property owner.
b. The Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) of the property in question.
2. If additional documentation is required or insufficient documentation was
submitted, a representative of the Public Works Department or his or her
designee (Staff) will notify the property owner in writing.
3. Once Staff has determined that sufficient documentation has been submitted,
Staff will perform the initial review. Staff will notify the property owner in writing
within four (4) weeks from the time sufficient documentation was submitted as to
whether or not the fee amount will be changed.
a. If the determination is to change the fee amount, then the new fee amount
will be documented within the City's fee database.
b. If the determination is that the fee should not be changed, the property owner
can appeal Staffs decision to the City Engineer. The appeal must be made in
writing and returned no later than four (4) weeks from the date of mailing of
Staff s initial review decision. The City Engineer will notify the property owner
in writing within four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of the appeal as to
whether or not the fee amount will be changed.
If the owner of any parcel shall have reason to feel that the computation of the
ERU, count for his/her parcel is not correct, that person may file an .appeal
• with the City Engineer in the manner prescribed by the City Engineer. The
City Engineer will consider all data provided by the appellant and shall render
a decision in writing. The decision of the City Engineer will be final with
respect to City action on the appeal.
Appeals will be accepted annually up until June 30 for inclusion on the following fiscal
year's property tax roll submittal. However, if an appeal is granted by Staff or the City
Engineer that does not permit inclusion for the following fiscal year's property tax roll
submittal, a reimbursement will be provided to the property owner by the City.
2011/2012 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Fee Page 12 of 12